Literature DB >> 32924566

Effects of Sequential Prepaid Incentives on Response Rates, Data Quality, Sample Representativeness, and Costs in a Mail Survey of Physicians.

Jennifer Dykema1,2, John Stevenson1, Nadia Assad1, Chad Kniss1, Catherine A Taylor3.   

Abstract

While collecting high quality data from physicians is critical, response rates for physician surveys are frequently low. A proven method for increasing response in mail surveys is to provide a small, prepaid monetary incentive in the initial mailing. More recently, researchers have begun experimenting with adding a second cash incentive in a follow-up contact in order to increase participation among more reluctant respondents. To assess the effects of sequential incentives on response rates, data quality, sample representativeness, and costs, physicians (N = 1,500) were randomly assigned to treatments that crossed the amount of a first ($5 or $10) and second ($0, $5, or $10) incentive to form the following groups: Group $5/$5; Group $5/$10; Group $10/$0; Group $10/$5; and Group $10/$10. Overall, second incentives were associated with higher response rates and lower costs per completed survey, and while they had no effect on item nonresponse, they increased sample representativeness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs; data quality; incentives; mail surveys; physicians; response rates

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32924566      PMCID: PMC9331818          DOI: 10.1177/0163278720958186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.329


  13 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs.

Authors:  Stephen Barclay; Chris Todd; Ilora Finlay; Gunn Grande; Penny Wyatt
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  William L Cull; Karen G O'Connor; Sanford Sharp; Suk-fong S Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan B VanGeest; Timothy P Johnson; Verna L Welch
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians.

Authors:  Emily McFarlane; Murrey G Olmsted; Joe Murphy; Craig A Hill
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; Nathan R Jones; Tara Piché; John Stevenson
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Use of monetary and nonmonetary incentives to increase response rates among African Americans in the Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; John Stevenson; Chad Kniss; Katherine Kvale; Kim González; Eleanor Cautley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

8.  Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Gordon B Willis; Caroline C McLeod; Don A Dillman; Timothy P Johnson; Sarah M Greene; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; John Stevenson; Brendan Day; Sherrill L Sellers; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 10.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  [Quality assurance follow-up survey of the ELISA cohort study on COVID-19 prevalence: The view of study participants - What is well received?]

Authors:  Elke Peters; Aiham Alabid; Susanne Elsner; Christine Klein; Max Borsche; Jan Rupp; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2022-08-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.