Literature DB >> 21480432

Association of psychosocial risk screening in pediatric cancer with psychosocial services provided.

Anne E Kazak1, Lamia P Barakat, Wei-Ting Hwang, Susan Ditaranto, Daniel Biros, David Beele, Leslie Kersun, Matthew C Hocking, Anne Reilly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: How screening for psychosocial risk in pediatric oncology may relate to the number and type of psychosocial services provided is a critical step in linking screening with treatment. We predicted that screening at diagnosis would be associated with the delivery of more psychosocial services over 8 weeks and that these services would be consistent with Universal, Targeted, or Clinical psychosocial risk level based on the Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM).
METHODS: Parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer received either the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT; n = 49) or psychosocial care as usual (PAU; n = 47), based on their date of diagnosis and an alternating monthly schedule. Medical record review and surveys completed by social workers and child life specialists were used to determine psychosocial services provided to patients and their families over the first eight weeks of treatment.
RESULTS: As predicted, families in the PAT condition received more services than those in PAU based on social worker and child life specialist report and medical record review. Within the PAT group, families at the Targeted and Clinical levels of risk received more intensive services than those at the Universal level.
CONCLUSIONS: This initial report shows how psychosocial risk screening may impact psychosocial care in pediatric cancer, supporting the importance of screening as well as matching services to risk level.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480432     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  10 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: psychosocial characteristics and considerations.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Haven Battles; Sima Zadeh; Carly J Smith; Lee J Helman; Su Young Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Parent perspectives on family-based psychosocial interventions in pediatric cancer: a mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Matthew C Hocking; Anne E Kazak; Stephanie Schneider; Darlene Barkman; Lamia P Barakat; Janet A Deatrick
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The association of psychosocial screening and service provision in pediatric oncology: the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0) into clinical practice.

Authors:  M C McCarthy; S DeGraves; C E Wakefield; M J Bowden; L V Marks; L K Williams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Screening for cognitive deficits in 8 to 14-year old children with cerebellar tumors using self-report measures of executive and behavioral functioning and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Kim S Bull; Christina Liossi; Janet L Peacock; Ho Ming Yuen; Colin R Kennedy
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Screening for psychosocial risk in pediatric cancer.

Authors:  Anne E Kazak; Moriah Brier; Melissa A Alderfer; Anne Reilly; Stephanie Fooks Parker; Stephanie Rogerwick; Susan Ditaranto; Lamia P Barakat
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care.

Authors:  Sasja A Schepers; Simone M Sint Nicolaas; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Elisabeth M van Dijk-Lokkart; Esther M M van den Bergh; Nienke de Boer; Chris M Verhaak; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Implementation of family psychosocial risk assessment in pediatric cancer with the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT): study protocol for a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Anne E Kazak; Janet A Deatrick; Michele A Scialla; Eric Sandler; Rebecca E Madden; Lamia P Barakat
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Pediatric Medical Traumatic Stress (PMTS) following Surgery in Childhood and Adolescence: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Stanzel; Susan Sierau
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2021-08-21

9.  Families following pediatric traumatic medical events: identifying psychosocial risk profiles using latent profile analysis.

Authors:  Yaara Sadeh; Rachel Dekel; Amichai Brezner; Jana Landa; Tamar Silberg
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2022-09-21

10.  Using qualitative and participatory methods to refine implementation strategies: universal family psychosocial screening in pediatric cancer.

Authors:  Janet A Deatrick; Anne E Kazak; Rebecca E Madden; Glynnis A McDonnell; Katherine Okonak; Michele A Scialla; Lamia P Barakat
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-06-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.