Literature DB >> 21475430

Induction of labor with prostaglandin e2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix.

Abdul-Kareem Alsayegh1, Salah Roshdy, A Hany Akef, S Maha Youssef.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor is common in obstetric practice. According to the most current studies, the rate varies from 9.5 to 33.7 percent of all pregnancies annually. In the absence of a ripe or favorable cervix, a successful vaginal birth is less likely. Therefore, cervical ripening or preparedness for induction should be assessed before a regimen is selected. To objective is to study the pregnancy outcome of induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in women with one previous lower segment cesarean section.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at Maternity & Children Hospital, Buraidah (Qassim), Saudi Arabia. The sample included 153 consecutive women with one previous cesarean section, of whom 75 underwent induction of labor (study group) and 78 were admitted with spontaneous onset of labor (control group). Vaginal tablets of PGE2 were used for cervical ripening in the study group. Mode of delivery, neonatal outcome, indications for cesarean section, and rate of uterine rupture were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the study and control groups in mean (_S.D.) maternal age (30:9 _ 4:7 years versus 31:2 _ 4:8 years, P ¼ 0:6), gestational age at delivery (39:2 _ 1:8 weeks versus 39:3 _ 1:6 weeks, P ¼ 0:36), overall rate of cesarean section (24% versus 20.5%, P ¼ 0:8), rates of low 5-min Apgar score (3.1% versus 3.7%, P ¼ 0:67) or cesarean section performed for non-reassuring fetal heart rate (9.3% versus 7.69%, P ¼ 0:1). There were no cases of uterine rupture, in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section does not increase the risk of cesarean section rate and does not adversely affect immediate neonatal outcome. We cautiously suggest that when there is no absolute indication for repeated cesarean section, induction of labor may be considered.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21475430      PMCID: PMC3068644     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)        ISSN: 1658-3639


  17 in total

1.  Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery.

Authors:  D J Ravasia; S L Wood; J K Pollard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999.

Authors:  E L Mozurkewich; E K Hutton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  M Lydon-Rochelle; V L Holt; T R Easterling; D P Martin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Vaginal births after Caesarean (VBAC): a population study.

Authors:  C Stone; J Halliday; J Lumley; S Brennecke
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Uterine rupture after use of a prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert during vaginal birth after cesarean. A report of two cases.

Authors:  K S Raskin; J D Dachauer; A L Doeden; W F Rayburn
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.142

6.  Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery.

Authors:  D A Wing; K Lovett; R H Paul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section.

Authors:  M M Plaut; M L Schwartz; S L Lubarsky
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  C M Zelop; T D Shipp; J T Repke; A Cohen; A B Caughey; E Lieberman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case-control study.

Authors:  M A Esposito; C A Menihan; M P Malee
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2.

Authors:  Y Yogev; A Ben-Haroush; Y Gilboa; R Chen; B Kaplan; M Hod
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2003-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative diagnosis of premature rupture of membrane by nitrazine test, urea, and creatinine estimation.

Authors:  Adebunmi O Olarinoye; Noah O Olaomo; Kike T Adesina; Grace G Ezeoke; Abiodun P Aboyeji
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.