Literature DB >> 21509432

Use of monetary and nonmonetary incentives to increase response rates among African Americans in the Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Jennifer Dykema1, John Stevenson, Chad Kniss, Katherine Kvale, Kim González, Eleanor Cautley.   

Abstract

From 2009 to 2010, an experiment was conducted to increase response rates among African American mothers in the Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Sample members were randomly assigned to groups that received a prepaid, cash incentive of $5 (n = 219); a coupon for diapers valued at $6 (n = 210); or no incentive (n = 209). Incentives were included with the questionnaire, which was mailed to respondents. We examined the effects of the incentives on several outcomes, including response rates, cost effectiveness, survey response distributions, and item nonresponse. Response rates were significantly higher for the cash group than for the coupon (42.5 vs. 32.4%, P < .05) or no incentive group (42.5 vs. 30.1%, P < .01); the coupon and no incentive groups performed similarly. While absolute costs were the highest for the cash group, the cost per completed survey was the lowest. The incentives had limited effects on response distributions for specific survey questions. Although respondents completing the survey by mail in the cash and coupon groups exhibited a trend toward being less likely to have missing data, the effect was not significant. Compared to a coupon or no incentive, a small cash incentive significantly improved response rates and was cost effective among African American respondents in Wisconsin PRAMS. Incentives had only limited effects, however, on survey response distributions, and no significant effects on item nonresponse.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21509432     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0780-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  7 in total

Review 1.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys.

Authors:  E Singer; M P Maher
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

3.  Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.

Authors:  P J Gibson; T D Koepsell; P Diehr; C Hale
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Increasing response rates in a survey of Medicaid enrollees: the effect of a prepaid monetary incentive and mixed modes (mail and telephone).

Authors:  Timothy J Beebe; Michael E Davern; Donna D McAlpine; Kathleen Thiede Call; Todd H Rockwood
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Coi Gl Msphbrenda; Amy Lansky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Comparing incentives to increase response rates among African Americans in the Ohio pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system.

Authors:  Sherry T Liu; Connie Geidenberger
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-05

7.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies.

Authors:  Christine E East; Mary A Biro; Suzanne Fredericks; Rosalind Lau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-01

2.  Effects of Sequential Prepaid Incentives on Response Rates, Data Quality, Sample Representativeness, and Costs in a Mail Survey of Physicians.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; John Stevenson; Nadia Assad; Chad Kniss; Catherine A Taylor
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.329

Review 3.  Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Sara R Till; David Everetts; David M Haas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.