Literature DB >> 21476674

A mathematical model of medial consonant identification by cochlear implant users.

Mario A Svirsky1, Elad Sagi, Ted A Meyer, Adam R Kaiser, Su Wooi Teoh.   

Abstract

The multidimensional phoneme identification model is applied to consonant confusion matrices obtained from 28 postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. This model predicts consonant matrices based on these subjects' ability to discriminate a set of postulated spectral, temporal, and amplitude speech cues as presented to them by their device. The model produced confusion matrices that matched many aspects of individual subjects' consonant matrices, including information transfer for the voicing, manner, and place features, despite individual differences in age at implantation, implant experience, device and stimulation strategy used, as well as overall consonant identification level. The model was able to match the general pattern of errors between consonants, but not the full complexity of all consonant errors made by each individual. The present study represents an important first step in developing a model that can be used to test specific hypotheses about the mechanisms cochlear implant users employ to understand speech.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476674      PMCID: PMC3087396          DOI: 10.1121/1.3531806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.

Authors:  G S Donaldson; D A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Mathematical modeling of vowel perception by users of analog multichannel cochlear implants: temporal and channel-amplitude cues.

Authors:  M A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory learning and adaptation after cochlear implantation: a preliminary study of discrimination and labeling of vowel sounds by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  M A Svirsky; A Silveira; H Suarez; H Neuburger; T T Lai; P M Simmons
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Diverse acoustic cues at consonantal landmarks.

Authors:  K N Stevens
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2000 Apr-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Acoustic and electrical pattern analysis of consonant perceptual cues used by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Su Wooi Teoh; Heidi S Neuburger; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Dawn Burton Koch; Mark Downing; Leonid Litvak
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A model of incomplete adaptation to a severely shifted frequency-to-electrode mapping by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-23

10.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  7 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Predicting the speech reception threshold of cochlear implant listeners using an envelope-correlation based measure.

Authors:  Nima Yousefian; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; E Katelyn Glassman
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  A physiological and behavioral system for hearing restoration with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Julia King; Ina Shehu; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.