Literature DB >> 21476936

Randomized trial on the influence of the length of two insulin pen needles on glycemic control and patient preference in obese patients with diabetes.

Gillian Kreugel1, Joost C Keers, Michiel N Kerstens, Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the influence of needle length for insulin administration on metabolic control and patient preference in obese patients with diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label crossover study, insulin pen needles of two different lengths (5 mm and 8 mm) were compared. A total of 130 insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) were randomized, and 126 patients completed the study. Patients started using the 5-mm needle for 3 months, after which they switched to injecting insulin with the 8-mm needle for another 3 months, or vice versa. Hemoglobin A1c (A1C), fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol were measured, and self-reported side effects and patient preference were recorded.
RESULTS: No within-group changes were observed with respect to A1C, serum fructosamine, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, hypoglycemic events, bruising, and pain. When data of all 126 subjects were pooled, there was a small, but significant, difference between needle lengths (5-mm, A1C 7.47 ± 0.9%; 8-mm, 7.59 ± 1.0%; P = 0.02). Patients reported less bleeding with the 5-mm needle (P = 0.04) and less insulin leakage from the skin with the 8-mm needle (P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in patient preference, with 46% of the patients preferring the 5-mm needle, 41% the 8-mm needle, and 13% not preferring a particular needle length.
CONCLUSIONS: A 5-mm needle is similar to an 8-mm needle in obese patients with diabetes with respect to metabolic control, injection-related complaints, or patient preference and can be used safely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476936      PMCID: PMC3118929          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2011.0010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  16 in total

1.  Results and analysis of the 2008-2009 Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Carina De Coninck; Anders Frid; Ruth Gaspar; Debbie Hicks; Larry Hirsch; Gillian Kreugel; Jutta Liersch; Corinne Letondeur; Jean-Pierre Sauvanet; Nadia Tubiana; Kenneth Strauss
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.006

2.  A new injection technique for insulin treatment, simpler to use and as effective?

Authors:  L Engström; A Bergman
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  1993

3.  Comparative glycemic control, safety and patient ratings for a new 4 mm x 32G insulin pen needle in adults with diabetes.

Authors:  Laurence J Hirsch; Michael A Gibney; John Albanese; Shankang Qu; Kenneth Kassler-Taub; Leslie J Klaff; Timothy S Bailey
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 4.  New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  A Frid; L Hirsch; R Gaspar; D Hicks; G Kreugel; J Liersch; C Letondeur; J P Sauvanet; N Tubiana-Rufi; K Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.041

5.  Pain following controlled cutaneous insertion of needles with different diameters.

Authors:  Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Henrik Egekvist; Peter Bjerring
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2006 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Effects of the anatomical region used for insulin injections on glycemia in type I diabetes subjects.

Authors:  J P Bantle; L Neal; L M Frankamp
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Comparison of patient's preference, pain perception, and usability between Micro Fine Plus 31-gauge needle and Microtapered NanoPass 33-gauge needle for insulin therapy.

Authors:  Masashi Miyakoshi; Kyuzi Kamoi; Midori Iwanaga; Ayako Hoshiyama; Ayako Yamada
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09

8.  Patient perceptions of injection pain and anxiety: a comparison of NovoFine 32-gauge tip 6mm and Micro Fine Plus 31-gauge 5mm needles.

Authors:  Midori Iwanaga; Kyuzi Kamoi
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  A comparison of insulin injection needles on patients' perceptions of pain, handling, and acceptability: a randomized, open-label, crossover study in subjects with diabetes.

Authors:  Maureen McKay; Gerhard Compion; Lene Lytzen
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Echographic measurement of skin thickness in adults by high frequency ultrasound to assess the appropriate microneedle length for intradermal delivery of vaccines.

Authors:  Aurélie Laurent; Frédéric Mistretta; David Bottigioli; Karima Dahel; Catherine Goujon; Jean François Nicolas; Anca Hennino; Philippe E Laurent
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The role of comfort and discomfort in insulin therapy.

Authors:  Ronnie Aronson
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Impact of a modified needle tip geometry on penetration force as well as acceptability, preference, and perceived pain in subjects with diabetes.

Authors:  Laurence Hirsch; Michael Gibney; Julie Berube; John Manocchio
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 3.  Use of technology when assessing adherence to diabetes self-management behaviors.

Authors:  Kimberly A Driscoll; Deborah Young-Hyman
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Skin blood perfusion and cellular response to insertion of insulin pen needles with different diameters.

Authors:  Kezia Ann Præstmark; Casper Bo Jensen; Bente Stallknecht; Nils Berg Madsen; Jonas Kildegaard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-17

5.  Subcutaneous Injection Depth Does Not Affect the Pharmacokinetics or Glucodynamics of Insulin Lispro in Normal Weight or Healthy Obese Subjects.

Authors:  Amparo de la Peña; Kwee P Yeo; Helle Linnebjerg; Edward Catton; Shobha Reddy; Patricia Brown-Augsburger; Linda Morrow; Debra A Ignaut
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-19

6.  Injection Technique and Pen Needle Design Affect Leakage From Skin After Subcutaneous Injections.

Authors:  Kezia Ann Præstmark; Bente Stallknecht; Morten Lind Jensen; Thomas Sparre; Nils Berg Madsen; Jonas Kildegaard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 7.  Recognition of and steps to mitigate anxiety and fear of pain in injectable diabetes treatment.

Authors:  Davida F Kruger; Susan LaRue; Phil Estepa
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Identification and comparison of insulin pharmacokinetics injected with a new 4-mm needle vs 6- and 8-mm needles accounting for endogenous insulin and C-peptide secretion kinetics in non-diabetic adult males.

Authors:  Takahisa Hirose; Takeshi Ogihara; Shusaku Tozaka; Sami Kanderian; Hirotaka Watada
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.232

9.  The appropriateness of the length of insulin needles based on determination of skin and subcutaneous fat thickness in the abdomen and upper arm in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kang Hee Sim; Moon Sook Hwang; Sun Young Kim; Hye Mi Lee; Ji Yeun Chang; Moon Kyu Lee
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 5.376

10.  Nontraditional Considerations With Insulin Needle Length Selection.

Authors:  Katherine S O'Neal; Jeremy Johnson; Sajidah Swar
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2015-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.