Literature DB >> 2525943

Evaluation of the efficacy and comparative effects on gastric and duodenal mucosa of etodolac and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using endoscopy.

A S Taha1, S McLaughlin, R D Sturrock, R I Russell.   

Abstract

The therapeutic efficacy and upper gastrointestinal side effects of a twice daily dose of 300 mg etodolac and 500 mg naproxen were compared in 30 hospital out-patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs were taken for 4 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, single centre study. Rheumatological, endoscopic and laboratory assessments were performed at the start and on completion of the study. Mucosal lesions developed in only three (20%) patients of the etodolac group and they all had low endoscopy scores, compared to eight (53%) patients of the naproxen group with significantly worse endoscopy scores (p less than 0.05). Lesions were asymptomatic in all but one patient (on naproxen), and the gastric antrum was the commonest region involved. Of the 11 patients who developed endoscopic abnormalities in both groups, seven (64%) were moderate to heavy smokers. Etodolac had a similar antiarthritic effect to naproxen, but it appears to be better tolerated by the upper gastrointestinal mucosa as shown by endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2525943     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/28.4.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0263-7103


  10 in total

Review 1.  Etodolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states.

Authors:  J A Balfour; M M Buckley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Global safety of etodolac: reports from worldwide postmarketing surveillance studies.

Authors:  U Serni
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Endoscopic evaluation of etodolac and naproxen, and their relative effects on gastric and duodenal prostaglandins.

Authors:  R I Russell
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  A comparison of the efficacy of etodolac SR (Lodine SR) and etodolac (Lodine) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R L Dreiser
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Meta-analysis of two double-blind comparative studies with the sustained-release form of etodolac in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F Porzio
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Worldwide experience with etodolac (Lodine) 300 mg b.i.d. in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P Bacon
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Pharmacokinetics of etodolac enantiomers in the rat after administration of phenobarbital or cimetidine.

Authors:  D R Brocks; F Jamali
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

8.  : a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled multicentre study.

Authors:  H Røgind; H Bliddal; D Klokker; F Jensen
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Predicting NSAID related ulcers--assessment of clinical and pathological risk factors and importance of differences in NSAID.

Authors:  A S Taha; S Dahill; R D Sturrock; F D Lee; R I Russell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Relatively Selective COX-2 Inhibitors Versus Coxibs for the Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury.

Authors:  Man Yang; Hong-Tao Wang; Miao Zhao; Wen-Bo Meng; Jin-Qing Ou; Jun-Hui He; Bing Zou; Ping-Guang Lei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.