Literature DB >> 20077246

Statistical assessment of biosimilar products.

Shein-Chung Chow1, Jen-Pei Liu.   

Abstract

Biological products or medicines are therapeutic agents that are produced using a living system or organism. Access to these life-saving biological products is limited because of their expensive costs. Patents on the early biological products will soon expire in the next few years. This allows other biopharmaceutical/biotech companies to manufacture the generic versions of the biological products, which are referred to as follow-on biological products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or as biosimilar medicinal products by the European Medicine Agency (EMEA) of the European Union (EU). Competition of cost-effective follow-on biological products with equivalent efficacy and safety can cut down the costs and hence increase patients' access to the much-needed biological pharmaceuticals. Unlike for the conventional pharmaceuticals of small molecules, the complexity and heterogeneity of the molecular structure, complicated manufacturing process, different analytical methods, and possibility of severe immunogenicity reactions make evaluation of equivalence (similarity) between the biosimilar products and their corresponding innovator product a great challenge for both the scientific community and regulatory agencies. In this paper, we provide an overview of the current regulatory requirements for approval of biosimilar products. A review of current criteria for evaluation of bioequivalence for the traditional chemical generic products is provided. A detailed description of the differences between the biosimilar and chemical generic products is given with respect to size and structure, immunogenicity, product quality attributed, and manufacturing processes. In addition, statistical considerations including design criteria, fundamental biosimilar assumptions, and statistical methods are proposed. The possibility of using genomic data in evaluation of biosimilar products is also explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20077246     DOI: 10.1080/10543400903280266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  5 in total

1.  Biosimilars 2.0: guiding principles for a global "patients first" standard.

Authors:  Joseph Miletich; Geoffrey Eich; Gustavo Grampp; Barbara Mounho
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Clinical considerations for the development of biosimilars in oncology.

Authors:  Mark A Socinski; Giuseppe Curigliano; Ira Jacobs; Barry Gumbiner; Judith MacDonald; Dolca Thomas
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Qianying Liu; Bing Yang; Saeed Ahmed; Jincheng Xiong; Tingting Song; Pin Chen; Jiyue Cao; Qigai He
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-05-01

4.  Fast and Sensitive HPLC-ESI-MS/MS Method for Etoricoxib Quantification in Human Plasma and Application to Bioequivalence Study.

Authors:  Gabriel Onn Kit Loh; Emily Yii Ling Wong; Yvonne Tze Fung Tan; Siew Chyee Heng; Mardiana Saaid; Kit Yee Cheah; Nurul Diyana Mohd Sali; Nair Damenthi; Sharon Shi Min Ng; Long Chiau Ming; Kok Khiang Peh
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 5.  Statistical Primer on Biosimilar Clinical Development.

Authors:  Leah Isakov; Bo Jin; Ira Allen Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.688

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.