Literature DB >> 30450291

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Glenn Broeckx1, Patrick Pauwels1.   

Abstract

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a very rare malignancy of the peritoneum and has a poor prognosis. Of all mesotheliomas, pleural mesothelioma is more common than MPM. In comparison to pleural mesothelioma, the link with asbestos exposure is weaker (33-50% vs. >80%), but it is still the best-defined risk factor. MPM spreads predominantly expansive rather than infiltrative and symptoms are related to tumor spread within the abdominal cavity. Often, MPM is encountered incidentally by diagnostic imaging or by surgery. Computed tomography scan is widely accepted as a first line modality in diagnostic imaging. In diagnostic histopathology, MPM presents some challenges. Firstly, adequate clinical information is of utmost importance to consider the possibility of the diagnosis of MPM. Furthermore, a few morphological subtypes and variants exist. The most sensitive immunohistochemical markers are calretinin (100%), WT1 (94%) and CK5/6 (89%). The malignant character of immunohistochemically demonstrated mesothelial cells is not always obvious. This paradigm somewhat changed with the advent of immunohistochemical demonstration of BAP1 (BRCA-1 associated protein 1). Loss of BAP1 expression supports a diagnosis of malignancy. The gold standard in treatment remains cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Targetable molecular pathways in MPM are being identified. An exciting finding was the demonstration of ALK rearrangements in a small subset of patients with MPM and it is hoped for that at least this small subgroup of patients could benefit from treatment with ALK inhibitors. First-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) did not show any significant activity in MPM. In contrast, nintedanib, an angiokinase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival and bevacizumab, a humanized anti-VEGF antibody increased overall survival in patients with MPM, when administered in combination with cisplatin and pemetrexed. Ongoing immunotherapy trials will offer a possible new treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer treatment protocols; clinical oncology; epidemiology; malignant mesothelioma; molecular biology

Year:  2018        PMID: 30450291      PMCID: PMC6204422          DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.10.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-6751


  31 in total

Review 1.  Clinical presentation, diagnosis, classification and management of peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Alfonso García-Fadrique; Akash Mehta; Faheez Mohamed; Sanjeev Dayal; Tom Cecil; Brendan J Moran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Update on malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Nicholas Paul Campbell; Hedy Lee Kindler
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 3.  Searching for targets for the systemic therapy of mesothelioma.

Authors:  R A Stahel; W Weder; E Felley-Bosco; U Petrausch; A Curioni-Fontecedro; I Schmitt-Opitz; S Peters
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Radiological predictors of complete cytoreduction in 59 patients with peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at a UK referral centre.

Authors:  Anuradha Chandramohan; Andrew Thrower; Nehal Shah; Faheez Mohamed
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed pleural mesothelioma in the Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Gérard Zalcman; Julien Mazieres; Jacques Margery; Laurent Greillier; Clarisse Audigier-Valette; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Olivier Molinier; Romain Corre; Isabelle Monnet; Valérie Gounant; Frédéric Rivière; Henri Janicot; Radj Gervais; Chrystèle Locher; Bernard Milleron; Quan Tran; Marie-Paule Lebitasy; Franck Morin; Christian Creveuil; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Arnaud Scherpereel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Treatment factors associated with long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and regional chemotherapy for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  H Richard Alexander; David L Bartlett; James F Pingpank; Steven K Libutti; Richard Royal; Marybeth S Hughes; Matthew Holtzman; Nader Hanna; Keli Turner; Tatiana Beresneva; Yue Zhu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Prognostic factors influencing survival in 35 patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  H Kaya; C Sezgı; A C Tanrıkulu; M Taylan; O Abakay; H S Sen; A Abakay; M Kucukoner; M Kapan
Journal:  Neoplasma       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.575

8.  Identification of ALK Rearrangements in Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Yin P Hung; Fei Dong; Jaclyn C Watkins; Valentina Nardi; Raphael Bueno; Paola Dal Cin; John J Godleski; Christopher P Crum; Lucian R Chirieac
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Clinical presentation of peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Yair I Z Acherman; Laura S Welch; Christina M Bromley; Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2003 May-Jun

10.  Detecting germline BAP1 mutations in patients with peritoneal mesothelioma: benefits to patient and family members.

Authors:  Muaiad Kittaneh; Charles Berkelhammer
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Imaging spectrum of mesenteric masses.

Authors:  Radwan Diab; Mayur Virarkar; Mohammed Saleh; Sherif Elsheif; Sanaz Javadi; Priya Bhosale; Silvana Faria
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

Review 2.  Peritoneal disease: key imaging findings that help in the differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Nuno M F Campos; Vânia Almeida; Luís Curvo Semedo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  A case of localized peritoneal malignant mesothelioma with ovarian metastasis and literature review.

Authors:  Jingwen Wang; Rong Hu; Qian He
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.244

4.  Localized gastric mesothelioma with nodal metastasis-an exceptionally rare entity.

Authors:  Mufaddal Kazi; Tejas Vispute; Prarthna Shah; Mukta Ramadwar; Manish S Bhandare; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Vikram A Chaudhari
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-03

5.  Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Tomohiko Fukunaga; Yumi Somatomo; Jun Kamiyama; Toshihiko Kasanami
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 6.  The Molecular Basis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Benjamin Wadowski; Assunta De Rienzo; Raphael Bueno
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 1.750

7.  Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma as a Rare Cause of Dyspeptic Complaints and Ascites: A Diagnostic Challenge.

Authors:  Susana Marques de Sousa; Filipa Pereira; Maria Duarte; Marta Marques; Dolores Vázquez; Cristina Marques
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-08

8.  Pediatric Mesothelioma With ALK Fusions: A Molecular and Pathologic Study of 5 Cases.

Authors:  Pedram Argani; Derrick W Q Lian; Abbas Agaimy; Markus Metzler; Sara E Wobker; Andres Matoso; Jonathan I Epstein; Yun-Shao Sung; Lei Zhang; Cristina R Antonescu
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 6.298

9.  Acute popliteal thrombus workup leads to discovery of primary peritoneal mesothelioma in the absence of any known asbestos exposure.

Authors:  Syed Tausif Ahmed; Matthew Barvo; Nayana Kamath; Richard Alweis
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-09

10.  "Omental Cake" in a Patient With Asbestosis Leading to the Diagnosis of Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Alejandro García Martínez; Inmaculada Pavón Guerrero; Lidia Campos Gonzaga
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.