Literature DB >> 24284154

Patterns of use and outcomes for radiation therapy in the Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial.

Valerie Francescutti1, Angela Coates, Lehana Thabane, Charles H Goldsmith, Mark N Levine, Marko Simunovic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial targeted surgeon intraoperative technique and not radiation therapy (RT) use. We performed a post hoc analysis of RT use among patients in the QIRC trial, not by arm of trial but rather for the entire group. We wished to identify associations between local recurrence risk and use of preoperative, postoperative or no RT.
METHODS: We compared demographic, tumour and process of care measures among patients receiving preoperative, postoperative or no RT. A multivariable Cox regression model assessed local recurrence risk.
RESULTS: The QIRC trial enrolled 1015 patients at 16 hospitals between 2002 and 2004. Radiation therapy use did not differ between trial arms, and median follow-up was 3.6 years. For the preoperative, postoperative and no RT groups, respectively, the percentage of patients was 12.8%, 19.3% and 67.9%; the percentage of stage II/III tumours was 57.0%, 88.7% and 48.1%; and the local recurrence rate was 5.3%, 10.2% and 5.5% (p = 0.05). After controlling for patient and tumour characteristics, including tumour stage, the hazard ratio (HR) for local recurrence was increased in the postoperative RT versus the no RT group (HR 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.58, p = 0.027).
CONCLUSION: Use of preoperative RT was low; most patients with stage II/III disease did not receive RT and, as expected, the postoperative RT group had the highest risk of local recurrence. Our results suggest opportunities to improve rectal cancer RT use in Ontario.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24284154      PMCID: PMC3859789          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.019012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  21 in total

1.  Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Cammà; M Giunta; F Fiorica; L Pagliaro; A Craxì; M Cottone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Outcomes following a limited approach to radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Simunovic; S Jacob; A J Coates; K Vogt; B J Moran; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Effects of change in rectal cancer management on outcomes in British Columbia.

Authors:  P Terry Phang; Colleen E McGahan; Greg McGregor; John K MacFarlane; Carl J Brown; Manoj J Raval; Rona Cheifetz; John H Hay
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Cedermark; M Dahlberg; B Glimelius; L Påhlman; L E Rutqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Arbman; E Nilsson; O Hallböök; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 8,507 patients from 22 randomised trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Preoperative or postoperative therapy for stage II or III rectal cancer: an updated practice guideline.

Authors:  R K S Wong; S Berry; K Spithoff; M Simunovic; K Chan; O Agboola; B Dingle
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study.

Authors:  Fiona G M Taylor; Philip Quirke; Richard J Heald; Brendan Moran; Lennart Blomqvist; Ian Swift; David J Sebag-Montefiore; Paris Tekkis; Gina Brown
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer--implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit.

Authors:  Arne Wibe; Bjørn Møller; Jarle Norstein; Erik Carlsen; Johan N Wiig; Richard J Heald; Frøydis Langmark; Helge E Myrvold; Odd Søreide
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  1 in total

1.  Wide Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in the Management of Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer Across the English National Health Service.

Authors:  E J A Morris; P J Finan; K Spencer; I Geh; A Crellin; P Quirke; J D Thomas; S Lawton; R Adams; D Sebag-Montefiore
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.126

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.