BACKGROUND: Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus administered to four insulinoma patients rapidly controlled hypoglycemia (Kulke et al., N Engl J Med 2009;360:195-197). We wanted to identify the kinetics of everolimus effects on controlling hypoglycemia and understand underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Three consecutive patients with a metastasized symptomatic insulinoma were started on 100 μg of octreotide subcutaneously three times daily. Because of persisting hypoglycemias, treatment with daily 10 mg of oral everolimus was initiated. Serial plasma glucose levels and serum insulin levels were measured. Computer tomography (CT) scans were performed before and after 2 and 5 months of treatment. [¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) scans, to visualize glucose metabolism, were made before and after 2 weeks, 5 weeks, and 5 months of treatment. The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was quantified as the maximum standardized uptake value. RESULTS: All patients achieved control of hypoglycemia on everolimus within 14 days. Insulin levels were 2.5- to 6.3-fold elevated before start of treatment and declined 14%-64% after 4 weeks of treatment. CT scans showed stable disease at 2 months in all patients, with progressive disease after 5 months in one. Before treatment, both the tumor lesions and the muscles and myocardium showed high ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. Everolimus reduced tumor and muscle ¹⁸F-FDG uptake after 2 weeks by 26% ± 14% and 19% ± 41%, and after 5 months by 31% ± 13% and 27% ± 41%. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus normalizes plasma glucose levels in metastatic insulinoma within 14 days, coinciding with a lower glucose uptake in tumor and muscles and declining (pro)insulin levels. This effect on tumor as well as normal tissues explains the rapid controlling of hypoglycemia.
BACKGROUND:Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus administered to four insulinomapatients rapidly controlled hypoglycemia (Kulke et al., N Engl J Med 2009;360:195-197). We wanted to identify the kinetics of everolimus effects on controlling hypoglycemia and understand underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Three consecutive patients with a metastasized symptomatic insulinoma were started on 100 μg of octreotide subcutaneously three times daily. Because of persisting hypoglycemias, treatment with daily 10 mg of oral everolimus was initiated. Serial plasma glucose levels and serum insulin levels were measured. Computer tomography (CT) scans were performed before and after 2 and 5 months of treatment. [¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) scans, to visualize glucose metabolism, were made before and after 2 weeks, 5 weeks, and 5 months of treatment. The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was quantified as the maximum standardized uptake value. RESULTS: All patients achieved control of hypoglycemia on everolimus within 14 days. Insulin levels were 2.5- to 6.3-fold elevated before start of treatment and declined 14%-64% after 4 weeks of treatment. CT scans showed stable disease at 2 months in all patients, with progressive disease after 5 months in one. Before treatment, both the tumor lesions and the muscles and myocardium showed high ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. Everolimus reduced tumor and muscle ¹⁸F-FDG uptake after 2 weeks by 26% ± 14% and 19% ± 41%, and after 5 months by 31% ± 13% and 27% ± 41%. CONCLUSIONS:Everolimus normalizes plasma glucose levels in metastatic insulinoma within 14 days, coinciding with a lower glucose uptake in tumor and muscles and declining (pro)insulin levels. This effect on tumor as well as normal tissues explains the rapid controlling of hypoglycemia.
Authors: Motoo Araki; Stuart M Flechner; Hazem R Ismail; Lawrence M Flechner; Lingmei Zhou; Ithaar H Derweesh; David Goldfarb; Charles Modlin; Andrew C Novick; Charles Faiman Journal: Transplantation Date: 2006-02-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Salvatore Di Paolo; Annalisa Teutonico; Domenica Leogrande; Carmen Capobianco; Paolo F Schena Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2006-06-28 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Dik J Kwekkeboom; Wouter W de Herder; Boen L Kam; Casper H van Eijck; Martijn van Essen; Peter P Kooij; Richard A Feelders; Maarten O van Aken; Eric P Krenning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Neal J Meropol; James Posey; David P Ryan; Joel Picus; Emily Bergsland; Keith Stuart; Lesley Tye; Xin Huang; Jim Z Li; Charles M Baum; Charles S Fuchs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Bernard Escudier; Stéphane Oudard; Thomas E Hutson; Camillo Porta; Sergio Bracarda; Viktor Grünwald; John A Thompson; Robert A Figlin; Norbert Hollaender; Gladys Urbanowitz; William J Berg; Andrea Kay; David Lebwohl; Alain Ravaud Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James C Yao; Alexandria T Phan; David Z Chang; Robert A Wolff; Kenneth Hess; Sanjay Gupta; Carmen Jacobs; Jeannette E Mares; Andrea N Landgraf; Asif Rashid; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Antonio Pinto; Annika Jahn; Moritz Benjamin Immohr; Alexander Jenke; Laura Döhrn; Markus Kornfeld; Artur Lichtenberg; Payam Akhyari; Udo Boeken Journal: Inflammation Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.092