| Literature DB >> 21477322 |
Abstract
The field of primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) is one of several in the area of clinical immunology that has not been static, but rather has shown exponential growth due to enhanced physician, scientist and patient education and awareness, leading to identification of new diseases, new molecular diagnoses of existing clinical phenotypes, broadening of the spectrum of clinical and phenotypic presentations associated with a single or related gene defects, increased bioinformatics resources, and utilization of advanced diagnostic technology and methodology for disease diagnosis and management resulting in improved outcomes and survival. There are currently over 200 PIDs with at least 170 associated genetic defects identified, with several of these being reported in recent years. The enormous clinical and immunological heterogeneity in the PIDs makes diagnosis challenging, but there is no doubt that early and accurate diagnosis facilitates prompt intervention leading to decreased morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis of PIDs often requires correlation of data obtained from clinical and radiological findings with laboratory immunological analyses and genetic testing. The field of laboratory diagnostic immunology is also rapidly burgeoning, both in terms of novel technologies and applications, and knowledge of human immunology. Over the years, the classification of PIDs has been primarily based on the immunological defect(s) ("immunophenotype") with the relatively recent addition of genotype, though there are clinical classifications as well. There can be substantial overlap in terms of the broad immunophenotype and clinical features between PIDs, and therefore, it is relevant to refine, at a cellular and molecular level, unique immunological defects that allow for a specific and accurate diagnosis. The diagnostic testing armamentarium for PID includes flow cytometry - phenotyping and functional, cellular and molecular assays, protein analysis, and mutation identification by gene sequencing. The complexity and diversity of the laboratory diagnosis of PIDs necessitates many of the above-mentioned tests being performed in highly specialized reference laboratories. Despite these restrictions, there remains an urgent need for improved standardization and optimization of phenotypic and functional flow cytometry and protein-specific assays. A key component in the interpretation of immunological assays is the comparison of patient data to that obtained in a statistically-robust manner from age and gender-matched healthy donors. This review highlights a few of the laboratory assays available for the diagnostic work-up of broad categories of PIDs, based on immunophenotyping, followed by examples of disease-specific testing.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21477322 PMCID: PMC3080807 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7961-9-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Mol Allergy ISSN: 1476-7961
List of only those PIDs where screening diagnosis can be made by specific protein detection by flow cytometry
| PID | Disease-specific protein detected by flow* |
|---|---|
| X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) | Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) in monocytes, platelets |
| Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) and related allelic variants, X-linked thrombocytopenia (XLT) and X-linked neutropenia/myelodysplasia | Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome protein (WASP) |
| X-linked Hyper IgM syndrome (XL-HIGM) | CD40L (CD154) on activated T cells |
| Hyper IgM syndrome type 3 | CD40 on B cells and/or monocytes |
| CVID-associated defects | ICOS (activated T cells), CD19, BAFF-R, TACI |
| Familial Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (fHLH) | Perforin in NK cells and CD8 T cells |
| X-linked lymphoproliferative disease (XLP) | SAP (SH2D1A) |
| X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XLP2) disease | XIAP (BIRC4) |
| Chronic Granulomatous disease (CGD) - Autosomal recessive | p47phox, p67phox, p22phox in neutrophils |
| Leukocyte Adhesion deficiency type 1 (LAD-1) | CD18, CD11a, CD11b on leukocytes |
| Leukocyte Adhesion deficiency type 2 (LAD-2) | CD15 (Sialyl-Lewis X) on neutrophils and monocytes |
| Interferon gamma receptor 1 deficiency | IFNγR1 |
| Interferon gamma receptor 2 deficiency | IFNγR2 |
| IL-12 and IL-23 receptor β1 deficiency | IL-12Rβ1 |
| STAT1 deficiency | pSTAT1 |
| STAT5B deficiency | pSTAT5 |
| Immunodeficiency, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) | FOXP3 on regulatory T cells (Tregs, CD4+CD25+FOXP3+) |
| Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, and myelokathexis (WHIM) | CXCR4 on T cells |
| Common gamma chain (cγ chain) | CD132 (IL-2RG, IL-4RG, IL-7RG, IL-9RG, IL-15RG) on activated T cells |
| Bare Lymphocyte Syndrome type I and II (BLS I and II) | MHC class I and II expression on monocytes, B cells and T cells (activated) respectively |
| CD25 deficiency (IPEX-like syndrome) | CD25 (IL2Rα) |
| Membrane cofactor protein (MCP) deficiency | CD46 |
| Membrane attack complex deficiency (MAC) | CD59 |
* Presence of protein as detected by flow cytometry does not rule out an underlying functional mutation, therefore, results have to be correlated with other laboratory and immunological parameters, including functional flow cytometry when applicable, clinical and family history and confirmed by genetic testing for final diagnosis. Details of these individual defects can be found in "Immunologic Disorders in Infants and Children, 5th Ed, Eds. R. Stiehm, H. Ochs and J. Winkelstein, 2005, Elsevier Saunders).
Figure 1Evaluation for X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA). A) Flow cytometric evaluation for Btk protein in a healthy control. B) Flow cytometric evaluation for Btk protein in Case 1 patient. C) Full-gene sequencing in the BTK gene for mutation analysis in Case 1 patient. D) Schematic representation of Btk protein structural organization. E) Schematic representation of Btk in B cell development.
Normal reference values for lymphocyte subsets in healthy adults determined by flow cytometry
| Lymphocyte subset | 95% reference values | |
|---|---|---|
| CD45 | 0.99 - 3.15 thousand/uL | 1.00 - 3.33 thousand/uL |
| CD3 | 677-2383 cells/μl | 617-2254 cells/μl |
| CD4 | 424-1509 cells/μl | 430-1513 cells/μl |
| CD8 | 169-955 cells/μl | 101-839 cells/μl |
| CD19 | 99-527 cells/μl | 31-409 cells/μl |
| CD16+56+ | 101-678 cells/μl | 110-657 cells/μl |
| CD3 | 59-83% | 49-87% |
| CD4 | 31-59% | 32-67% |
| CD8 | 12-38% | 8-40% |
| CD19 | 6-22% | 3-20% |
| CD16+56+ | 6-27% | 6-35% |
Data derived from 207 healthy adult male and female donors. Pediatric reference ranges for T, B and NK cells [147].
Figure 2Evaluation for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) and related allelic variant, X-linked thrombocytopenia (XLT). A) Pedigree analysis for patient (Case 2) with X-linked thrombocytopenia (XLT). B) Flow cytometric analysis for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) in lymphocytes in XLT patient and carrier. Figure reproduced with permission of American Society of Hematology, from "X-linked thrombocytopenia identified by flow cytometric demonstration of defective Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein in lymphocytes", Kanegane et al, 95: 1110-1111, 2000; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc [38]. C) Flow cytometric analysis for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) in lymphocytes in WAS patient. Figure reprinted from Journal of Immunological Methods, 260, Kawai et al., Flow cytometric determination of intracytoplasmic Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein in peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations, p.195-205 [21], Copyright (2000), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3Evaluation for Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD). A) Flow cytometric analysis for neutrophil oxidative burst (NOXB) in a healthy control. B) Flow cytometric analysis for neutrophil oxidative burst (NOXB) in a patient with X-linked Chronic Granulomatous Disease (XL-CGD), Case #3. C) Full-gene sequencing in the CYBB gene for mutation analysis in Case 3 patient. D) Flow cytometric analysis for neutrophil oxidative burst (NOXB) in mother of patient with X-linked Chronic Granulomatous Disease (XL-CGD), Case #3. E) Schematic representation of NADPH oxidase. F) Flow cytometric analysis for neutrophil oxidative burst (NOXB) in a carrier with X-linked Chronic Granulomatous Disease (XL-CGD), Case #4. G) Flow cytometric analysis for neutrophil oxidative burst (NOXB) in a patient with autosomal recessive CGD (AR-CGD). H) Flow cytometric analysis for neutrophil oxidative burst (NOXB) in a carrier with autosomal recessive CGD (AR-CGD).
Non-disease-specific immunological tests used for the diagnosis of PIDs
| Immunological Tests | Method(s) |
|---|---|
| Complete blood count (CBC) with differential | Automated hematology analyzer |
| Immunoglobulin quantitation - IgG, IgA, IgM, IgD, IgE | Immunoassay methods* |
| IgG, IgA subclass quantitation | Immunoassays |
| Lymphocyte subset quantitation - T, B and NK cells | Flow cytometry (FC) |
| B cell subset immunophenotyping (naïve B cells, memory B cell subsets, transitional B cells, plasmablasts, CD21low B cells) | FC |
| T cell subset immunophenotyping (T cell subsets - naïve, activated and memory, Th17 T cells, regulatory T cells) | FC |
| NK cell subset immunophenotyping (Cytotoxic and cytokine-producing NK cells, NKT cells, measurement of perforin, granzyme A, granzyme B, IFN-gamma, CD107a/CD107b for functional proteins) | FC |
| Complement pathways (classical, alternate, mannose-binding lectin) | Immunoassays, Hemolytic assays |
| Cytokines | In plasma or tissue culture, after T cell stimulation (multiplex methods - Luminex® or flow cytometry), in cells by intracellular flow cytometry, ELISPOT |
| Soluble activation or inflammatory markers - e.g. soluble BAFF, soluble CD25 (IL-2R) | Immunoassays or multiplex flow cytometry |
| Antibody responses to vaccine antigens Diphtheria, tetanus, Pneumococcal, | Serological methods, multiplex methods (e.g. Luminex®) |
| Lymphocyte proliferation (mitogens, antigens, anti-CD3 stimulation) | Thymidine (3H-t) method, FC (CFSE, Edu®) |
| Thymopoiesis (TREC, CD4/CD8 recent thymic emigrants) | Real-time PCR, FC |
| TCR receptor diversity | Spectratyping -molecular, FC |
| NK cytotoxicity (spontaneous killing, ADCC, IL-2-stimulated and PHA stimulated cytotoxicity) | Radioactive method, FC |
| CD8 T cell cytotoxicity - mitogen-stimulated, antigen-specific | Radioactive method, FC |
| Costimulatory molecules | FC |
| TLR signaling pathways and phosphorylated proteins | FC, specific cytokines after TLR stimulation, Immunoblot analysis |
| Mutation analysis for monogenic defects of immune components | DNA-based gene sequencing |
| Measurement of innate immune responses | FC |
| Chromosomal studies for chromosomal defects - deletion, translocations and rearrangements | Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) |
| Antigen-specific T cell quantitation | Tetramers/Pentamers/Dextramers® by FC |
| Adenosine deaminase (ADA), Purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), Gluocse-6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), Myeloperoxidase (MPO) | Enzyme assays |
| Adhesion molecules for Leukocyte Adhesion deficiencies (CD18, CD11a, CD11b, CD15) | FC |
| Neutrophil oxidative burst^ | DHR test by FC (Nitroblue tetrazolium -NBT- test can also be used) |
| Delayed type Hypersensitivity | |
| Autoantibodies (for PID-associated autoimmunity or autoantibody-related cytopenias) | Direct antiglobulin test (DAT or Coombs' test) for autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Immunoassays |
*For a detailed list of immunoassay methods (see Table 3, page 11, Chapter 3 - Protein Analysis for Diagnostic Applications, by AT Remaley and GL Hortin, In Molecular Clinical Laboratory Immunology, Eds, Detrick, Hamilton and Folds, 7th Ed), ^ Neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytic cells have limited clinical utility, DHR - Dihydrorhodamine 1,2,3; a bone marrow biopsy can be performed for further evaluation of certain PIDs, e.g. abnormal retention of neutrophils in the marrow (myelokathexis in WHIM syndrome), aberrant production of hematopoietic precursors (Reticular dysgenesis and congenital neutropenias).