Literature DB >> 21494814

[Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Indications, techniques, complications and results].

B Schmidt-Rohlfing1, H Reilmann, R Pfeifer, P Kobbe, H C Pape.   

Abstract

The indications, technical principals, and results after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are presented in detail. We focus on the complications of both procedures. The benefit of vertebroplasty has been fundamentally questioned by two papers which have recently been published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Our paper discusses the present knowledge and policy about indication. The contradictory results from different studies are presented. In general, there is a lack of randomized clinical trials. Therefore, a final judgement of these two techniques is not possible. New procedures like stent-kyphoplasty or lordoplasty are briefly described. However, at present an assessment of these new techniques is impossible. A similar situation is give for the application of resorbable bone cements.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21494814     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-011-2013-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  39 in total

1.  Intraspinal leakage of bone cement after vertebroplasty: a report of 3 cases.

Authors:  M M H Teng; H Cheng; D M-T Ho; C-Y Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Lordoplasty: report on early results with a new technique for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures to restore the lordosis.

Authors:  Rene Orler; Lars H Frauchiger; Uta Lange; Paul F Heini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinical experience with high-viscosity cements for percutaneous vertebral body augmentation: occurrence, degree, and location of cement leakage compared with kyphoplasty.

Authors:  B A Georgy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Volume matters: a review of procedural details of two randomised controlled vertebroplasty trials of 2009.

Authors:  Bronek Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  A G Tohmeh; J M Mathis; D C Fenton; A M Levine; S M Belkoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Bioceramic vertebral augmentation with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite composite (Cerament SpineSupport): in vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael Rauschmann; Thomas Vogl; Akhil Verheyden; Robert Pflugmacher; Thomas Werba; Sven Schmidt; Johannes Hierholzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Rod S Taylor; Rebecca J Taylor; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Surgical removal of epidural and intradural polymethylmethacrylate extravasation complicating percutaneous vertebroplasty for an osteoporotic lumbar compression fracture. Case report.

Authors:  Scott Shapiro; Todd Abel; Scott Purvines
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Richard H Osborne; Peter R Ebeling; John D Wark; Peter Mitchell; Chris Wriedt; Stephen Graves; Margaret P Staples; Bridie Murphy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical comparison of postoperative results of balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) versus radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation (RF-TVA): a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  A Petersen; E Hartwig; E M W Koch; M Wollny
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-01

Review 2.  [Analgesic interventions for spinal diseases].

Authors:  W Reith; U Yilmaz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.635

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.