Literature DB >> 23233234

A novel nomogram for peritoneal mesothelioma predicts survival.

Nicholas P Schaub1, Meghna Alimchandani, Martha Quezado, Phil Kalina, John S Eberhardt, Marybeth S Hughes, Tatiana Beresnev, Raffit Hassan, David L Bartlett, Steven K Libutti, James F Pingpank, Richard E Royal, Udai S Kammula, Prakash Pandalai, Giao Q Phan, Alexander Stojadinovic, Udo Rudloff, H Richard Alexander, Itzhak Avital.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Estimation of personalized survival times can potentially guide treatment and surveillance.
METHODS: We analyzed 104 patients who underwent CRS and cisplatin-based HIPEC for MPM. By means of 25 demographic, laboratory, operative, and histopathological variables, we developed a novel nomogram using machine-learned Bayesian belief networks with stepwise training, testing, and cross-validation.
RESULTS: The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 15, and 66 % of patients had a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score of 0 or 1. Eighty-seven percent of patients had epithelioid histology. The median follow-up time was 49 (1-195) months. The 3- and 5-year overall survivals (OS) were 58 and 46 %, respectively. The histological subtype, pre-CRS PCI, and preoperative serum CA-125 had the greatest impact on OS and were included in the nomogram. The mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the 10-fold cross-validation of the 3- and 5-year models were 0.77 and 0.74, respectively. The graphical calculator or nomogram uses color coding to assist the clinician in quickly estimating individualized patient-specific survival before surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learned Bayesian belief network analysis generated a novel nomogram predicting 3- and 5-year OS in patients treated with CRS and HIPEC for MPM. Pre-CRS estimation of survival times may potentially individualize patient care by influencing the use of systemic therapy and frequency of diagnostic imaging, and might prevent CRS in patients unlikely to achieve favorable outcomes despite surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233234      PMCID: PMC6310138          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2651-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  28 in total

1.  Gail model and breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Gail; M H Greene
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Management of peritoneal-surface malignancy: the surgeon's role.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  A review of peritoneal mesothelioma at the Washington Cancer Institute.

Authors:  Paul H Sugarbaker; Laura S Welch; Faheez Mohamed; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  Abdominal computed tomography scans in the selection of patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma for comprehensive treatment with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tristan D Yan; Namic Haveric; Carlos P Carmignani; David Chang; Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma: The Washington Cancer Institute experience.

Authors:  Paul H Sugarbaker; Yair I Z Acherman; Santiago Gonzalez-Moreno; Gloria Ortega-Perez; O Anthony Stuart; Pierre Marchettini; Dal Yoo
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 6.  Rationale for hyperthermia with intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents.

Authors:  Robert P Sticca; Brian W Dach
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 7.  The rationale of perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.

Authors:  Matthew H Katz; Robert M Barone
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.495

8.  Binding of ovarian cancer antigen CA125/MUC16 to mesothelin mediates cell adhesion.

Authors:  Armin Rump; Yoshihiro Morikawa; Minoru Tanaka; Sawako Minami; Naohiko Umesaki; Masaki Takeuchi; Atsushi Miyajima
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Analysis of factors associated with outcome in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma undergoing surgical debulking and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrew L Feldman; Steven K Libutti; James F Pingpank; David L Bartlett; Tatiana H Beresnev; Sharon M Mavroukakis; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; David E Kleiner; H Richard Alexander
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Clinical presentation of peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Yair I Z Acherman; Laura S Welch; Christina M Bromley; Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2003 May-Jun
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical presentation, diagnosis, classification and management of peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Alfonso García-Fadrique; Akash Mehta; Faheez Mohamed; Sanjeev Dayal; Tom Cecil; Brendan J Moran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Joseph Kim; Shanel Bhagwandin; Daniel M Labow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  The role of imaging in diagnosis and management of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bradley Carlson; Carla Harmath; Kiran Turaga; Hedy L Kindler; Samuel G Armato; Christopher Straus
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-07

4.  Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic factors and oncologic outcome analysis.

Authors:  Deepa Magge; Mazen S Zenati; Frances Austin; Arun Mavanur; Magesh Sathaiah; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Heather Jones; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew Holtzman; Steven Ahrendt; James Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Repeat cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: review of indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Harveshp Mogal; Konstantinos Chouliaras; Edward A Levine; Perry Shen; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02

Review 6.  Treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-current perspectives.

Authors:  J Spiliotis; E Halkia; E de Bree
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Advances in the management of peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Ali Raza; Wei-Ching Huang; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A Histomorphologic Grading System That Predicts Overall Survival in Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma With Epithelioid Subtype.

Authors:  Kari Valente; Aaron U Blackham; Edward Levine; Greg Russell; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; John H Stewart; Perry Shen; Kim R Geisinger; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 9.  Can you Identify This Malignancy?

Authors:  Andria N Arrington
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2014-05

10.  Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies.

Authors:  Paolo Sammartino; Daniele Biacchi; Tommaso Cornali; Fabio Accarpio; Simone Sibio; Bernard Luraschi; Alessio Impagnatiello; Angelo Di Giorgio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.