Literature DB >> 18653228

Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

Robert J Motzer1, Bernard Escudier, Stéphane Oudard, Thomas E Hutson, Camillo Porta, Sergio Bracarda, Viktor Grünwald, John A Thompson, Robert A Figlin, Norbert Hollaender, Gladys Urbanowitz, William J Berg, Andrea Kay, David Lebwohl, Alain Ravaud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Everolimus (RAD001) is an orally administered inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a therapeutic target for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We did a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma whose disease had progressed on vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy.
METHODS: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma which had progressed on sunitinib, sorafenib, or both, were randomly assigned in a two to one ratio to receive everolimus 10 mg once daily (n=272) or placebo (n=138), in conjunction with best supportive care. Randomisation was done centrally via an interactive voice response system using a validated computer system, and was stratified by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic score and previous anticancer therapy, with a permuted block size of six. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed via a blinded, independent central review. The study was designed to be terminated after 290 events of progression. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00410124.
FINDINGS: All randomised patients were included in efficacy analyses. The results of the second interim analysis indicated a significant difference in efficacy between arms and the trial was thus halted early after 191 progression events had been observed (101 [37%] events in the everolimus group, 90 [65%] in the placebo group; hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.22-0.40, p<0.0001; median progression-free survival 4.0 [95% CI 3.7-5.5] vs 1.9 [1.8-1.9] months). Stomatitis (107 [40%] patients in the everolimus group vs 11 [8%] in the placebo group), rash (66 [25%] vs six [4%]), and fatigue (53 [20%] vs 22 [16%]) were the most commonly reported adverse events, but were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Pneumonitis (any grade) was detected in 22 (8%) patients in the everolimus group, of whom eight had pneumonitis of grade 3 severity.
INTERPRETATION: Treatment with everolimus prolongs progression-free survival relative to placebo in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma that had progressed on other targeted therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18653228     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  1057 in total

Review 1.  Immunologic mechanisms in RCC and allogeneic renal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Maxine Sun; Giovanni Lughezzani; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Combination testing (Stage 2) of the Anti-IGF-1 receptor antibody IMC-A12 with rapamycin by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; John M Maris; Stephen T Keir; Christopher L Morton; Jianrong Wu; Amy W Wozniak; Malcolm A Smith; Peter J Houghton
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  A phase I study of temozolomide and everolimus (RAD001) in patients with newly diagnosed and progressive glioblastoma either receiving or not receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants: an NCIC CTG study.

Authors:  Warren P Mason; Mary Macneil; Petr Kavan; Jacob Easaw; David Macdonald; Brian Thiessen; Shweta Urva; Zarnie Lwin; Lynn McIntosh; Elizabeth Eisenhauer
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Evaluation of treatment response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: role of state-of-the-art cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Venkata S Katabathina; Nathalie Lassau; Ivan Pedrosa; Chaan S Ng; Srinivasa R Prasad
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Pulmonary toxicities from targeted therapies: a review.

Authors:  Nicholas A Barber; Apar Kishor Ganti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 7.  Rapamycin-resistant effector T-cell therapy.

Authors:  Daniel H Fowler
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

8.  Clinical outcomes and survival of advanced renal cancer patients in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Laeeq Malik; Helen Parsons; Devalingam Mahalingam; Benjamin Ehler; Martin Goros; Alex Mejia; Andrew Brenner; John Sarantopoulos
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  mTOR inhibitors block Kaposi sarcoma growth by inhibiting essential autocrine growth factors and tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Debasmita Roy; Sang-Hoon Sin; Amy Lucas; Raman Venkataramanan; Ling Wang; Anthony Eason; Veenadhari Chavakula; Isaac B Hilton; Kristen M Tamburro; Blossom Damania; Dirk P Dittmer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Metastatic Renal Cancer: What Role for Everolimus?

Authors:  Franck A Belibi; Charles L Edelstein
Journal:  Clin Med Rev Oncol       Date:  2010-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.