Literature DB >> 21482703

To test or not to test? The role of attitudes, knowledge, and religious involvement among U.S. adults on intent-to-obtain adult genetic testing.

Anda Botoseneanu1, Jeffrey A Alexander, Jane Banaszak-Holl.   

Abstract

Genetic testing can advance cancer prevention if current screening behaviors improve. Increased prevalence of high-risk genotypes within specific religious groups, use of religious venues for recruiting to genetic screening, and ethical-religious considerations argue for exploring the role of religiosity in forming genetic testing decisions. This study uses the theory of reasoned action and structural equation modeling to test the effects of religious involvement, attitudes, knowledge, and previous experience on intent-to-obtain genetic testing within a representative sample of 1,824 U.S. adults. A majority of respondents indicate willingness to test, especially for curable disorders. Attitudes, knowledge, and previous experience have significant direct effects, and religious involvement has an indirect effect, through its negative effect on attitudes, on intent-to-test. High religious involvement is associated with more negative attitudes toward genetic testing. The findings underscore the need to refine genetic testing outreach efforts to account for multiple influences on consumer intent-to-test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482703     DOI: 10.1177/1090198110389711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  18 in total

1.  Measuring genetic knowledge: a brief survey instrument for adolescents and adults.

Authors:  S M Fitzgerald-Butt; A Bodine; K M Fry; J Ash; A N Zaidi; V Garg; C A Gerhardt; K L McBride
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Bumps along the translational pathway: anticipating uptake of tailored smoking cessation treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Elizabeth Shields; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Anna Boonin Schachter
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  The measurement of patient attitudes regarding prenatal and preconception genetic carrier screening and translational behavioral medicine: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jennifer J Shiroff; Mathew J Gregoski
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Ethnicity, educational level and attitudes contribute to parental intentions about genetic testing for child obesity.

Authors:  Paul L Kocken; Meinou H C Theunissen; Yvonne Schönbeck; Lidewij Henneman; A Cecile J W Janssens; Symone B Detmar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-02-07

6.  Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.

Authors:  Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Jonathan S Berg; Kyle Brothers; Ellen W Clayton; Wendy Chung; Barbara J Evans; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Carlos J Gallego; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Stacy W Gray; Ingrid A Holm; Iftikhar J Kullo; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Cathy McCarty; Cynthia A Prows; Heidi L Rehm; Richard R Sharp; Joseph Salama; Saskia Sanderson; Sara L Van Driest; Marc S Williams; Susan M Wolf; Wendy A Wolf; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel S Dodson; Aaron J Goldenberg; Matthew M Davis; Dianne C Singer; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Online discussion effects on intention to participate in genetic research: A longitudinal experimental study.

Authors:  Sojung Claire Kim; Joseph N Cappella; Vincent Price
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2016-04-06

9.  Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The role of religious and existential well-being in families with Lynch syndrome: prevention, family communication, and psychosocial adjustment.

Authors:  Bronwyn A Morris; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.