Literature DB >> 21499886

Bimanual strategies for object retrieval in infants and young children.

Deirdre Birtles1, Shirley Anker, Janette Atkinson, Rhiannon Shellens, Alexandra Briscoe, Melissa Mahoney, Oliver Braddick.   

Abstract

Age differences in goal-directed bimanual coordination were studied in typically developing infants aged 9-29 months, compared to a group of children aged 4-6 years and a group of adults, using an object retrieval task. This task required one hand to open and hold the lid of a transparent box, while the second hand retrieved a small toy from inside the box. Well-coordinated retrieval strategies with differentiated use of the two hands were not established in the majority of infants until 18 months of age. Temporal analysis of the hand actions revealed that, unlike adults who perform the task with close synchronization of the hands at the start, the infants performed the task sequentially and did not activate the second hand until the first hand had started to lift the lid. The children's hand preferences for the two-hand actions also contrasted with those of adults. In children aged 27-29 months and 4-6 years, there was a preference for using the right-hand to lift the lid while in right-handed adults, the reverse pattern was observed. The results suggest that although bimanual coordination starts to develop in the second year of life, the adult pattern of performance on this task is not observed before 6 years of age. It is likely that further maturation of the brain networks involved in bimanual coordination, and in particular functional interhemispheric transfer via the corpus callosum, is required before automatization of bimanual hand actions is achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21499886     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2672-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Normal development of bilateral field advantage and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time.

Authors:  K M Hagelthorn; W S Brown; S Amano; R Asarnow
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development.

Authors:  J A Eyre; J P Taylor; F Villagra; M Smith; S Miller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Developmental change in interhemispheric communication: evidence from bimanual cost.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Franz; Sarah Fahey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-12

4.  Effects of lesions in the mesial frontal cortex on bimanual co-ordination in monkeys.

Authors:  O Kazennikov; B Hyland; U Wicki; S Perrig; E M Rouiller; M Wiesendanger
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Infants return to two-handed reaching when they are learning to walk.

Authors:  Daniela Corbetta; Kathryn E Bojczyk
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  rTMS to the supplementary motor area disrupts bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Patrick Haggard; John Taylor; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.422

7.  Planning and execution of action in children with and without developmental coordination disorder.

Authors:  M M Smyth; U C Mason
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  The development toward stereotypic arm kinematics during reaching in the first 3 years of life.

Authors:  J Konczak; J Dichgans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Age Changes in Interlimb Coupling and the Development of Bimanual Coordination.

Authors:  J Fagard; A Pezé
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 10.  The quest to understand bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Mario Wiesendanger; Deborah J Serrien
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  8 in total

1.  Differences in means-end exploration between infants at risk for autism and typically developing infants in the first 15 months of life.

Authors:  Sudha M Srinivasan; Anjana N Bhat
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.038

2.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural predictors of motor control and impact of visuo-proprioceptive information in youth.

Authors:  Sharissa H A Corporaal; Jolien Gooijers; Sima Chalavi; Boris Cheval; Stephan P Swinnen; Matthieu P Boisgontier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Toddler hand preference trajectories predict 3-year language outcome.

Authors:  Eliza L Nelson; Sandy L Gonzalez; Stefany Coxe; Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski; George F Michel
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Addressing the gap: a blueprint for studying bimanual hand preference in infants.

Authors:  Sandy L Gonzalez; Eliza L Nelson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-05

Review 6.  The Davida Teller Award Lecture, 2016: Visual Brain Development: A review of "Dorsal Stream Vulnerability"-motion, mathematics, amblyopia, actions, and attention.

Authors:  Janette Atkinson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Impact of Cerebral Visual Impairments on Motor Skills: Implications for Developmental Coordination Disorders.

Authors:  Sylvie Chokron; Gordon N Dutton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-04

8.  The Tyneside Pegboard Test: development, validation, and observations in unilateral cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Anna P Basu; Emma V Kirkpatrick; Blythe Wright; Janice E Pearse; Kate E Best; Janet A Eyre
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.449

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.