Literature DB >> 26474768

Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of cost-effectiveness: analysis of 111 procedures.

Murat Bagcioglu1, Aslan Demir2, Hasan Sulhan3, Mert Ali Karadag2, Mehmet Uslu2, Umit Yener Tekdogan2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to audit the costs of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) and compare them in terms of cost-effectiveness. We performed a retrospective analysis of 63 patients who underwent microperc and 48 patients who underwent RIRS. The cases, performed between first use and first repair, were used for this initial study. The costs associated with performing RIRS and microperc, including the costs of devices, disposables, hospitalization, and additional required treatments, were audited. The main perioperative and postoperative parameters were collected, including operation time, JJ stent requirements, used disposables, stone-free rates, and complications. Statistical analyses of the means of continuous variables were performed using Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-squared tests. The mean cost of RIRS was $917.13 ± 73.62 and the mean cost of microperc was $831.58 ± 79.51; this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean operation time of the RIRS group was significantly shorter than the microperc group (55.62 ± 19.62 min and 98.50 ± 29.64 min, respectively, p < 0.001). The assessment of required additional treatment showed that it was significantly higher in the RIRS group than the microperc group (p = 0.02). The stone-free rate for RIRS was 66.6 and 80.9 % for microperc; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.12). In our series, the use of microperc is less expensive than RIRS due to additional required treatments and ancillary equipment in RIRS. RIRS is more effective than microperc in terms of operation time and more effective use of operation rooms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; Endourology; Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Stone treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26474768     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0828-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  16 in total

1.  Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis.

Authors:  W E GOODWIN; W C CASEY; W WOOLF
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1955-03-12

2.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

Review 3.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Contemporary surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Standard, mini, ultra-mini, and micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is next? A novel labeling system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to the size of the access sheath used during procedure.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  The role of microperc in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Abdullah Armagan; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Necmettin Penbegul; Tolga Akman; Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Cevper Ersoz; Mehmet Remzi Erdem; Muzaffer Akcay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective comparative analysis of 124 patients.

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Aslan Demir; Kursat Cecen; Murat Bagcioglu; Ramazan Kocaaslan; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.510

8.  Initial experience of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal calculi in 140 renal units.

Authors:  Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Gokhan Atis; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Mansur Daggulli; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Tuna Karatag; Cenk Gurbuz; Abdullah Armagan; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; John Denstedt; Petrisor Geavlete; Francis Keeley; Tadashi Matsuda; Margaret Pearle; Glenn Preminger; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  The cost analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 302 cases.

Authors:  Cenk Gurbuz; Gokhan Atış; Ozgur Arikan; Ozgur Efilioglu; Asıf Yıldırım; Onur Danacıoglu; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  6 in total

1.  Calculating the cost of reusable materials in endourological stone surgeries.

Authors:  Haluk Soylemez; Tahsin Batuhan Aydogan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Clinical effects of FURL and PCNL with holmium laser for the treatment of kidney stones.

Authors:  Zhi-Gang Li; Yan Zhao; Tao Fan; Lin Hao; Cong-Hui Han; Guang-Hui Zang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Role of Minimally Invasive (Micro and Ultra-mini) PCNL for Adult Urinary Stone Disease in the Modern Era: Evidence from a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick Jones; Muhammad Elmussareh; Omar M Aboumarzouk; Phillip Mucksavage; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Evaluation of Performance Parameters of the Disposable Flexible Ureterorenoscope (LITHOVUE) in Patients with Renal Stones: A Prospective, Observational, Single-arm, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Sung Yong Cho; Joo Yong Lee; Dong Gil Shin; Ill Young Seo; Sangjun Yoo; Hyung Keun Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi of ≤2 cm: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Binbin Jiao; Shicong Lai; Xin Xu; Meng Zhang; Tongxiang Diao; Guan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jiuzhi Li; Wei Zhu; Xiaolu Duan; Zhijian Zhao; Tuo Deng; Haifeng Duan; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.