Literature DB >> 2150567

Endoscopic evaluation of etodolac and naproxen, and their relative effects on gastric and duodenal prostaglandins.

R I Russell1.   

Abstract

Etodolac has been shown to have a favorable safety profile in short-term and long-term studies in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Two studies were conducted to further assess the gastrointestinal (GI) safety profile of this drug. These studies were designed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and upper GI effects of etodolac (600 mg/day) and naproxen (1000 mg/day) administered over 4 weeks in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, the relative effects of the drugs on prostaglandin levels in the stomach and duodenum were assayed in one study. Fifteen patients were included in each study and received either 300 mg b.i.d. of etodolac or 500 mg b.i.d. of naproxen. In both studies, endoscopic examinations were performed on day 1 of the study and again 4 weeks later. In the second study, at the time of each endoscopy, samples of gastric and duodenal mucosa were taken for histologic study and prostaglandin assay. Endoscopy results from the first study showed significant differences in favor of etodolac between the two treatment groups. In the second study more naproxen-treated patients had abnormal endoscopy results than did etodolac-treated patients. Results from prostaglandin assays in gastric and duodenal mucosa showed no overall suppression of gastric or duodenal prostaglandin levels for etodolac-treated patients in contrast to naproxen-treated patients, who showed suppression of PGE2 and PGI2. The results of these studies show that etodolac therapy caused less gastric and duodenal injury than naproxen and also support the theory that the GI safety of etodolac may be due to selective sparing of cytoprotective prostaglandins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2150567     DOI: 10.1007/bf02274751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  22 in total

1.  Etodolac versus naproxen in rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  C D Waltham-Weeks
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal cytoprotection by prostaglandins.

Authors:  T A Miller; E D Jacobson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy. We started it--can we stop it?

Authors:  S H Roth
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-06

4.  Postmarketing drug surveillance: are our priorities right?

Authors:  J F Fries
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Etodolac, aspirin, and placebo in patients with degenerative joint disease: a twelve-week study.

Authors:  S Y Andelman
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis by etodolac. I. Selective activities in arthritis.

Authors:  R G Neuman; B D Wilson; M Barkley; E S Kimball; B M Weichman; D D Wood
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1987-06

Review 7.  A global safety evaluation of etodolac.

Authors:  A Karbowski
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Theoretical mechanism for the gastrointestinal safety of etodolac: selective sparing of cytoprotective prostaglandins.

Authors:  D Dvornik; D K Lee
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Evaluation of the efficacy and comparative effects on gastric and duodenal mucosa of etodolac and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using endoscopy.

Authors:  A S Taha; S McLaughlin; R D Sturrock; R I Russell
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1989-08

10.  Comparison in rats of the anti-inflammatory and gastric irritant effects of etodolac with several clinically effective anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  R R Martel; J Klicius
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1982-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  COX-1 and COX-2 products in the gut: therapeutic impact of COX-2 inhibitors.

Authors:  B J Whittle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Rheumatology: 7. Basics of therapy.

Authors:  S H Huang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal damage-problems and solutions.

Authors:  R I Russell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Differences in NSAID tolerability profiles. Fact or fiction?

Authors:  K J Skeith; M Wright; P Davis
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  An evidence-based approach to prescribing NSAIDs in musculoskeletal disease: a Canadian consensus. Canadian NSAID Consensus Participants.

Authors:  H Tannenbaum; P Davis; A S Russell; M H Atkinson; W Maksymowych; S H Huang; M Bell; G A Hawker; A Juby; S Vanner; J Sibley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-Inflammatory drugs: do they really offer any advantages?

Authors:  L M Jackson; C J Hawkey
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The safety profile of sustained-release etodolac.

Authors:  M Schattenkirchner
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Estradiol treatment ameliorates acetic acid-induced gastric and colonic injuries in rats.

Authors:  Omer Günal; Berna K Oktar; Emine Ozçinar; Mustafa Sungur; Serap Arbak; Berrak Yeğen
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.092

9.  Etodolac: an overview of a selective COX-2 inhibitor.

Authors:  R A Jones
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.093

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.