Literature DB >> 21475011

Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study.

Fiona G M Taylor1, Philip Quirke, Richard J Heald, Brendan Moran, Lennart Blomqvist, Ian Swift, David J Sebag-Montefiore, Paris Tekkis, Gina Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-predicted good prognosis tumors treated by surgery alone.
BACKGROUND: The MERCURY study reported that high-resolution MRI can accurately stage rectal cancer. The routine policy in most centers involved in the MERCURY study was primary surgery alone in MRI-predicted stage II or less and in MRI "good prognosis" stage III with selective avoidance of neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on all patients included in the MERCURY study who were staged as MRI-defined "good" prognosis tumors. "Good" prognosis included MRI-predicted safe circumferential resection margins, with MRI-predicted T2/T3a/T3b (less than 5 mm spread from muscularis propria), regardless of MRI N stage. None received preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence were calculated.
RESULTS: Of 374 patients followed up in the MERCURY study, 122 (33%) were defined as "good prognosis" stage III or less on MRI. Overall and disease-free survival for all patients with MRI "good prognosis" stage I, II and III disease at 5 years was 68% and 85%, respectively. The local recurrence rate for this series of patients predicted to have a good prognosis tumor on MRI was 3%.
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative identification of good prognosis tumors using MRI will allow stratification of patients and better targeting of preoperative therapy. This study confirms the ability of MRI to select patients who are likely to have a good outcome with primary surgery alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21475011     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b8d52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  148 in total

Review 1.  [The role of cross-sectional imaging in staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  A O Schäfer; M Langer; T Baumann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Or why translational research is vital for the future treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  R Glynne-Jones; M Harrison
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  "Watch and wait" approach in rectal cancer patients following complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not compromise oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Gürel Neşşar; Ali Eba Demirbağ; Hasan Cem Mısırlıoğlu; Semih Sezer
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer 2013.

Authors:  J Maurel; C Grávalos; F Rivera; R Vera; E González Flores
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer and the role of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Valerie M Nelson; Al B Benson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Patterns of use and outcomes for radiation therapy in the Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial.

Authors:  Valerie Francescutti; Angela Coates; Lehana Thabane; Charles H Goldsmith; Mark N Levine; Marko Simunovic
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Dilara Akhoundova; Gema Bruixola; Jorge Aparicio
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Advances and challenges in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Contemporary management of locally advanced rectal cancer: Resolving issues, controversies and shifting paradigms.

Authors:  Aeris Jane D Nacion; Youn Young Park; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.