OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether, and under what conditions, informal caregiving is associated with improved self-reported physical and mental health, most notably in terms of cognitive functioning. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2008 data from the Gazel Cohort Study, which involved 10 687 men and women aged 54 to 70 years. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between self-reported health and caregiving status and burden. RESULTS: Regular caregivers with the highest burden scores reported significantly worse health status than did noncaregivers for almost all of the physical and mental outcomes evaluated after adjustment for potential confounding factors. In particular, they reported more cognitive complaints (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21, 1.73). Conversely, caregivers with the lowest burden scores reported better perceived health status, less physical and mental tiredness, and fewer depressive symptoms (OR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.37, 0.68) than did noncaregivers; however, they did not report decreases in cognitive difficulties (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.81, 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that caregiving can have positive effects on health, provided that caregiving activities themselves are not too heavy a burden.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether, and under what conditions, informal caregiving is associated with improved self-reported physical and mental health, most notably in terms of cognitive functioning. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2008 data from the Gazel Cohort Study, which involved 10 687 men and women aged 54 to 70 years. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between self-reported health and caregiving status and burden. RESULTS: Regular caregivers with the highest burden scores reported significantly worse health status than did noncaregivers for almost all of the physical and mental outcomes evaluated after adjustment for potential confounding factors. In particular, they reported more cognitive complaints (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21, 1.73). Conversely, caregivers with the lowest burden scores reported better perceived health status, less physical and mental tiredness, and fewer depressive symptoms (OR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.37, 0.68) than did noncaregivers; however, they did not report decreases in cognitive difficulties (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.81, 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that caregiving can have positive effects on health, provided that caregiving activities themselves are not too heavy a burden.
Authors: Lisa Fredman; Jane A Cauley; Suzanne Satterfield; Eleanor Simonsick; S Melinda Spencer; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Tamara B Harris Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-10-27
Authors: Marjolein E de Vugt; Jelle Jolles; Liesbeth van Osch; Fred Stevens; Pauline Aalten; Richel Lousberg; Frans R J Verhey Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Stephanie L Brown; Dylan M Smith; Richard Schulz; Mohammed U Kabeto; Peter A Ubel; Michael Poulin; Jaehee Yi; Catherine Kim; Kenneth M Langa Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2009-03-20
Authors: David L Roth; William E Haley; Martha Hovater; Martinique Perkins; Virginia G Wadley; Suzanne Judd Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Andrea L Rosso; Brian K Lee; Marcia L Stefanick; Candyce H Kroenke; Laura H Coker; Nancy F Woods; Yvonne L Michael Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Antoine Messiah; Jérôme Lacoste; Erick Gokalsing; James M Shultz; Pura Rodríguez de la Vega; Grettel Castro; Juan M Acuna Journal: South Med J Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Kristin Litzelman; Halcyon G Skinner; Ronald E Gangnon; F Javier Nieto; Kristen Malecki; Whitney P Witt Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Kristin Litzelman; Halcyon G Skinner; Ronald E Gangnon; F Javier Nieto; Kristen Malecki; Whitney P Witt Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 4.147