Literature DB >> 21493868

The sensitivity of [11C]choline PET/CT to localize prostate cancer depends on the tumor configuration.

Michael Souvatzoglou1, Gregor Weirich, Sarah Schwarzenboeck, Tobias Maurer, Tibor Schuster, Ralph Alexander Bundschuh, Matthias Eiber, Ken Herrmann, Hubert Kuebler, Hans Juergen Wester, Heinz Hoefler, Juergen Gschwend, Markus Schwaiger, Uwe Treiber, Bernd Joachim Krause.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dependency of the sensitivity of [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for detecting and localizing primary prostate cancer (PCa) on tumor configuration in the histologic specimen. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Forty-three patients with biopsy-proven PCa were included. They underwent radical prostatectomy within 31 days after [(11)C]choline PET/CT. The transaxial image slices and the histologic specimens were analyzed by comparing the respective slices. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) were calculated in each segment and correlated with histopathology. The tumor configuration in the histologic specimen was grouped as: I, unifocal; II, multifocal; III, rind-like shaped; IV, size <5 mm. Data analysis included the investigation of detection of PCa by SUV(max), the assessment of the influence of potential contributing factors on tumor prediction, and the evaluation of whether SUV could discriminate cancer tissue from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis, HGPIN (high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasm), or normal prostate tissue. General estimation equation models were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Tumor configuration in histology was classified as I in 21 patients, as II in 9, as III in 5, and as IV in 8. The prostate segment involved by cancer is identified in 79% of the patients. SUV(max) was located in the same side of the prostate in 95% of patients. Tumor configuration was the only factor significantly negatively influencing tumor prediction (P < 0.001). PCa-SUV(max) (median SUV(max) = 4.9) was not significantly different from BPH-SUV (median SUV(max) = 4.5) and prostatitis-SUV (median SUV(max) = 3.9), P = 0.102 and P = 0.054, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The detection and localization of PCa in the prostate with [(11)C]choline PET/CT is impaired by tumor configuration. Additionally, in our patient population, PCa tissue could not be distinguished from benign pathologies in the prostate. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21493868     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  46 in total

Review 1.  GCPII imaging and cancer.

Authors:  C A Foss; R C Mease; S Y Cho; H J Kim; M G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  PET/MR in prostate cancer: technical aspects and potential diagnostic value.

Authors:  Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias Eiber; Axel Martinez-Moeller; Sebastian Fürst; Konstantin Holzapfel; Tobias Maurer; Sibylle Ziegler; Stephan Nekolla; Markus Schwaiger; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Writing PET into existence.

Authors:  A Chiti; M Kirienko; E Incerti; M Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Do we have to withdraw antiandrogenic therapy in prostate cancer patients before PET/CT with [11C]choline?

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  ¹⁸F-DCFBC PET/CT for PSMA-Based Detection and Characterization of Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Kenneth L Gage; Sheila F Faraj; Katarzyna J Macura; Toby C Cornish; Nilda Gonzalez-Roibon; Gunes Guner; Enrico Munari; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich; Misop Han; H Ballentine Carter; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Amanda Blackford; Daniel Holt; Robert F Dannals; George J Netto; Martin A Lodge; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  68Ga-PSMA-PET: added value and future applications in comparison to the current use of choline-PET and mpMRI in the workup of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Simona Malaspina; Ugo De Giorgi; Jukka Kemppainen; Angelo Del Sole; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Tumour volume delineation in prostate cancer assessed by [11C]choline PET/CT: validation with surgical specimens.

Authors:  Ralph A Bundschuh; Christina M Wendl; Gregor Weirich; Mathias Eiber; Michael Souvatzoglou; Uwe Treiber; Hubert Kübler; Tobias Maurer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hans Geinitz; Anca L Grosu; Sibylle I Ziegler; Bernd Joachim Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.