OBJECTIVE: Clinical and preclinical evidence suggests a hyperactive glutamatergic system in clinical depression. Recently, the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) has been proposed as an attractive target for novel therapeutic approaches to depression. The goal of this study was to compare mGluR5 binding (in a positron emission tomography [PET] study) and mGluR5 protein expression (in a postmortem study) between individuals with major depressive disorder and psychiatrically healthy comparison subjects. METHOD: Images of mGluR5 receptor binding were acquired using PET with [(11)C]ABP688, which binds to an allosteric site with high specificity, in 11 unmedicated individuals with major depression and 11 matched healthy comparison subjects. The amount of mGluR5 protein was investigated using Western blot in postmortem brain samples of 15 depressed individuals and 15 matched comparison subjects. RESULTS: The PET study revealed lower levels of regional mGluR5 binding in the prefrontal cortex, the cingulate cortex, the insula, the thalamus, and the hippocampus in the depression group relative to the comparison group. Severity of depression was negatively correlated with mGluR5 binding in the hippocampus. The postmortem study showed lower levels of mGluR5 protein expression in the prefrontal cortex (Brodmann's area 10) in the depression group relative to the comparison group, while prefrontal mGluR1 protein expression did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The lower levels of mGluR5 binding observed in the depression group are consonant with the lower levels of protein expression in brain tissue in the postmortem depression group. Thus, both studies suggest that basal or compensatory changes in excitatory neurotransmission play roles in the pathophysiology of major depression.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical and preclinical evidence suggests a hyperactive glutamatergic system in clinical depression. Recently, the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) has been proposed as an attractive target for novel therapeutic approaches to depression. The goal of this study was to compare mGluR5 binding (in a positron emission tomography [PET] study) and mGluR5 protein expression (in a postmortem study) between individuals with major depressive disorder and psychiatrically healthy comparison subjects. METHOD: Images of mGluR5 receptor binding were acquired using PET with [(11)C]ABP688, which binds to an allosteric site with high specificity, in 11 unmedicated individuals with major depression and 11 matched healthy comparison subjects. The amount of mGluR5 protein was investigated using Western blot in postmortem brain samples of 15 depressed individuals and 15 matched comparison subjects. RESULTS: The PET study revealed lower levels of regional mGluR5 binding in the prefrontal cortex, the cingulate cortex, the insula, the thalamus, and the hippocampus in the depression group relative to the comparison group. Severity of depression was negatively correlated with mGluR5 binding in the hippocampus. The postmortem study showed lower levels of mGluR5 protein expression in the prefrontal cortex (Brodmann's area 10) in the depression group relative to the comparison group, while prefrontal mGluR1 protein expression did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The lower levels of mGluR5 binding observed in the depression group are consonant with the lower levels of protein expression in brain tissue in the postmortem depression group. Thus, both studies suggest that basal or compensatory changes in excitatory neurotransmission play roles in the pathophysiology of major depression.
Authors: A Berthele; S Platzer; D J Laurie; S Weis; B Sommer; W Zieglgänsberger; B Conrad; T R Tölle Journal: Neuroreport Date: 1999-12-16 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Cyrill Burger; Alexandra Deschwanden; Simon Ametamey; Anass Johayem; Bruno Mancosu; Matthias Wyss; Gregor Hasler; Alfred Buck Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Pari Malherbe; James N C Kew; J Grayson Richards; Frédéric Knoflach; Claudia Kratzeisen; Marie-Thérèse Zenner; Richard L M Faull; John A Kemp; Vincent Mutel Journal: Brain Res Mol Brain Res Date: 2002-12-30
Authors: A Pilc; A Kłodzińska; P Brański; G Nowak; A Pałucha; B Szewczyk; E Tatarczyńska; E Chojnacka-Wójcik; J M Wierońska Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Courtney S Jernigan; Dharmendra B Goswami; Mark C Austin; Abiye H Iyo; Agata Chandran; Craig A Stockmeier; Beata Karolewicz Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Christine DeLorenzo; Nicole DellaGioia; Michael Bloch; Gerard Sanacora; Nabeel Nabulsi; Chadi Abdallah; Jie Yang; Ruofeng Wen; J John Mann; John H Krystal; Ramin V Parsey; Richard E Carson; Irina Esterlis Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Sophie E Holmes; Matthew J Girgenti; Margaret T Davis; Robert H Pietrzak; Nicole DellaGioia; Nabeel Nabulsi; David Matuskey; Steven Southwick; Ronald S Duman; Richard E Carson; John H Krystal; Irina Esterlis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Funda Akkus; Simon M Ametamey; Valerie Treyer; Cyrill Burger; Anass Johayem; Daniel Umbricht; Baltazar Gomez Mancilla; Judit Sovago; Alfred Buck; Gregor Hasler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: William B Mathews; Hiroto Kuwabara; Kirstie Stansfield; Heather Valentine; Mohab Alexander; Anil Kumar; John Hilton; Robert F Dannals; Dean F Wong; Fabrizio Gasparini Journal: Synapse Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 2.562