Literature DB >> 21487844

Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex™ hernia patch.

T Tollens1, M Den Hondt, K Devroe, C Terry, S Speybroeck, C Aelvoet, J-P Vanrykel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the long-term recurrence and complication rates following small abdominal wall hernia repair with the Ventralex hernia patch. The study also aimed to identify risk factors for hernia recurrence in patients undergoing such repair and to examine the relationship between quality of life and hernia recurrence.
BACKGROUND: Hernia repair using prosthetic mesh materials has become the preferred method of repair, as the recurrence rates are much lower than with conventional repair techniques. The prevention of long-term complications and improvements in the quality of life should also be considered as important features of successful repair. The Ventralex patch is a bilayer prosthesis, designed for retromuscular or intraperitoneal placement. Currently, seven studies have evaluated the device for small ventral hernia repair, and all have shown low short- and long-term recurrence rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 176 patients who underwent abdominal wall hernia repair using the Ventralex patch between May 2004 and February 2009 were reviewed. All patients were followed up after 1 month and later in 2010. The rate of recurrence, immediate postoperative and long-term complications, and quality of life were evaluated.
RESULTS: Long-term follow-up data were available for 135 patients. The mean follow-up was 49 months (range 13-70 months). There were 12 hernia recurrences (8.9%) during this time. Postoperative (1-month) complications included seroma (4%), superficial surgical site infections (3%), and an abscess (1.5%). At the mean long-term follow-up, complications included infection (1.5%) and subobstruction (1.5%). The only risk factor for hernia recurrence was female gender (unadjusted odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.72, P = 0.02). Patients with hernia recurrence reported significantly lower quality of life scores than patients without recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: The Ventralex hernia patch offers a simple and quick means of repairing small abdominal wall hernias. A relatively high recurrence rate was observed in this study. Reviewing the available literature, a critical appraisal is needed, attention should be paid to follow the correct implantation technique, proper deployment technology should be used, and a lightweight version would be welcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487844     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0816-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  24 in total

1.  [Long-term results after Spitzy's umbilical hernia repair].

Authors:  O P Schumacher; C Peiper; M Lörken; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Introducing the Proceed Ventral Patch as a new device in surgical management of umbilical and small ventral hernias: preliminary results.

Authors:  Tim Tollens; David Struyve; Chris Aelvoet; Jean Pierre Vanrijkel
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2010-04

Review 3.  The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair.

Authors:  Bernd Klosterhalfen; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Abdominal wall hernia repair with a composite ePTFE/polypropylene mesh: clinical outcome and quality of life in 152 patients.

Authors:  E Iversen; A Lykke; M Hensler; L N Jorgensen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Surgeon perspectives on options for ventral abdominal wall hernia repair: results of a postal questionnaire.

Authors:  P Witherspoon; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias.

Authors:  P Sanjay; T D Reid; E L Davies; P J Arumugam; A Woodward
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Post-laparoscopic mesh in post-menopausal umbilical hernia repair: a case series.

Authors:  Andrea Tinelli; Antonio Malvasi; Corrado Manca; Giovanni Alemanno; Stefano Bettocchi; Tahar Benhidjeb
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.442

8.  More than 150 consecutive open umbilical hernia repairs in a major Veterans Administration Medical Center.

Authors:  Buckminster Farrow; Samir Awad; David H Berger; Daniel Albo; Liz Lee; Anu Subramanian; Charles F Bellows
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence.

Authors:  Linas Venclauskas; Jolita Silanskaite; Mindaugas Kiudelis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Edward Mason; Titus Duncan; Russell Wilson; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  18 in total

1.  Umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  J L Porrero; O Cano-Valderrama; S Villar; C Sánchez-Cabezudo; B Ramos; B Porrero; M Cendrero; O Bonachia; A J Torres
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs.

Authors:  J Dalenbäck; C Andersson; D Ribokas; G Rimbäck
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  A Collective Review on Mesh-Based Repair of Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias.

Authors:  Jeroen E H Ponten; Irene Thomassen; Simon W Nienhuijs
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Bowel obstruction secondary to migration of a Ventralex mesh: report of a rare complication.

Authors:  D Tsapralis; G Vasiliades; Z Zaxou; M Delimpaltadaki; T H Margetousakis; H Papadakis; A Machairas; E P Misiakos
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Primary uncomplicated midline ventral hernias: factors that influence and guide the surgical approach.

Authors:  H Alkhatib; A Fafaj; M Olson; T Stewart; D M Krpata
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Surgical outcome of mesh and suture repair in primary umbilical hernia: postoperative complications and recurrence.

Authors:  A Winsnes; M M Haapamäki; U Gunnarsson; K Strigård
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Single centre observational study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Proceed™ Ventral Patch to repair small ventral hernias.

Authors:  J Bontinck; I Kyle-Leinhase; P Pletinckx; V Vergucht; R Beckers; F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?

Authors:  S Van Hoef; T Tollens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Infection and recurrence rates of the C-QUR V-Patch in ventral hernia repairs.

Authors:  D Cheng; L Bonato; C Leinkram
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Intra Peritoneal Polypropylene Mesh and Newer Meshes in Ventral Hernia Repair: What EBM Says?

Authors:  H K Ramakrishna; K Lakshman
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.