Literature DB >> 18290862

Does serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol establish a relationship between improvements in HbA1c and postprandial glucose excursions? Supportive evidence utilizing the differential effects between biphasic insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine.

A C Moses1, P Raskin, N Khutoryansky.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the relationship between changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and postprandial glucose excursions on 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) in patients with Type 2 diabetes, utilizing the differential effects between biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) or insulin glargine (IGlar) on postprandial glucose (PPG) levels.
METHODS: 1,5-AG was measured using the GlycoMark assay at baseline and after 12 and 28 weeks in the INITiation of Insulin to reach HbA(1c) Target (INITIATE) study of 233 patients randomized to either BIAsp 30 or IGlar.
RESULTS: Baseline 1,5-AG was low and not significantly different (4.9 +/- 3.5 and 4.3 +/- 2.6 microg/ml in the BIAsp 30 and IGlar groups, respectively). After 28 weeks, the levels of 1,5-AG were higher in the BIAsp 30 than in the IGlar group (13.4 vs. 11.1 microg/ml, P = 0.008) and change from baseline was 25% greater with BIAsp 30 than IGlar (8.4 vs. 6.7 microg/ml, P = 0.011). 1,5-AG levels increased as a function of decreasing HbA(1c) or the average change in postprandial plasma glucose (PPG(ave)) with significant relationships for 1,5-AG/ HbA(1c) vs. HbA(1c) or 1,5-AG/PPG(ave )vs. PPG(ave) (both P < 0.0001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: As reported in previous publications, 1,5-AG reflects ambient glycaemic control and increases with reductions in HbA(1c) and postprandial glucose. The greater reductions in postprandial excursion achieved with BiAsp 30 compared with glargine were associated with greater increases in 1,5-AG. Even moderate elevations in HbA(1c) substantially lower 1,5-AG, suggesting that it can be most discriminating in identifying patients with excessive postprandial glucose excursions at HbA(1c) levels that approach the upper end of the normal range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18290862     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02384.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of 1,5-anhydroglucitol, hemoglobin A1c, and glucose levels in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls.

Authors:  Sanjeev N Mehta; Natalie Schwartz; Jamie R Wood; Britta M Svoren; Lori Mb Laffel
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  The interrelationships of glycemic control measures: HbA1c, glycated albumin, fructosamine, 1,5-anhydroglucitrol, and continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Roy Beck; Michael Steffes; Dongyuan Xing; Katrina Ruedy; Nelly Mauras; Darrell M Wilson; Craig Kollman
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 4.866

Review 3.  Utility of different glycemic control metrics for optimizing management of diabetes.

Authors:  Klaus-Dieter Kohnert; Peter Heinke; Lutz Vogt; Eckhard Salzsieder
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-02-15

4.  The establishment of biological reference intervals of nontraditional glycemic markers in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Qiang Zhou; De-Bao Shi; Li-Ying Lv
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 5.  1,5-Anhydroglucitol in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Won Jun Kim; Cheol-Young Park
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Metabolomics based markers predict type 2 diabetes in a 14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Sabina Semiz; Sven J van der Lee; Ashley van der Spek; Aswin Verhoeven; Jan B van Klinken; Eric Sijbrands; Amy C Harms; Thomas Hankemeier; Ko Willems van Dijk; Cornelia M van Duijn; Ayşe Demirkan
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.290

7.  Measurement of 1,5-anhydroglucitol in blood and saliva: from non-targeted metabolomics to biochemical assay.

Authors:  Anna Halama; Michal Kulinski; Sara Abdul Kader; Noothan J Satheesh; Abdul Badi Abou-Samra; Karsten Suhre; Ramzi M Mohammad
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.531

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.