INTRODUCTION: Cigarette packaging is among the most prominent forms of tobacco marketing. This study examined the impact of cigarette pack design among young women in the United States. METHOD:A national sample of 18- to 19-year-old females in the United States completed an online survey in February 2010. Participants were randomized to view eight cigarette packs designed according to one of four experimental conditions: fully branded female packs, same packs without descriptors (e.g., "slims"), same packs without brand imagery or descriptors ("plain" packs), and branded non-female brands. Participants rated packs on measures of appeal and health risk and completed a behavioral pack selection task. RESULTS: Fully branded female packs were rated significantly more appealing than the same packs without descriptors, "plain" packs, and non-female-branded packs. Female-branded packs were associated with a greater number of positive attributes including glamour, slimness, and attractiveness and were more likely to be perceived as less harmful. Approximately 40% of smokers and nonsmokers requested a pack at the end of the study; female-branded packs were 3 times more likely to be selected than plain packs. CONCLUSION: Plain packaging and removing descriptors such as "slims" from cigarette packs may reduce smoking susceptibility among young women.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Cigarette packaging is among the most prominent forms of tobacco marketing. This study examined the impact of cigarette pack design among young women in the United States. METHOD: A national sample of 18- to 19-year-old females in the United States completed an online survey in February 2010. Participants were randomized to view eight cigarette packs designed according to one of four experimental conditions: fully branded female packs, same packs without descriptors (e.g., "slims"), same packs without brand imagery or descriptors ("plain" packs), and branded non-female brands. Participants rated packs on measures of appeal and health risk and completed a behavioral pack selection task. RESULTS: Fully branded female packs were rated significantly more appealing than the same packs without descriptors, "plain" packs, and non-female-branded packs. Female-branded packs were associated with a greater number of positive attributes including glamour, slimness, and attractiveness and were more likely to be perceived as less harmful. Approximately 40% of smokers and nonsmokers requested a pack at the end of the study; female-branded packs were 3 times more likely to be selected than plain packs. CONCLUSION: Plain packaging and removing descriptors such as "slims" from cigarette packs may reduce smoking susceptibility among young women.
Authors: M E Thompson; G T Fong; D Hammond; C Boudreau; P Driezen; A Hyland; R Borland; K M Cummings; G B Hastings; M Siahpush; A M Mackintosh; F L Laux Journal: Tob Control Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: R Borland; G T Fong; H-H Yong; K M Cummings; D Hammond; B King; M Siahpush; A McNeill; G Hastings; R J O'Connor; T Elton-Marshall; M P Zanna Journal: Tob Control Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Ron Borland; Michael K Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Addiction Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Bárbara Piñeiro; John B Correa; Vani N Simmons; Paul T Harrell; Nicole S Menzie; Marina Unrod; Lauren R Meltzer; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Dennis R Trinidad; Lyzette Blanco; Sherry L Emery; Pebbles Fagan; Martha M White; Mark B Reed Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2016-06-23
Authors: Micah L Berman; Greg Connolly; K Michael Cummings; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Jack E Henningfield; Matthew Myers; Richard J O'Connor; Mark Parascandola; Vaughan Rees; Jerry M Rice; Peter G Shields Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2015-04