Andrea L Rosso1, Brian K Lee2, Marcia L Stefanick3, Candyce H Kroenke4, Laura H Coker5, Nancy F Woods6, Yvonne L Michael2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. alr143@pitt.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 4. Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California. 5. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina. 6. School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Informal caregiving is common for older women and can negatively affect health, but its impact on physical function remains unclear. Using inverse probability weighting methods, we quantified the association of caregiving with physical function over 6 years. METHODS: Study participants were 5,649 women aged 65 years and older at baseline of the Woman's Health Initiative Clinical Trial (multicenter recruitment, 1993-1998) with complete caregiving data and function at baseline and at least one follow-up. Caregiving was self-reported (low-frequency if ≤2 times per week and high-frequency if ≥3 times per week). Performance-based measures of physical function including timed walk (meters/second), grip strength (kilograms), and chair stands (number) were measured at baseline and years 1, 3, and 6. Associations and 95% confidence intervals of baseline caregiving with physical function were estimated by generalized estimating equations with inverse probability weighting by propensity and attrition scores, calculated by logistic regression of baseline health and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Over follow-up, low-frequency caregivers had higher grip strength when compared with noncaregivers (mean difference = 0.63kg, confidence interval: 0.24, 1.01). There were no observed differences between high-frequency caregivers and noncaregivers on grip strength or for either caregiver group when compared with noncaregivers on walk speed or chair stands. Rates of change in physical function measures did not differ by caregiving status. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiving was not associated with poorer physical function in this sample of older women. Low-frequency caregiving was associated with better grip strength at baseline which persisted through follow-up. This study supports the concept that informal caregiving may not have universally negative health consequences.
BACKGROUND: Informal caregiving is common for older women and can negatively affect health, but its impact on physical function remains unclear. Using inverse probability weighting methods, we quantified the association of caregiving with physical function over 6 years. METHODS: Study participants were 5,649 women aged 65 years and older at baseline of the Woman's Health Initiative Clinical Trial (multicenter recruitment, 1993-1998) with complete caregiving data and function at baseline and at least one follow-up. Caregiving was self-reported (low-frequency if ≤2 times per week and high-frequency if ≥3 times per week). Performance-based measures of physical function including timed walk (meters/second), grip strength (kilograms), and chair stands (number) were measured at baseline and years 1, 3, and 6. Associations and 95% confidence intervals of baseline caregiving with physical function were estimated by generalized estimating equations with inverse probability weighting by propensity and attrition scores, calculated by logistic regression of baseline health and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Over follow-up, low-frequency caregivers had higher grip strength when compared with noncaregivers (mean difference = 0.63kg, confidence interval: 0.24, 1.01). There were no observed differences between high-frequency caregivers and noncaregivers on grip strength or for either caregiver group when compared with noncaregivers on walk speed or chair stands. Rates of change in physical function measures did not differ by caregiving status. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiving was not associated with poorer physical function in this sample of older women. Low-frequency caregiving was associated with better grip strength at baseline which persisted through follow-up. This study supports the concept that informal caregiving may not have universally negative health consequences.
Authors: David L Roth; Martinique Perkins; Virginia G Wadley; Ella M Temple; William E Haley Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Graziano Onder; Brenda W J H Penninx; Pablo Lapuerta; Linda P Fried; Glenn V Ostir; Jack M Guralnik; Marco Pahor Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Deepika R Laddu; Betsy C Wertheim; David O Garcia; Nancy F Woods; Michael J LaMonte; Bertha Chen; Hoda Anton-Culver; Oleg Zaslavsky; Jane A Cauley; Rowan Chlebowski; JoAnn E Manson; Cynthia A Thomson; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Patrick Janson; Kristina Willeke; Lisa Zaibert; Andrea Budnick; Anne Berghöfer; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Peter U Heuschmann; Andreas Zapf; Manfred Wildner; Carolin Stupp; Thomas Keil Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 4.614