Literature DB >> 21508267

Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers--a prospective study of different wear regimens.

Sylvia Jäderberg1, Ingalill Feldmann, Christer Engström.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate and compare stability after 6 months of Essix retainer use. Patients' perceptions of wearing the retainer were also evaluated. A total of 69 patients, 53 girls and 16 boys [mean age 15.7 years, standard deviation (SD) 1.96], were included in the study and randomized into two groups with different wear regimens; full-time wear for 3 months and thereafter at night (group A) compared to full-time wear for 1 week and thereafter at night only (group B). Sixty patients completed the study and thus, group A comprised 30 maxillary retainers and 18 mandibular retainers and group B 30 maxillary and 18 mandibular retainers. Little's irregularity index (LII), overjet, and overbite were measured at debond (T(1)) and after 6 months (T(2)). Differences within and between groups were analysed with a Mann-Whitney test. At T(2), all patients completed a questionnaire in order to evaluate their experience of wearing an Essix retainer and how they complied with the given instructions. Differences in LII during T(1)-T(2) were 0.44 and 0.49 mm for group A and B, respectively, but with no significant difference between the groups. There were also no significant changes in overjet and overbite within or between the groups during T(1)-T(2). According to the responses to the questionnaire, the retainer was well tolerated by the patients. It was therefore concluded that the Essix retainer is sufficient for maintaining the results after orthodontic treatment and that night-time wear is adequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508267     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Maria Kourakou; Dimitrios Kloukos; Ioannis Doulis; Smaragda Kavvadia
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Evaluation of relapse with thermoplastic retainers equipped with microsensors.

Authors:  Sait İshakoğlu; Serpil Çokakoğlu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.684

3.  Survey on Retention Protocols Among Turkish Orthodontists.

Authors:  Aylin Paşaoğlu; Işıl Aras; Ali Mert; Aynur Aras
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-01

4.  Objective assessment of patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  George Tsomos; Björn Ludwig; Johannes Grossen; Pawel Pazera; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  A two-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a multi-center randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Asma Ashari; Nik Mukhriz Nik Mustapha; Jonathan Jun Xian Yuen; Zhi Kuan Saw; May Nak Lau; Lew Xian; Alizae Marny Fadzlin Syed Mohamed; Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab; Chiew Kit Yeoh; Malathi Deva Tata; Sindhu Sinnasamy
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.247

6.  Force delivery modification of removable thermoplastic appliances using Hilliard precision thermopliers for tipping an upper central incisor.

Authors:  Bernhard Wiechens; Phillipp Brockmeyer; Teresa Erfurth-Jach; Wolfram Hahn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 7.  Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.

Authors:  Simon J Littlewood; Declan T Millett; Bridget Doubleday; David R Bearn; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

8.  A feasible method to improve adherence of Hawley retainer in adolescent orthodontic patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Feiou Lin; Hao Sun; Zhenyu Ni; Minling Zheng; Linjie Yao
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 9.  The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dalya Al-Moghrabi; Nikolaos Pandis; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols.

Authors:  Baratali Ramazanzadeh; Farzaneh Ahrari; Zahra-Sadat Hosseini
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-03-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.