Literature DB >> 11084563

Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case-control study.

M A Esposito1, C A Menihan, M P Malee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a short interpregnancy interval is associated with uterine scar failure in laboring patients with previous low transverse cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a case-control study of uterine scar failures among laboring patients with previous low transverse cesarean delivery. Control patients underwent abdominal delivery during labor after failure of an attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the same month as case patients.
RESULTS: An interpregnancy interval of <6 months was significantly more prevalent among case patients with uterine scar failure (P =.02). Mean interpregnancy interval was less in all cases of uterine scar failure (P = .06).
CONCLUSIONS: Interpregnancy interval was inversely associated with likelihood of uterine scar failure during subsequent labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084563     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.109046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in obstetrics.

Authors:  Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-13

Review 2.  Impact of increasing inter-pregnancy interval on maternal and infant health.

Authors:  Amanda Wendt; Cassandra M Gibbs; Stacey Peters; Carol J Hogue
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  Induction of labor with prostaglandin e2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Abdul-Kareem Alsayegh; Salah Roshdy; A Hany Akef; S Maha Youssef
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-07

4.  Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Zarko Alfirevic; Patsy Spark; Peter Brocklehurst; Marian Knight
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Spectrum of maternal and perinatal outcomes among parturient women with preceding short inter-pregnancy interval at Bugando Medical Centre, Tanzania.

Authors:  Athanase Lilungulu; Dismas Matovelo; Albert Kihunrwa; Balthazar Gumodoka
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2015-01-22

6.  DECIDE: a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce non-medically indicated caesareans in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Charles Kaboré; Valéry Ridde; Séni Kouanda; Ludovic Queuille; Paul-André Somé; Isabelle Agier; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Uterine scar rupture at the site of the placenta accreta presenting as a case of sudden death.

Authors:  Swapnil Prabhakar Akhade; Pankaj Suresh Ghormade; Ajay Bhengra; Krishnadutt Chavali; Nighat Hussain
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Effects of interpregnancy interval on pregnancy complications: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amanuel Tesfay Gebremedhin; Annette K Regan; Eva Malacova; M Luke Marinovich; Stephen Ball; Damien Foo; Gavin Pereira
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Is there an optimal inter-delivery interval in women who underwent trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC)?

Authors:  Jiaming Rao; Dazhi Fan; Huiting Ma; Dongxin Lin; Huishan Zhang; Zixing Zhou; Pengsheng Li; Gengdong Chen; Demei Lu; Yan Liu; Zhaoxia Wu; Jieyun He; Xinjuan Liu; BingJie Peng; Xiaoling Guo; Zhengping Liu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.