Literature DB >> 20107450

Assessing the safety and comparative effectiveness of follow-on biologics (biosimilars) in the United States.

S Hennessy1, C E Leonard, R Platt.   

Abstract

As Congress begins drafting legislation concerning the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation of biosimilars, it is critical to keep in mind that these agents may differ from their innovator compounds. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to be able to differentiate among innovators and biosimilars in administrative data in order to facilitate the conduct of population-based safety and comparative effectiveness studies. This Commentary proposes methods that would allow these agents to be distinguished in such data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20107450     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2009.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  5 in total

1.  Biosimilars 2.0: guiding principles for a global "patients first" standard.

Authors:  Joseph Miletich; Geoffrey Eich; Gustavo Grampp; Barbara Mounho
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Product safety spillovers and market viability for biologic drugs.

Authors:  John Romley; Tiffany Shih
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2016-12-23

Review 3.  Comparative effectiveness research with administrative health data in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Marie Hudson; Koray Tascilar; Samy Suissa
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Rituximab and biosimilars - equivalence and reciprocity.

Authors:  Zaina P Qureshi; Jametta S Magwood; Sarveshwari Singh; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Biosimilars       Date:  2013-06-14

5.  Pharmacovigilance Considerations for Biosimilars in the USA.

Authors:  Gustavo Grampp; Thomas Felix
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.807

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.