Literature DB >> 31981037

Testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in cancer survivors with no available cryopreserved sperm.

Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti1,2, Luciano Negri3, Annamaria Baggiani3, Emanuela Morenghi4, Elena Albani3, Carola Maria Conca Dioguardi3, Cristina Specchia3, Pasquale Patrizio5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess rates of successful testicular sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome in cancer survivors affected by non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) or retrograde ejaculation (RE)/failure of emission (FOE).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of cancer survivors who did not cryopreserve sperm prior to treatment undergoing testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Non-cancer NOA patients and neurologic RE/FOE were the control group.
RESULTS: A total of 97 cancer survivors were offered TESE and 88 (91%) accepted. Sperm was retrieved and cryopreserved in 34/67 patients with NOA (50.7%) and in 21/21 patients affected by RE/FOE (100%). Sperm retrieval rates were similar in the control group (44.9% in NOA and 100% in RE/FOE). The ICSI cumulative pregnancy rate (60%) and live birth rate (40%) per couple in 30 NOA men did not differ from controls (50.0 and 46.5%, respectively; p = 0.399/0.670). The cumulative pregnancy rate (66.7%) and live birth rate (55.6%) in 18 RE/FOE men did not differ from the control group (38.9 and 33.3%, respectively; p = 0.181/0.315). The cancer type and the resulting infertility disorder (NOA or RE/FOE) were not associated with ICSI outcomes. Female partner age was inversely related to the cumulative live birth rate, being fourfold lower (11.5%) in women ≥ 40 years and 48.8% in younger women (p = 0.0037).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of successful TESE and the ICSI outcome in cancer survivors with NOA and RE/FOE is the same as non-cancer azoospermic patients. Female partner age (older than 40 years) was associated with a significant reduction in live birth rates after TESE-ICSI procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer survivorship; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Male infertility; Testicular sperm extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31981037      PMCID: PMC7183024          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01697-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  40 in total

1.  Fertility preservation for men with testicular cancer: Is sperm cryopreservation cost effective in the era of assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Kirven Gilbert; Ajay K Nangia; James M Dupree; James F Smith; Akanksha Mehta
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  IVF outcome in azoospermic cancer survivors.

Authors:  S Dar; R Orvieto; J Levron; J Haas; Itai Gat; G Raviv
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Testicular sperm extraction combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of men with persistent azoospermia postchemotherapy.

Authors:  P T Chan; G D Palermo; L L Veeck; Z Rosenwaks; P N Schlegel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Pregnancy after electroejaculation in combination with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in a patient with idiopathic anejaculation.

Authors:  C Kiekens; C Spiessens; F Duyck; D Vandenweghe; W Coucke; D Vanderschueren
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  A P Ferraretti; A La Marca; B C J M Fauser; B Tarlatzis; G Nargund; L Gianaroli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Preserving the reproductive potential of men and boys with cancer: current concepts and future prospects.

Authors:  Herman Tournaye; Ellen Goossens; Greta Verheyen; Veerle Frederickx; Gert De Block; Paul Devroey; André Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Multiple testicular sampling in non-obstructive azoospermia--is it necessary?

Authors:  R Hauser; A Botchan; A Amit; D Ben Yosef; R Gamzu; G Paz; J B Lessing; L Yogev; H Yavetz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Fertility preservation in men with cancer.

Authors:  Herman Tournaye; Gert R Dohle; Christopher L R Barratt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Preservation of ejaculation in patients undergoing nerve-sparing postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic testicular cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Pettus; Brett S Carver; Timothy Masterson; Jason Stasi; Joel Sheinfeld
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic men submitted to bilateral orchidopexy.

Authors:  L Negri; E Albani; M DiRocco; G Morreale; P Novara; P E Levi-Setti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Late adverse effects and quality of life in survivors of testicular germ cell tumour.

Authors:  Michal Chovanec; Jakob Lauritsen; Mikkel Bandak; Christoph Oing; Gry Gundgaard Kier; Michael Kreiberg; Josephine Rosenvilde; Thomas Wagner; Carsten Bokemeyer; Gedske Daugaard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.