Literature DB >> 23274656

A demonstration of the generalizability of twin-based research on antisocial behavior.

J C Barnes1, Brian B Boutwell.   

Abstract

Researchers typically analyze samples of twin pairs in order to decompose trait variance into genetic and environmental components. This methodological technique, referred to as twin-based research, rests on several assumptions that must be satisfied in order to produce unbiased results. While research has analyzed the tenability of certain assumptions such as equal environments, less attention has been given to whether results gleaned from samples of twins generalize to the broader population of non-twins. The current study analyzed data drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and findings suggested twins do not systematically differ from the general population of non-twins on many measures of behavior and development. Furthermore, the effects of specific covariates on measures of antisocial behavior did not appear to differ across twin status. In sum, evidence concerning the etiology of antisocial behavior (e.g., heritability estimates) gleaned from twin-based research is likely to generalize to the non-twin population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23274656      PMCID: PMC3683969          DOI: 10.1007/s10519-012-9580-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  24 in total

1.  Physical similarity and twin resemblance for eating attitudes and behaviors: a test of the equal environments assumption.

Authors:  K L Klump; A Holly; W G Iacono; M McGue; L E Willson
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  The personalities of twins: just ordinary folks.

Authors:  Wendy Johnson; Robert F Krueger; Thomas J Bouchard; Matt McGue
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2002-04

3.  Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Rhee; Irwin D Waldman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  Biosocial studies of antisocial and violent behavior in children and adults: a review.

Authors:  Adrian Raine
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2002-08

5.  Emotional and behavioral problems among female twins: an evaluation of the equal environments assumption.

Authors:  Nikole J Cronk; Wendy S Slutske; Pamela A F Madden; Kathleen K Bucholz; Wendy Reich; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Has the "Equal Environments" assumption been tested in twin studies?

Authors:  Lindon Eaves; Debra Foley; Judy Silberg
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2003-12

Review 7.  Annotation: growing up as a twin: twin-singleton differences in psychological development.

Authors:  M Rutter; J Redshaw
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  No evidence of a higher 10 year period prevalence of diabetes among 77,885 twins compared with 215,264 singletons from the Danish birth cohorts 1910-1989.

Authors:  I Petersen; M M F Nielsen; H Beck-Nielsen; K Christensen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Peer reports of adaptive behavior in twins and singletons: is twinship a risk or an advantage?

Authors:  Lea Pulkkinen; Inka Vaalamo; Risto Hietala; Jaakko Kaprio; Richard J Rose
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2003-04

10.  A twin-singleton comparison of problem behaviour in 2-3-year-olds.

Authors:  E J van den Oord; H M Koot; D I Boomsma; F C Verhulst; J F Orlebeke
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 8.982

View more
  29 in total

1.  Unstructured Socializing with Peers and Delinquent Behavior: A Genetically Informed Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan C Meldrum; J C Barnes
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2017-04-27

2.  Access to green space, physical activity and mental health: a twin study.

Authors:  Hannah Cohen-Cline; Eric Turkheimer; Glen E Duncan
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Differential genetic and environmental influences on developmental trajectories of antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood.

Authors:  Yao Zheng; H Harrington Cleveland
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2015-10-25

4.  Resilience and vulnerability in adolescents: genetic influences on differential response to risk for delinquency.

Authors:  Jamie Newsome; Christopher J Sullivan
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2014-03-02

5.  The impact of sleep duration on adolescent development: a genetically informed analysis of identical twin pairs.

Authors:  J C Barnes; Ryan C Meldrum
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2014-06-11

6.  Toward a Bioecological Model of School Engagement: A Biometric Analysis of Gene and Environmental Factors.

Authors:  Brandy R Maynard; Kevin M Beaver; Michael G Vaughn; Matthew DeLisi; Gregory Roberts
Journal:  Soc Work Res       Date:  2014-09-01

7.  Early Life Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Sleep: The Mediating Role of the Current Home Environment.

Authors:  Leah D Doane; Reagan S Breitenstein; Charles Beekman; Sierra Clifford; Trevor J Smith; Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2018-08-18

8.  Adolescents Who Self-Harm and Commit Violent Crime: Testing Early-Life Predictors of Dual Harm in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Leah S Richmond-Rakerd; Avshalom Caspi; Louise Arseneault; Jessie R Baldwin; Andrea Danese; Renate M Houts; Timothy Matthews; Jasmin Wertz; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Associations Between Mother-Child Relationship Quality and Adolescent Adjustment: Using a Genetically Controlled Design to Determine the Direction and Magnitude of Effects.

Authors:  Fanny-Alexandra Guimond; Brett Laursen; Frank Vitaro; Mara Brendgen; Ginette Dionne; Michel Boivin
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2016-02-07

10.  Telescoping and gender differences in the time course of disordered gambling: evidence from a general population sample.

Authors:  Wendy S Slutske; Thomas M Piasecki; Arielle R Deutsch; Dixie J Statham; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.