Frances E Aboud1, Sadika Akhter. 1. Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1. frances.aboud@mcgill.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine if a responsive stimulation and feeding intervention improved developmental and nutritional outcomes compared with a regular information-based parenting program. The hypothesis was that mothers in the intervention would exhibit better parenting skills and children would exhibit better developmental and nutritional outcomes than controls. METHODS: A cluster-randomized field trial was conducted with 302 children aged 8 to 20 months and their mothers in rural Bangladesh who were randomly assigned according to village to 1 of 3 groups. The control mothers received 12 informational sessions on health and nutrition. The intervention groups received an additional 6 sessions delivered by peer educators who included modeling and coached practice in self-feeding and verbal responsiveness with the child during play. A second intervention group received, along with the sessions, 6 months of a food powder fortified with minerals and vitamins. Developmental outcomes included the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) Inventory, mother-child responsive talk, and language development. Nutritional outcomes included weight, height, self-feeding, and mouthfuls eaten. We used analysis of covariance to compare the 3 groups at the posttest and at follow-up, covarying the pretest levels and confounders. RESULTS: At follow-up, responsive stimulation-feeding groups had better HOME inventory scores, responsive talking, language, mouthfuls eaten, and hand-washing. Micronutrient fortification resulted in more weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: A brief behavior-change program that focused on modeling and practice in stimulation and feeding was found to benefit children's nutrition and language development. Micronutrients benefited children's weight but not length.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine if a responsive stimulation and feeding intervention improved developmental and nutritional outcomes compared with a regular information-based parenting program. The hypothesis was that mothers in the intervention would exhibit better parenting skills and children would exhibit better developmental and nutritional outcomes than controls. METHODS: A cluster-randomized field trial was conducted with 302 children aged 8 to 20 months and their mothers in rural Bangladesh who were randomly assigned according to village to 1 of 3 groups. The control mothers received 12 informational sessions on health and nutrition. The intervention groups received an additional 6 sessions delivered by peer educators who included modeling and coached practice in self-feeding and verbal responsiveness with the child during play. A second intervention group received, along with the sessions, 6 months of a food powder fortified with minerals and vitamins. Developmental outcomes included the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) Inventory, mother-child responsive talk, and language development. Nutritional outcomes included weight, height, self-feeding, and mouthfuls eaten. We used analysis of covariance to compare the 3 groups at the posttest and at follow-up, covarying the pretest levels and confounders. RESULTS: At follow-up, responsive stimulation-feeding groups had better HOME inventory scores, responsive talking, language, mouthfuls eaten, and hand-washing. Micronutrient fortification resulted in more weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: A brief behavior-change program that focused on modeling and practice in stimulation and feeding was found to benefit children's nutrition and language development. Micronutrients benefited children's weight but not length.
Authors: Mark Tomlinson; Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus; Ingrid M le Roux; Maryann Youssef; Sandahl H Nelson; Aaron Scheffler; Robert E Weiss; Mary O'Connor; Carol M Worthman Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2016-11
Authors: Bishnu P Choulagai; Sharad Onta; Narayan Subedi; Dharma N Bhatta; Binjwala Shrestha; Max Petzold; Alexandra Krettek Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Shahnaz Vazir; Patrice Engle; Nagalla Balakrishna; Paula L Griffiths; Susan L Johnson; Hilary Creed-Kanashiro; Sylvia Fernandez Rao; Monal R Shroff; Margaret E Bentley Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Christine P Stewart; Lora Iannotti; Kathryn G Dewey; Kim F Michaelsen; Adelheid W Onyango Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: John P Elder; Willo Pequegnat; Saifuddin Ahmed; Gretchen Bachman; Merry Bullock; Waldemar A Carlo; Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli; Nathan A Fox; Sara Harkness; Gillian Huebner; Joan Lombardi; Velma McBride Murry; Allisyn Moran; Maureen Norton; Jennifer Mulik; Will Parks; Helen H Raikes; Joseph Smyser; Caroline Sugg; Michael Sweat; Nurper Ulkuer Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2014