Literature DB >> 21509762

A novel tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma using outcome analysis of a multi-institutional database*.

Tristan D Yan1, Marcello Deraco, Dominique Elias, Olivier Glehen, Edward A Levine, Brendan J Moran, David L Morris, Terence C Chua, Pompiliu Piso, Paul H Sugarbaker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, no tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system exists for patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). The primary objective was to formulate a clinicopathological staging system through the identification of significant prognostic parameters.
METHODS: Eight international institutions with prospectively collected data on patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy contributed to the registry. Two hundred ninety-four patients had complete clinicopathological data and formed the basis of this staging project.
RESULTS: Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was categorized into T(1) (PCI 1-10), T(2) (PCI 11-20), T(3) (PCI 21-30), and T(4) (PCI 30-39). Twenty-two patients had positive lymph nodes (N(1) ) and 12 patients had extra-abdominal metastases (M(1) ). The survival for patients with T(1) (PCI 1-10) N(0) M(0) was significantly superior to the other patients. This group of patients is therefore designated as Stage I. The survival of patients with T(2) (PCI 11-20) and T(3) (PCI 21-30), in absence of N(1) or M(1) disease, was similar. This group of patients was categorized as Stage II. The survival of patients with T(4) (PCI 30-39), N(1,) and/or M(1) was similarly poor. This group of patients was therefore categorized as Stage III. Three prognostic factors were independently associated with survival in the multivariate analysis: histological subtype, completeness of cytoreduction, and the proposed TNM staging. The 5-year survival associated with Stage I, II, and III disease was 87%, 53%, and 29%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed TNM staging system resulted in significant stratification of survival by stage when applied to the current multi-institutional registry data.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21509762     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  45 in total

1.  Unusual presentation of a late-onset recurrence of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Marije Wijnberge; Lidewine Daniels; Vincent Cliteur; Jasper Winkelhagen
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-06

2.  The impact of chemotherapy and its timing on survival in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated with complete debulking.

Authors:  Samer A Naffouje; Kiara A Tulla; George I Salti
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Clinical presentation, diagnosis, classification and management of peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Alfonso García-Fadrique; Akash Mehta; Faheez Mohamed; Sanjeev Dayal; Tom Cecil; Brendan J Moran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10

Review 4.  Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Joseph Kim; Shanel Bhagwandin; Daniel M Labow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

5.  Predictors and Outcomes of Surgery in Peritoneal Mesothelioma: an Analysis of 2000 Patients from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Lana Bijelic; Kathleen Darcy; Joshua Stodghill; Chunqiao Tian; Timothy Cannon
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Evolution of management in peritoneal surface malignancies.

Authors:  Emel Canbay; Bahar Canbay Torun; Ege Sinan Torun; Yutaka Yonemura
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-09-01

7.  A novel nomogram for peritoneal mesothelioma predicts survival.

Authors:  Nicholas P Schaub; Meghna Alimchandani; Martha Quezado; Phil Kalina; John S Eberhardt; Marybeth S Hughes; Tatiana Beresnev; Raffit Hassan; David L Bartlett; Steven K Libutti; James F Pingpank; Richard E Royal; Udai S Kammula; Prakash Pandalai; Giao Q Phan; Alexander Stojadinovic; Udo Rudloff; H Richard Alexander; Itzhak Avital
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic factors and oncologic outcome analysis.

Authors:  Deepa Magge; Mazen S Zenati; Frances Austin; Arun Mavanur; Magesh Sathaiah; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Heather Jones; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew Holtzman; Steven Ahrendt; James Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Glenn Broeckx; Patrick Pauwels
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10

10.  The prognostic significance of BAP1, NF2, and CDKN2A in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Aatur D Singhi; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Haroon A Choudry; David L Bartlett; James F Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; Alyssa Luvison; Kimberly Fuhrer; Nathan Bahary; Raja R Seethala; Sanja Dacic
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.