| Literature DB >> 21489281 |
D Katharine Coykendall1, Shannon B Johnson, Stephen A Karl, Richard A Lutz, Robert C Vrijenhoek.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep-sea hydrothermal vent animals occupy patchy and ephemeral habitats supported by chemosynthetic primary production. Volcanic and tectonic activities controlling the turnover of these habitats contribute to demographic instability that erodes genetic variation within and among colonies of these animals. We examined DNA sequences from one mitochondrial and three nuclear gene loci to assess genetic diversity in the siboglinid tubeworm, Riftia pachyptila, a widely distributed constituent of vents along the East Pacific Rise and Galápagos Rift.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21489281 PMCID: PMC3100261 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-96
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Habitat instability and genetic diversity in . (A) A healthy patch of tubeworms at the N27 locality. (B) An adjacent senescent patch on a rust-colored sulfide mound covered with numerous scavengers, the galatheid squat lobster Munidopsis subsquamosa. (C) Riftia pachyptila samples: blue and red dots indicate northern and southern sample locations; gray dots indicate active vents known to host R. pachyptila but not included in present analyses; white dots denote active vents that did not host substantial R. pachyptila colonies during the times of our expeditions; and white diamonds denote vents that did not support R. pachyptila colonies. Tectonic spreading rates are indicated along arrows for each location. (D) Allelic frequencies at four loci. Colors are coded to adjacent haplotype networks (black wedges are singletons). (E) Structure plots for the mean probability of assignment of individuals (Q values) to the northern cluster (blue) versus the southern cluster (white). (F) Haplotype networks for six genetic markers. Area of circle is proportional to the frequency of each haplotype, and straight lines denote single nucleotide differences.
Coordinates and depths for Riftia pachyptil a samples.
| Locality | Depths (m) | Sampling dates | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAR | 0.8 | -86.2 | 2460-2461 | A2005-21, A2224 | 4-1998, 5-1990 | 20 |
| N27 | 27.0 | -111.4 | 1993-2019 | A3517-21, T549-51 | 1-2000, 4-2003 | 33 |
| N21 | 20.8 | -109.1 | 2577-2615 | A2230-33, T556-7 | 6-1990, 6-2003 | 54 |
| N9 | 9.8 | -104.2 | 2550-2518 | A2351, A3540 | 4-1991, 4-2000 | 19 |
| S7 | -7.4 | -104.8 | 2746-2747 | A3320-21 | 12-1998 | 19 |
| S11 | -11.3 | -110.5 | 2791 | A3323 | 12-1998 | 22 |
| S17 | -17.4 | -113.2 | 2582-2599 | A3328-30 | 12-1999 | 22 |
| S23 | -23.8 | -115.5 | 2649 | A4097 | 4-2005 | 1 |
| S32 | -31.2 | -111.9 | 2333-2338 | A3338-41 | 1-1999 | 9 |
1 Positive number indicates north latitudes, negative numbers south latitudes and west longitudes.
2 Submersible dive numbers: A = HOV Alvin; and T = ROV Tiburon.
3 Sample size.
Indices of genic diversity in Riftia pachyptila samples.
| Locality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. alleles ( | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Gene diversity ( | 0.211 | 0.189 | 0.337 | 0.214 | 0.108 | 0 | 0 | |
| No. alleles ( | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Gene diversity ( | 0.674 | 0.660 | 0.647 | 0.446 | 0.157 | 0.198 | 0.258 | 0.242 |
| Fixation index | 0.155 | 0.073 | 0.108 | 0.200 | -0.063 | -0.067 | 0.324 | -0.037 |
| No. alleles ( | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Gene diversity ( | 0.632 | 0.650 | 0.494 | 0.272 | 0.475 | 0.136 | 0.224 | 0.111 |
| Fixation index | -0.124 | -0.067 | -0.068 | -0.095 | 0.304 | -0.053 | -0.118 | 0.000 |
| No. alleles ( | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Gene diversity ( | 0.492 | 0.374 | 0.149 | 0.445 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fixation index | 0.098 | 0.092 | -0.059 | 0.309 | ||||
| Pr(total | 0.404 | 0.600 | 0.383 | 0.255 | 0.176 | 0.230 | 0.461 | 1.000 |
| Mean of | 0.450 | 0.474 | 0.370 | 0.375 | 0.211 | 0.110 | 0.121 | 0.082 |
| s.d. of | 0.310 | 0.219 | 0.240 | 0.086 | 0.197 | 0.083 | 0.140 | 0.081 |
| Total alleles ( | 11 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Allelic richness ( | 2.37 | 2.89 | 2.50 | 2.57 | 1.90 | 1.68 | 1.48 | 1.72 |
| Private alleles 4 | 0.14 | 0.65 | 0.08 | 0.40 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
1 Number of gene sequences.
4 Rarefaction estimates of mean allelic richness and mean number of private alleles per locus.
Figure 2Correlation of genetic differentiation with geographic distances among eight sample localities. Negative values for F(Table 3) were set to zero prior to adjustment. Black dots denote contrasts between populations from the northern and southern clusters. White dots denote contrasts within clusters.
Pairwise estimates of F(lower triangle) and geographic distances in km (upper triangle).
| N27 | N21 | N9 | GAR | S7 | S11 | S17 | S32 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N27 | 724 | 2050 | 3963 | 3846 | 4259 | 4942 | 6465 | |
| N21 | 1327 | 3335 | 3144 | 3576 | 4276 | 5787 | ||
| N9 | 2234 | 1957 | 2449 | 3184 | 4629 | |||
| GAR | 2562 | 3003 | 3581 | 4469 | ||||
| S7 | 0.045 | 753 | 1256 | 2673 | ||||
| S11 | 738 | 2211 | ||||||
| S17 | 0.060 | -0.021 | 1532 | |||||
| S32 | -0.034 | -0.015 |
Bold values are statistically significant at the α = 0.05.
Figure 3Correlation of expected heterozygosity with tectonic spreading rates (= 0.788, . Allelic richness exhibits essentially the same relationship (R= 0.730, P = 0.0069). Black squares are NEPR populations, white squares are SEPR samples and the white circle is the GAR population.
Correlations between geographical and genetic measures for all eight samples including GAR (below diagonal) and for the seven EPR samples alone (above diagonal).
| Private | Depth | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene diversity ( | - | 0.5195 | 0.3306 | 0.0924 | |||
| Allelic richness ( | - | 0.6906 | 0.4267 | 0.0046 | |||
| Private alleles | 0.4779 | 0.6519 | - | -0.4080 | 0.3461 | 0.1150 | 0.0115 |
| Spreading rate | -0.5044 | - | -0.1841 | -0.0117 | |||
| Latitude | 0.3398 | - | 0.1534 | 0.1709 | |||
| Longitude | 0.3630 | 0.4781 | 0.3408 | -0.6388 | 0.2842 | - | -0.1177 |
| Depth | 0.0069 | -0.1017 | -0.0900 | 0.1883 | 0.1925 | 0.4136 | - |
Significant correlations (Prob. Spearman's ρ ≤ 0.01) in boldface.
Genic diversity in northern and southern population clusters.
| Locus | Cluster | Number of alleles | Allelic diversity | Nucleotide diversity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | 5 | 0.357 | 0.178 | -1.871 | 0.158 | |
| South | 3 | 0.098 | 0.040 | -2.562 | 0.005 | |
| North | 6 | 0.640 | 0.185 | -0.476 | 0.449 | |
| South | 4 | 0.218 | 0.052 | -2.205 | 0.108 | |
| North | 9 | 0.621 | 0.208 | -2.704 | 0.166 | |
| South | 3 | 0.258 | 0.118 | 0.791 | 0.605 | |
| North | 2 | 0.427 | nd | nd | nd | |
| South | 1 | 0 | nd | nd | nd |
1 nd: not determined because data were obtained from RFLPs.