Literature DB >> 26482590

Clinical comparison of postoperative results of balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) versus radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation (RF-TVA): a prospective clinical study.

A Petersen, E Hartwig, E M W Koch, M Wollny.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are a frequent occurrence in geriatric traumatology. Differences in the achievement of pain reduction and restoration of the height of the vertebral body after balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) or radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation (RF-TVA) were to be tested on a randomized population.
METHODS: A total of 80 patients (f = 59; m = 21) with osteoporotic fractures of vertebral bodies were assigned to the groups BKP (n = 44) or RF-TVA (n = 36). The clinical analyses were compared peri- and postoperatively in a prospective study with an additional follow-up examination after 1 year.
RESULTS: The operations for BKP were bipedicular in all cases; for RF-TVA, a bipedicular access was required in only five cases (14 %) (p>0.0001). There were confirmed differences with respect to the amount of cement used (ml) between the two groups (BKP = 4.9 ± 1 vs. RFTVA= 3.4 ± 1; p<0.001). In the BKP group, the angle of kyphosis was reduced by an average of 1.65° and in the RF-TVA group by an average of 2.8° by the operation. The analysis of the maximum VAS data showed a clear postoperative reduction in the intensity of pain of approximately 4.5 cm in each of the groups with no discernible difference. After 12 months, the majority of patients in both groups (BKP = 61 % vs. RF-TVA = 83 %) reported being free of pain when at rest without a significant difference(p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A certain superiority of RF-TVA with respect to pain relief, amount of cement required, savings of operating time and personnel, and greater safety with respect to cement leakage noted in this study are consistent with other published literature. The differences between the two methods in the frequency of subsequent postoperative fractures and the secondary loss of high restoration were encouraging regarding RF-TVA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26482590     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1711-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  25 in total

1.  Major neurological complications following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate : a case report.

Authors:  K D Harrington
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  [Vertebro- and kyphoplasty for percutaneous cement augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures].

Authors:  D Boluki; J Grifka
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen monitors therapeutic effect and predicts response of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C H Chesnut; N H Bell; G S Clark; B L Drinkwater; S C English; C C Johnson; M Notelovitz; C Rosen; D F Cain; K A Flessland; N J Mallinak
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Mortality risk for operated and nonoperated vertebral fracture patients in the medicare population.

Authors:  Avram Allan Edidin; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  M A Liebschner; W S Rosenberg; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Continuing conservative care versus crossover to radiofrequency kyphoplasty: a comparative effectiveness study on the treatment of vertebral body fractures.

Authors:  Rahel Bornemann; Michael Hanna; Koroush Kabir; Hans Goost; Dieter C Wirtz; Robert Pflugmacher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Comparison of clinical and radiological data in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using radiofrequency kyphoplasty or balloon kyphoplasty].

Authors:  R Pflugmacher; R Bornemann; E M W Koch; T M Randau; J Müller-Broich; U Lehmann; O Weber; D C Wirtz; K Kabir
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 0.923

9.  Efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty for multiple synchronous and metachronous vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  L A Gray; A Ehteshami Rad; J R Gaughen; T J Kaufmann; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Robert Rotter; Heiner Martin; Sebastian Fuerderer; Michael Gabl; Christoph Roeder; Paul Heini; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the 18-month outcome after the treatment of osteoporotic insufficiency fractures by means of balloon sacroplasty (BSP) and radiofrequency sacroplasty (RFS) in comparison: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Reimer Andresen; Sebastian Radmer; Julian Ramin Andresen; Hans-Christof Schober
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Spinal fractures].

Authors:  Roland Biber; S Wicklein; H J Bail
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 3.  Comparison of radiofrequency kyphoplasty (RFK) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Jin-Ming Shen; Chun Feng; Jie Chen; Yu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Balloon Kyphoplasty versus Radiofrequency Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Marcel Winkelmann; Thassia Mavropoulos; Sebastian Decker; Mohamed Omar; Christian Krettek; Christian Walter Müller
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-09-10

Review 5.  Advances in Vertebral Augmentation Systems for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Yufeng Long; Weihong Yi; Dazhi Yang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 6.  New vertebral fractures after osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture between balloon kyphoplasty and nonsurgical treatment PRISMA.

Authors:  Hui-Min Li; Ren-Jie Zhang; Hai Gao; Chong-Yu Jia; Jian-Xiang Zhang; Fu-Long Dong; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Radiofrequency-Targeted Vertebral Augmentation: Case Report of a Patient with 7 Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Variant of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Leonard Westermann; Peer Eysel; Marvin Simons; Kourosh Zarghooni
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2017-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.