Literature DB >> 26396470

A Collective Review on Mesh-Based Repair of Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias.

Jeroen E H Ponten1, Irene Thomassen1, Simon W Nienhuijs1.   

Abstract

In accordance with the tension-free principles for other hernias, umbilical and epigastric hernia repair should probably be mesh-based. The number of randomized studies is increasing, most of them showing significantly less recurrences with the use of a mesh. Different devices are available and are applicable by several approaches. The objective of this review was to evaluate recent literature for the different types of mesh for umbilical and epigastric hernia repair and recurrences after mesh repair. A multi-database search was conducted to reveal relevant studies since 2001 reporting mesh-based repair of primary umbilical/epigastric hernia and their outcomes in adult patients. A total of 20 studies were included, 15 of them solely involved umbilical hernias, whereas the remaining studies included epigastric hernias as well. A median of 124 patients (range, 17-384) was investigated per study. Three quarters of the included studies had a follow-up of at least 2 years. Six studies described the results of laparoscopic approach, of which one reported a recurrence rate of 2.7 %; in the remaining studies, no recurrences occurred. Two comparative studies reported a lower incidence of complications and postoperative pain after laparoscopic repair compared to open repair. Seventeen studies reported results of open techniques, of which seven studies showed no recurrence. Other studies reported recurrence rates up to 3.1 %. A wide range of complication rates were reported (0-33 %). This collective review showed acceptable recurrence rates for mesh-based umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. A wide range of devices was investigated. A tendency toward more complications after laparoscopic repair was found compared to open repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epigastric hernia repair; Laparoscopy; Mesh; Mesh herniorraphy; Recurrence; Umbilical hernia repair

Year:  2013        PMID: 26396470      PMCID: PMC4571520          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-0920-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  31 in total

Review 1.  Small-bowel disorders and abdominal wall hernia in the elderly patient.

Authors:  R A Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Umbilical and ventral herniorrhaphy: a review of 1000 cases. I. Characteristics which predict surgical results and predisposing factors.

Authors:  A A Musca
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1967-08

3.  Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias.

Authors:  P Sanjay; T D Reid; E L Davies; P J Arumugam; A Woodward
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience.

Authors:  Massimo Asolati; Sergio Huerta; George Sarosi; Rhonda Harmon; Christopher Bell; Thomas Anthony
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  More than 150 consecutive open umbilical hernia repairs in a major Veterans Administration Medical Center.

Authors:  Buckminster Farrow; Samir Awad; David H Berger; Daniel Albo; Liz Lee; Anu Subramanian; Charles F Bellows
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience.

Authors:  M E Franklin; J J Gonzalez; J L Glass; A Manjarrez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Laparoscopic correction of umbilical hernias using a transabdominal preperitoneal approach: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Denise E Hilling; Linetta B Koppert; Richard Keijzer; Laurents P S Stassen; I Hok Oei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.

Authors:  Ulrike Muschaweck
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'.

Authors:  Tracy Merlin; Adele Weston; Rebecca Tooher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Edward Mason; Titus Duncan; Russell Wilson; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?

Authors:  S Van Hoef; T Tollens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  What is the reality in epigastric hernia repair?-a trend analysis from the Herniamed Registry.

Authors:  F Köckerling; D Adolf; K Zarras; R Fortelny; R Lorenz; B Lammers; W Reinpold; B Stechemesser; C Schug-Pass; D Weyhe
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Local anaesthetic repair of paraumbilical hernia as a safe option across a range of body mass indices.

Authors:  I D Sadien; Y M Ho; E Coveney
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Incarcerated Epigastric Hernia.

Authors:  Snehasis Das; Oseen Shaikh; Naveen Kumar Gaur; Gopal Balasubramanian
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-08

5.  Incisional abdominal hernia repair with concomitant abdominoplasty: Maintaining umbilical viability.

Authors:  Robert Phan; Elan Kaplan; Jemma K Porrett; Yik-Hong Ho; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2018-04-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.