Literature DB >> 12548595

Survival of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: importance of prognostic markers of the primary tumor.

Jenny Chang1, Gary M Clark, D Craig Allred, Syed Mohsin, Gary Chamness, Richard M Elledge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with metastatic breast carcinoma have a highly variable clinical course and outcome. Intrinsic genetic heterogeneity of the primary breast tumor may play a role in this variability and may explain it in part. Therefore, the authors tested the hypothesis that the characteristics of primary breast tumors are important determinants of prognosis and survival in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma.
METHODS: The prognostic significance of the biology of the primary tumor for outcome in patients with metastatic breast disease was assessed in 346 patients with lymph node positive breast carcinoma who developed distant, recurrent disease. Traditional prognostic indicators (age, tumor size, number of involved lymph nodes, sites of recurrence, disease free interval [DFI], adjuvant treatments, estrogen receptor [ER] expression, progesterone receptor [PgR] expression, S-phase fraction [SPF], and DNA ploidy), together with three newer biologic markers (c-erbB-2, p53, and bcl-2) were assessed. Sites of recurrence were defined as nonvisceral (bone and locoregional lymph nodes) or visceral (lung, liver, brain, and other organs).
RESULTS: The median duration of survival was 17.8 months (95% confidence interval, 15.2-21.5 months). Univariate analysis showed that age > 50 years, visceral disease, and shorter DFI were associated significantly with poor outcome (P < 0.05). In addition, the molecular phenotype of the primary breast tumor was significant, with primary tumors that showed ER negativity and PgR negativity, high SPF, aneuploidy, accumulation of p53 protein, and lower bcl-2 expression, together with c-erbB-2 overexpression, all associated with a poorer clinical outcome (P < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, older age, visceral disease, shorter DFI, PgR negativity, high SPF, and lower bcl-2 expression were significant predictors of worse survival (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to traditional risk factors, bcl-2 negativity was associated significantly with a worse clinical outcome. Biologic features of primary tumors were correlated independently with outcome after first recurrence in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma and may be used as indicators of prognosis in the metastatic setting. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11083

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12548595     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  74 in total

Review 1.  Targeting BCL-2 to enhance vulnerability to therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  D Merino; S W Lok; J E Visvader; G J Lindeman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Evaluation of the prognostic significance of androgen receptor expression in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Walter Schippinger; Peter Regitnig; Nadia Dandachi; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Thomas Bauernhofer; Hellmut Samonigg; Farid Moinfar
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Exemestane versus Tamoxifen in Post-Menopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer in Germany.

Authors:  Sebastian Braun; Thomas Mittendorf; Thomas Menschik; Wolfgang Greiner; Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Effect of tumor subtype on survival and the graded prognostic assessment for patients with breast cancer and brain metastases.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Norbert Kased; David Roberge; Zhiyuan Xu; Ryan Shanley; Xianghua Luo; Penny K Sneed; Samuel T Chao; Robert J Weil; John Suh; Amit Bhatt; Ashley W Jensen; Paul D Brown; Helen A Shih; John Kirkpatrick; Laurie E Gaspar; John B Fiveash; Veronica Chiang; Jonathan P S Knisely; Christina Maria Sperduto; Nancy Lin; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Assessment of tumor characteristics and factors affecting survival in patients with primary metastatic breast carcinoma: a Multicenter Study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology.

Authors:  Ummugul Uyeturk; Berna Oksuzoglu; Tulay Akman; Ibrahim Turker; Nur Sener; Didem Tastekin; Oznur Bal; Veli Berk; Ulku Yalcintas Arslan; Zuhat Urakci; Cemil Bilir; Ugur Yilmaz; Dogan Yazilitas; Arife Ulas; Ozlem Uysal Sonmez; Burcin Budakoglu; Sener Cihan; Mukremin Uysal
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Can proton MRS provide useful information for characterizing estrogen receptor status in breast cancer?

Authors:  H-M Baek; J-H Chen; O Nalcioglu; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  [Basal and myoepithelial phenotype of metastatic mammary carcinomas. A prognostic factor in the palliative situation?].

Authors:  P Mainka; S Kahlert; T Kirchner; D Mayr; J Diebold
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Quality of life and metastatic breast cancer: the role of body image, disease site, and time since diagnosis.

Authors:  Sara I McClelland; Kathryn J Holland; Jennifer J Griggs
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Brain metastases from breast cancer: proposition of new prognostic score including molecular subtypes and treatment.

Authors:  Romuald Le Scodan; Christophe Massard; Ludivine Jouanneau; Florence Coussy; Maya Gutierrez; Youlia Kirova; Florence Lerebours; Alain Labib; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Estrogen receptor and breast MR imaging features: a correlation study.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Hyeon-Man Baek; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.