Literature DB >> 20428935

Comparing incentives to increase response rates among African Americans in the Ohio pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system.

Sherry T Liu1, Connie Geidenberger.   

Abstract

Since 2005, the Ohio Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) has used a prepaid phone card incentive in an effort to increase survey response. Although Ohio PRAMS has generally achieved an overall response rate of 70%, African American participation has been significantly lower, a persistent problem documented by other PRAMS states. We examined the effect of a gift card incentive compared to the standard phone card on African American response. Sampled women in the African American stratum of Ohio PRAMS were randomly assigned to either the experimental (n = 276) or control (n = 274) incentive ($10 CVS gift card or 30-min prepaid phone card, respectively). Response rates were calculated for the total number of sampled African American women during the study period. Partial or full completion of the survey instrument by mail or phone was considered a response. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of response. Variables examined included age, education, ethnicity, marital status, smoking status, birth weight, Women Infants and Children (WIC) enrollment, prenatal care, parity, and incentive assignment. The overall unweighted response rate was significantly higher in the experimental group (60.5 vs. 48.5%, P = .002). Maternal and infant characteristics were similar between groups. Logistic regression modeling revealed that having more than 12 years of education (OR = 2.46, 1.56-3.89), gift card incentive (OR = 1.46, 1.02-2.10), and enrollment in WIC (OR = 1.57, 1.05-2.35) were independent predictors of increased survey response. Use of a $10 CVS gift card incentive in place of a prepaid phone card can positively impact African American response in PRAMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20428935     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-010-0609-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  6 in total

Review 1.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  Methods and strategies to recruit African Americans into cancer prevention surveillance studies.

Authors:  Jessie A Satia; Joseph A Galanko; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Increasing response rates in a survey of Medicaid enrollees: the effect of a prepaid monetary incentive and mixed modes (mail and telephone).

Authors:  Timothy J Beebe; Michael E Davern; Donna D McAlpine; Kathleen Thiede Call; Todd H Rockwood
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Coi Gl Msphbrenda; Amy Lansky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis.

Authors:  G W Sun; T L Shook; G L Kay
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12
  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Use of monetary and nonmonetary incentives to increase response rates among African Americans in the Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; John Stevenson; Chad Kniss; Katherine Kvale; Kim González; Eleanor Cautley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

2.  Gift card incentives and non-response bias in a survey of vaccine providers: the role of geographic and demographic factors.

Authors:  Joshua Van Otterloo; Jennifer L Richards; Katherine Seib; Paul Weiss; Saad B Omer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Sara R Till; David Everetts; David M Haas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-15

4.  Effect of Small Monetary Incentive and Demographic Characteristics on Response Rate of Self-Administered Questionnaire Mailed to Rural Women.

Authors:  Lacey A McCormack
Journal:  Online J Rural Res Policy       Date:  2013
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.