Literature DB >> 21499760

Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of cefazolin in morbidly obese patients.

Simone van Kralingen1, Margot Taks, Jeroen Diepstraten, Ewoudt M van de Garde, Eric P van Dongen, Marinus J Wiezer, Bert van Ramshorst, Bart Vlaminckx, Vera H Deneer, Catherijne A Knibbe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of cefazolin in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery, to study the influence of bodyweight measures and age on pharmacokinetic parameters and to evaluate unbound cefazolin concentrations over time in this population.
METHODS: Twenty morbidly obese patients (bodyweight 112-260 kg, body mass index 38-79 kg m(-2)) were studied following the administration of cefazolin 2 g at induction of anaesthesia. Blood samples were collected up to 4 h post-dosing to determine total and unbound plasma cefazolin concentrations. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic data analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Cefazolin clearance was 4.2 ± 1.0 L h(-1) (mean ± standard deviation) and showed a negative correlation with age (p = 0.003) but not with bodyweight measures (p > 0.05). Volume of distribution was 13.0 ± 3.1 L and correlated positively with bodyweight measures (p ≤ 0.001). Saturable protein binding was observed with a median protein binding of 79% (interquartile range 74-82), which proved similar to reported protein binding in non-obese patients. In all patients, unbound cefazolin concentrations remained above 1 mg L(-1) (minimal inhibitory concentration for 90% (MIC(90)) of methicillin-sensitive isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Europe) until 4 h post-dosing.
CONCLUSIONS: Younger age--and not bodyweight--was significantly associated with higher cefazolin clearance. However, as in all patients with bodyweights up to 260 kg, unbound plasma cefazolin concentrations remained above 1 mg L(-1) until 4 h after the intravenous administration of a 2-g dose. As such, re-dosing within 4 h or dosing with another antibiotic class should only be considered in the case of a higher MIC(90) of the local isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21499760     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-1048-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  23 in total

1.  Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Earl S Ford; Barbara A Bowman; William H Dietz; Frank Vinicor; Virginia S Bales; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  MW/Pharm, an integrated software package for drug dosage regimen calculation and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  J H Proost; D K Meijer
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Protein binding of cefazolin is saturable in vivo both between and within patients.

Authors:  Jane W A Vella-Brincat; Evan J Begg; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Mei Zhang; Stephen T Chambers; Kate Gallagher
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Eric J DeMaria
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Microanalysis of beta-lactam antibiotics and vancomycin in plasma for pharmacokinetic studies in neonates.

Authors:  Maurice J Ahsman; Enno D Wildschut; Dick Tibboel; Ron A Mathot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effects of general and local anesthesia on the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  W D Welch; J P Jantzen; K Johnson; R E Bawdon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Wagner's exact Loo-Riegelman equation: the need for a criterion to choose between the linear and logarithmic trapezoidal rule.

Authors:  J H Proost
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Measurement of adipose tissue blood flow and perfusion in man by uptake of 85Kr.

Authors:  G T Lesser; S Deutsch
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 3.531

9.  Prophylactic cefazolin in gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  W J Pories; A M van Rij; B T Burlingham; R S Fulghum; D Meelheim
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  25 in total

1.  Effect of Maternal Obesity on Maternal-Fetal Transfer of Preoperative Cefazolin at Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Stephanie McKenney Groff; Wareef Fallatah; Samuel Yang; Jamie Murphy; Christopher Crutchfield; Mark Marzinke; Joanne Kurtzberg; Carlton K K Lee; Irina Burd; Azadeh Farzin
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017 May-Jun

2.  Prediction of Clearance and Volume of Distribution in the Obese from Normal Weight Subjects : An Allometric Approach.

Authors:  Iftekhar Mahmood
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Effect of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the pharmacokinetics of oral morphine using a population approach.

Authors:  Célia Lloret-Linares; Déborah Hirt; Christophe Bardin; Jean-Luc Bouillot; Jean-Michel Oppert; Christine Poitou; François Chast; Stéphane Mouly; Jean-Michel Scherrmann; Jean-François Bergmann; Xavier Declèves
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin prophylaxis in obese gravidae at time of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Omar M Young; Imam H Shaik; Roxanna Twedt; Anna Binstock; Andrew D Althouse; Raman Venkataramanan; Hyagriv N Simhan; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in patients undergoing elective and semielective abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair surgery.

Authors:  Alexandra Douglas; Andrew A Udy; Steven C Wallis; Paul Jarrett; Janine Stuart; Melissa Lassig-Smith; Renae Deans; Michael S Roberts; Kersi Taraporewalla; Jason Jenkins; Gregory Medley; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Association between Pre-Operative Cefazolin Dose and Surgical Site Infection in Obese Patients.

Authors:  William J Peppard; David G Eberle; Nathan W Kugler; Danielle M Mabrey; John A Weigelt
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Cefazolin Dosage Adaptation in Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis Based on a Nomogram.

Authors:  Ronan Bellouard; Colin Deschanvres; Guillaume Deslandes; Éric Dailly; Nathalie Asseray; Pascale Jolliet; David Boutoille; Benjamin Gaborit; Matthieu Grégoire
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Optimal Cefazolin Prophylactic Dosing for Bariatric Surgery: No Need for Higher Doses or Intraoperative Redosing.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Collin E M Brathwaite; Alexander Barkan; Keneth Hall; Gloria Chu; Patricia Cherasard; Shan Wang; David P Nicolau; Shahidul Islam; Burke A Cunha
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Cefazolin plasma protein binding and its covariates in neonates.

Authors:  A Smits; A Kulo; R Verbesselt; G Naulaers; J de Hoon; P Vermeersch; K Allegaert
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in bariatric surgery with continuous infusion of cefazolin: determination of concentration in adipose tissue.

Authors:  Rafael Anlicoara; Álvaro A B Ferraz; Kilma da P Coelho; José L de Lima Filho; Luciana T Siqueira; José G C de Araújo; Josemberg M Campos; Edmundo M Ferraz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.