Literature DB >> 25151661

Are young people's beliefs about menthol cigarettes associated with smoking-related intentions and behaviors?

Emily Brennan1, Laura Gibson2, Ani Momjian2, Robert C Hornik2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the beliefs that youth and young adults hold about menthol cigarettes or the influence of these beliefs on tobacco use initiation.
METHODS: Online cross-sectional surveys with 13- to 17-year-old current nonsmokers (n = 553) and 18- to 25-year-old never (n = 586) and current tobacco users (n = 307) in the United States assessed the association between endorsing each of 9 pro-menthol beliefs and (a) intentions to smoke menthol cigarettes over the next year, (b) current use of menthol cigarettes, (c) intentions to use tobacco in general over the next year, and (d) current use of tobacco products in general.
RESULTS: Menthols were perceived to be less harmful and addictive than nonmenthol cigarettes by between 13% and 23% of respondents. Between 20% and 58% believed that menthols had favorable sensory properties, and 7%-25% believed that menthol smokers were more popular and attractive than nonmenthol smokers. Logistic regression analyses (adjusting for confounders) indicated that, on the whole, those who endorsed pro-menthol beliefs were more likely to intend to use, and to currently use, both menthols and tobacco products in general. For example, respondents who believed that menthol cigarettes were more refreshing in sensation (one of the most frequently endorsed beliefs) were significantly more likely to (a) intend to smoke menthol cigarettes (13- to 17-year-olds, odds ratio [OR] = 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 4.34; 18- to 25-year olds, OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.04, 6.60), (b) currently use menthol cigarettes (18- to 25-year olds, OR = 3.40, 95% CI = 2.20, 5.26), (c) intend to use tobacco (13- to 17-year-olds OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.14, 2.65), and (d) currently use tobacco (18- to 25-year olds, OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.44, 2.93).
CONCLUSIONS: Youth and young adults who do not currently smoke and who hold favorable beliefs about menthol cigarettes are at greater risk for beginning to use tobacco products, indicating that the availability of menthol cigarettes may contribute to tobacco use initiation. These findings support recent claims that the elimination of menthol cigarettes would improve public health in the United States.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151661      PMCID: PMC4296170          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  22 in total

1.  The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  M Wakefield; C Morley; J K Horan; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The marketing of menthol cigarettes in the United States: populations, messages, and channels.

Authors:  Charyn D Sutton; Robert G Robinson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States.

Authors:  David Hammond; Juliana Doxey; Samantha Daniel; Maansi Bansal-Travers
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Small-group discussions on menthol cigarettes: listening to adult African American smokers in Atlanta, Georgia.

Authors:  Patricia Richter; Diane Beistle; Linda Pederson; Michelle O'Hegarty
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Tobacco industry control of menthol in cigarettes and targeting of adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kreslake; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Hillel R Alpert; Howard K Koh; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Does cigarette print advertising adhere to the Tobacco Institute's voluntary advertising and promotion code? An assessment.

Authors:  E M Barbeau; W DeJong; D M Brugge; W M Rand
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.222

7.  Initiation with menthol cigarettes and youth smoking uptake.

Authors:  James Nonnemaker; James Hersey; Ghada Homsi; Andrew Busey; Jane Allen; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions.

Authors:  Joshua Rising; Lori Alexander
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 9.  Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  Stacey J Anderson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.953

10.  The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey.

Authors:  Janne Scheffels; Ingeborg Lund
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  13 in total

1.  Flavors and Risk: Perceptions of Flavors in Little Cigars and Cigarillos Among U.S. Adults, 2015.

Authors:  Amy L Nyman; Kymberle L Sterling; Ban A Majeed; Dina M Jones; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Smokers' support for tobacco endgame measures in Canada: findings from the 2016 International Tobacco Control Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Authors:  Janet Chung-Hall; Geoffrey T Fong; Pete Driezen; Lorraine Craig
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-09-28

3.  Association between menthol-flavoured cigarette smoking and flavoured little cigar and cigarillo use among African-American, Hispanic, and white young and middle-aged adult smokers.

Authors:  K Sterling; C Fryer; I Pagano; D Jones; P Fagan
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Believability of Cigarette Warnings About Addiction: National Experiments of Adolescents and Adults.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard; Sarah D Kowitt; Li-Ling Huang; Seth M Noar; Kristen L Jarman; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Association between use of flavoured tobacco products and quit behaviours: findings from a cross-sectional survey of US adult tobacco users.

Authors:  Danielle M Smith; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jidong Huang; Dianne Barker; Andrew J Hyland; Frank Chaloupka
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  In Their Own Words: Young Adults' Menthol Cigarette Initiation, Perceptions, Experiences and Regulation Perspectives.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Kiameesha R Evans; Melissa B Harrell; Alexandra Loukas; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Appeal and Impact of Characterizing Flavors on Young Adult Small Cigar Use.

Authors:  Kymberle L Sterling; Craig S Fryer; Meghan Nix; Pebbles Fagan
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2015-03-01

8.  To vape or not to vape? Effects of exposure to conflicting news headlines on beliefs about harms and benefits of electronic cigarette use: Results from a randomized controlled experiment.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Chul-Joo Lee; Rebekah H Nagler; Cabral A Bigman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 9.  Menthol cigarettes and the public health standard: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Lauren K Collins; Raymond S Niaura; Stacey Y Gagosian; David B Abrams
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Australian Smokers' Sensory Experiences and Beliefs Associated with Menthol and Non-Menthol Cigarettes.

Authors:  Serafino Mancuso; Emily Brennan; Kimberley Dunstone; Amanda Vittiglia; Sarah Durkin; James F Thrasher; Janet Hoek; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.