Literature DB >> 21512318

Biosimilars 2.0: guiding principles for a global "patients first" standard.

Joseph Miletich1, Geoffrey Eich, Gustavo Grampp, Barbara Mounho.   

Abstract

In the European Union, biosimilar products have been approved since 2006 under an abbreviated pathway that leverages their similarity to an existing "reference" biological product. The products approved to date are based on recombinant versions of endogenous proteins with well-understood structures and pharmacology, but complicated safety and immunogenicity profiles. The period during the 2000s that included the first reviews, approvals, sale and use of biosimilars, is referred to herein as "Biosimilars 1.0." Over the next several years, a new and advanced tranche of biosimilars will be developed for complex reference products, including medicines used in the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases. A global market for biosimilars is developing, and this may well foreshadow the beginning of the second era of product development. This Biosimilars 2.0 period will likely be characterized by the development of complex products, global harmonization of standards, and the increasing demand for long-term monitoring of pharmaceuticals. The products developed in this period should exhibit high levels of fidelity to the reference products and should be rigorously evaluated in analytical, non-clinical and clinical comparisons. Additionally, Biosimilars 2.0 manufacturers should strive for transparency in their labels and take proactive strides to be accountable to providers and patients for the quality of their products. An important opportunity now exists for the healthcare community, industry and regulators to work in partnership to outline the appropriate standards for these products to facilitate increased access while meeting patients' needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21512318      PMCID: PMC3149712          DOI: 10.4161/mabs.3.3.15599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAbs        ISSN: 1942-0862            Impact factor:   5.857


  25 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and immunogenicity comparability assessment strategies for monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Wendy S Putnam; Saileta Prabhu; Yanan Zheng; Meena Subramanyam; Yow-Ming C Wang
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 2.  Current and future issues in the manufacturing and development of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Steven Kozlowski; Patrick Swann
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Post-translational modifications in the context of therapeutic proteins.

Authors:  Gary Walsh; Roy Jefferis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Clinical comparability and European biosimilar regulations.

Authors:  Huub Schellekens; Ellen Moors
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Assessing the safety and comparative effectiveness of follow-on biologics (biosimilars) in the United States.

Authors:  S Hennessy; C E Leonard; R Platt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Statistical assessment of biosimilar products.

Authors:  Shein-Chung Chow; Jen-Pei Liu
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  Global regulatory standards for the approval of biosimilars.

Authors:  Barbara Mounho; Audrey Phillips; Kay Holcombe; Gustavo Grampp; Tony Lubiniecki; Inger Mollerup; Carolyn Jones
Journal:  Food Drug Law J       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.619

8.  Clinical investigation of the immunogenicity of interferon-alpha 2a.

Authors:  J C Ryff
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.607

9.  The presence or absence of antibodies to infliximab or adalimumab determines the outcome of switching to etanercept.

Authors:  Anna Jamnitski; Geertje M Bartelds; Michael T Nurmohamed; Pauline A van Schouwenburg; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; Steven O Stapel; Ben A C Dijkmans; Lucien Aarden; Gerrit Jan Wolbink
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Characterization of a complex glycoprotein whose variable metabolic clearance in humans is dependent on terminal N-acetylglucosamine content.

Authors:  Rodney Keck; Namita Nayak; Laura Lerner; Shanta Raju; Stacey Ma; Thomas Schreitmueller; Stephen Chamow; Kathy Moorhouse; Claire Kotts; Andrew Jones
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 1.856

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Biosimilars in rheumatic diseases: structural and functional variability that may impact clinical and regulatory decisions.

Authors:  Amit Lakhanpal; Ernest Brahn
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Bioanalytical strategy used in development of pharmacokinetic (PK) methods that support biosimilar programs.

Authors:  Alex Colbert; Amber Umble-Romero; Samantha Prokop; Vincent Fung-Sing Chow; Teresa Wong; Danielle DeSimone; Lei Zhou; Susan Pederson
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  Are biosimilars the next tool to guarantee cost-containment for pharmaceutical expenditures?

Authors:  María-Isabel Farfan-Portet; Sophie Gerkens; Isabelle Lepage-Nefkens; Irmgard Vinck; Frank Hulstaert
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-11-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.