I Petersen1, M M F Nielsen, H Beck-Nielsen, K Christensen. 1. The Danish Twin Registry, Danish Aging Research Center, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9B st.tv., 5000 Odense C, Denmark. ipetersen@health.sdu.dk
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Previous Danish twin studies have found a highly increased risk of precursors of type 2 diabetes as well as a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes among twins compared with singletons. Likewise, small-scale studies of Danish twins have shown that monozygotic twins have a higher risk of developing precursors of type 2 diabetes compared with dizygotic twins. In the present register-based study, the 10 year period diabetes prevalence in Danish twins is compared with that in a random sample of Danish citizens. Furthermore, the 10 year period prevalence of diabetes in monozygotic twins is compared with that in dizygotic twins. METHODS: The study population consisted of twins (n = 77,885) identified in the Danish Twin Registry, and a 5% random sample (n = 215,264) from the birth cohorts 1910-1989. We identified diabetes patients by means of three nationwide Danish health registers. RESULTS: The number of identified diabetes cases among males was 6,677 (6.24%) for singletons vs 2,271 (5.68%) for twins (difference = 0.56% [0.29-0.83%]). The number among females was 6,143 (5.67%) for singletons and 1,722 (4.54%) for twins (difference = 1.13% [0.88-0.38%]). Restriction to various birth cohorts, known zygosity and known type 2 diabetes did not alter the overall conclusions. The difference between monozygotic twins (males, 5.29%; females, 4.40%) and dizygotic twins (males, 5.77%; females, 4.63%) was non-significant. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Danish twins do not have an increased risk of developing diabetes compared with singletons, and the risk of diabetes among monozygotic twins does not differ from that of dizygotic twins.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Previous Danish twin studies have found a highly increased risk of precursors of type 2 diabetes as well as a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes among twins compared with singletons. Likewise, small-scale studies of Danish twins have shown that monozygotic twins have a higher risk of developing precursors of type 2 diabetes compared with dizygotic twins. In the present register-based study, the 10 year period diabetes prevalence in Danish twins is compared with that in a random sample of Danish citizens. Furthermore, the 10 year period prevalence of diabetes in monozygotic twins is compared with that in dizygotic twins. METHODS: The study population consisted of twins (n = 77,885) identified in the Danish Twin Registry, and a 5% random sample (n = 215,264) from the birth cohorts 1910-1989. We identified diabetespatients by means of three nationwide Danish health registers. RESULTS: The number of identified diabetes cases among males was 6,677 (6.24%) for singletons vs 2,271 (5.68%) for twins (difference = 0.56% [0.29-0.83%]). The number among females was 6,143 (5.67%) for singletons and 1,722 (4.54%) for twins (difference = 1.13% [0.88-0.38%]). Restriction to various birth cohorts, known zygosity and known type 2 diabetes did not alter the overall conclusions. The difference between monozygotic twins (males, 5.29%; females, 4.40%) and dizygotic twins (males, 5.77%; females, 4.63%) was non-significant. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Danish twins do not have an increased risk of developing diabetes compared with singletons, and the risk of diabetes among monozygotic twins does not differ from that of dizygotic twins.
Authors: M Lehtovirta; K H Pietiläinen; E Levälahti; K Heikkilä; L Groop; K Silventoinen; M Koskenvuo; J Kaprio Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-04-17 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Unni Dokkedal; Tom G Hansen; Lars S Rasmussen; Jonas Mengel-From; Kaare Christensen Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: M Frankowiack; R-M Kovanen; G A Repasky; C K Lim; C Song; N L Pedersen; L Hammarström Journal: Genes Immun Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 2.676
Authors: Anders J Svendsen; Kirsten O Kyvik; Gunnar Houen; Christian Nielsen; René Holst; Axel Skytthe; Peter Junker Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Axel Skytthe; Lene Christiansen; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Frans L Bødker; Lars Hvidberg; Inge Petersen; Morten M F Nielsen; Paul Bingley; Jacob Hjelmborg; Qihua Tan; Niels V Holm; James W Vaupel; Matt McGue; Kaare Christensen Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: M Frost; I Petersen; K Brixen; H Beck-Nielsen; J J Holst; L Christiansen; K Højlund; K Christensen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Jeffrey J Beck; René Pool; Margot van de Weijer; Xu Chen; Eva Krapohl; Scott D Gordon; Marianne Nygaard; Birgit Debrabant; Teemu Palviainen; Matthijs D van der Zee; Bart Baselmans; Casey T Finnicum; Lu Yi; Sebastian Lundström; Toos van Beijsterveldt; Lene Christiansen; Kauko Heikkilä; Julie Kittelsrud; Anu Loukola; Miina Ollikainen; Kaare Christensen; Nicholas G Martin; Robert Plomin; Michel Nivard; Meike Bartels; Conor Dolan; Gonneke Willemsen; Eco de Geus; Catarina Almqvist; Patrik K E Magnusson; Hamdi Mbarek; Erik A Ehli; Dorret I Boomsma; Jouke-Jan Hottenga Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Line D Rasmussen; Elisabeth R Mathiesen; Gitte Kronborg; Court Pedersen; Jan Gerstoft; Niels Obel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aline Jelenkovic; Yoshie Yokoyama; Reijo Sund; Chika Honda; Leonie H Bogl; Sari Aaltonen; Fuling Ji; Feng Ning; Zengchang Pang; Juan R Ordoñana; Juan F Sánchez-Romera; Lucia Colodro-Conde; S Alexandra Burt; Kelly L Klump; Sarah E Medland; Grant W Montgomery; Christian Kandler; Tom A McAdams; Thalia C Eley; Alice M Gregory; Kimberly J Saudino; Lise Dubois; Michel Boivin; Adam D Tarnoki; David L Tarnoki; Claire M A Haworth; Robert Plomin; Sevgi Y Öncel; Fazil Aliev; Maria A Stazi; Corrado Fagnani; Cristina D'Ippolito; Jeffrey M Craig; Richard Saffery; Sisira H Siribaddana; Matthew Hotopf; Athula Sumathipala; Fruhling Rijsdijk; Timothy Spector; Massimo Mangino; Genevieve Lachance; Margaret Gatz; David A Butler; Gombojav Bayasgalan; Danshiitsoodol Narandalai; Duarte L Freitas; José Antonio Maia; K Paige Harden; Elliot M Tucker-Drob; Bia Kim; Youngsook Chong; Changhee Hong; Hyun Jung Shin; Kaare Christensen; Axel Skytthe; Kirsten O Kyvik; Catherine A Derom; Robert F Vlietinck; Ruth J F Loos; Wendy Cozen; Amie E Hwang; Thomas M Mack; Mingguang He; Xiaohu Ding; Billy Chang; Judy L Silberg; Lindon J Eaves; Hermine H Maes; Tessa L Cutler; John L Hopper; Kelly Aujard; Patrik K E Magnusson; Nancy L Pedersen; Anna K Dahl Aslan; Yun-Mi Song; Sarah Yang; Kayoung Lee; Laura A Baker; Catherine Tuvblad; Morten Bjerregaard-Andersen; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Morten Sodemann; Kauko Heikkilä; Qihua Tan; Dongfeng Zhang; Gary E Swan; Ruth Krasnow; Kerry L Jang; Ariel Knafo-Noam; David Mankuta; Lior Abramson; Paul Lichtenstein; Robert F Krueger; Matt McGue; Shandell Pahlen; Per Tynelius; Glen E Duncan; Dedra Buchwald; Robin P Corley; Brooke M Huibregtse; Tracy L Nelson; Keith E Whitfield; Carol E Franz; William S Kremen; Michael J Lyons; Syuichi Ooki; Ingunn Brandt; Thomas Sevenius Nilsen; Fujio Inui; Mikio Watanabe; Meike Bartels; Toos C E M van Beijsterveldt; Jane Wardle; Clare H Llewellyn; Abigail Fisher; Esther Rebato; Nicholas G Martin; Yoshinori Iwatani; Kazuo Hayakawa; Joohon Sung; Jennifer R Harris; Gonneke Willemsen; Andreas Busjahn; Jack H Goldberg; Finn Rasmussen; Yoon-Mi Hur; Dorret I Boomsma; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Jaakko Kaprio; Karri Silventoinen Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 1.587