Literature DB >> 21471846

Learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement using a high-resolution augmented reality simulator with haptic feedback.

Cristian J Luciano1, P Pat Banerjee, Brad Bellotte, G Michael Oh, Michael Lemole, Fady T Charbel, Ben Roitberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of a part-task simulator with 3D and haptic feedback as a training tool for a common neurosurgical procedure--placement of thoracic pedicle screws.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement on a high-performance augmented reality and haptic technology workstation.
METHODS: Fifty-one fellows and residents performed thoracic pedicle screw placement on the simulator. The virtual screws were drilled into a virtual patient's thoracic spine derived from a computed tomography data set of a real patient.
RESULTS: With a 12.5% failure rate, a 2-proportion z test yielded P = .08. For performance accuracy, an aggregate Euclidean distance deviation from entry landmark on the pedicle and a similar deviation from the target landmark in the vertebral body yielded P = .04 from a 2-sample t test in which the rejected null hypothesis assumes no improvement in performance accuracy from the practice to the test sessions, and the alternative hypothesis assumes an improvement.
CONCLUSION: The performance accuracy on the simulator was comparable to the accuracy reported in literature on recent retrospective evaluation of such placements. The failure rates indicated a minor drop from practice to test sessions, and also indicated a trend (P = .08) toward learning retention resulting in improvement from practice to test sessions. The performance accuracy showed a 15% mean score improvement and more than a 50% reduction in standard deviation from practice to test. It showed evidence (P = .04) of performance accuracy improvement from practice to test session.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21471846      PMCID: PMC3153609          DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821954ed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  22 in total

1.  Computer-assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement: an in vitro feasibility study.

Authors:  K D Kim; J Patrick Johnson; O Bloch BS; J E Masciopinto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T Laine; T Lund; M Ylikoski; J Lohikoski; D Schlenzka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement. Technical note.

Authors:  Langston T Holly; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; S Vidyadhara; Perumal Ramesh; Ajoy P Shetty
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Virtual ventriculostomy with 'shifted ventricle': neurosurgery resident surgical skill assessment using a high-fidelity haptic/graphic virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Michael Lemole; P Pat Banerjee; Cristian Luciano; Fady Charbel; Michael Oh
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.448

7.  Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bledsoe; Doug Fenton; Jeremy L Fogelson; Eric W Nottmeier
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in neuromuscular scoliosis with free-hand technique.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Seung Woo Suh; Harry Fernandez; Jae Hyuk Yang; Hae-Ryong Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using three-dimensional image guidance: experience in a large patient cohort.

Authors:  Eric W Nottmeier; Will Seemer; Phillip M Young
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-01

10.  Accuracy of pedicle and mass screw placement in the spine without using fluoroscopy: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Kadir Kotil; Turgay Bilge
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Development and content validation of performance assessments for endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

Authors:  Gerben E Breimer; Faizal A Haji; Eelco W Hoving; James M Drake
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  The role of simulation in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Giselle Coelho; Nelci Zanon; Benjamin Warf
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  The perceived efficacy and utility of spine bioskills curricula for resident and fellow education.

Authors:  Michael H McCarthy; Barrett S Boody; Peter R Swiatek; Brett D Rosenthal; Jason Savage; Wellington K Hsu; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-09

Review 4.  The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Dillon S Patel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 5.  Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew Hersh; Smruti Mahapatra; Carly Weber-Levine; Tolulope Awosika; John N Theodore; Hesham M Zakaria; Ann Liu; Timothy F Witham; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-14

6.  Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training.

Authors:  Ali Alaraj; Fady T Charbel; Daniel Birk; Matthew Tobin; Mathew Tobin; Cristian Luciano; Pat P Banerjee; Silvio Rizzi; Jeff Sorenson; Kevin Foley; Konstantin Slavin; Ben Roitberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Neurosurgical virtual reality simulation metrics to assess psychomotor skills during brain tumor resection.

Authors:  Hamed Azarnoush; Gmaan Alzhrani; Alexander Winkler-Schwartz; Fahad Alotaibi; Nicholas Gelinas-Phaneuf; Valérie Pazos; Nusrat Choudhury; Jawad Fares; Robert DiRaddo; Rolando F Del Maestro
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Assessing performance in brain tumor resection using a novel virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Nicholas Gélinas-Phaneuf; Nusrat Choudhury; Ahmed R Al-Habib; Anne Cabral; Etienne Nadeau; Vincent Mora; Valerie Pazos; Patricia Debergue; Robert DiRaddo; Rolando F Del Maestro
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 9.  Simulation and resident education in spinal neurosurgery.

Authors:  Parker E Bohm; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-02-26

10.  Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons.

Authors:  Ryan Lohre; Jeffrey C Wang; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Danny P Goel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.