Literature DB >> 21467283

Health outcomes after stopping conjugated equine estrogens among postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Andrea Z LaCroix1, Rowan T Chlebowski, JoAnn E Manson, Aaron K Aragaki, Karen C Johnson, Lisa Martin, Karen L Margolis, Marcia L Stefanick, Robert Brzyski, J David Curb, Barbara V Howard, Cora E Lewis, Jean Wactawski-Wende.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Women's Health Initiative Estrogen-Alone Trial was stopped early after a mean of 7.1 years of follow-up because of an increased risk of stroke and little likelihood of altering the balance of risk to benefit by the planned trial termination date. Postintervention health outcomes have not been reported.
OBJECTIVE: To examine health outcomes associated with randomization to treatment with conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) among women with prior hysterectomy after a mean of 10.7 years of follow-up through August 2009. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The intervention phase was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of 0.625 mg/d of CEE compared with placebo in 10,739 US postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years with prior hysterectomy. Follow-up continued after the planned trial completion date among 7645 surviving participants (78%) who provided written consent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were coronary heart disease (CHD) and invasive breast cancer. A global index of risks and benefits included these primary outcomes plus stroke, pulmonary embolism, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, and death.
RESULTS: The postintervention risk (annualized rate) for CHD among women assigned to CEE was 0.64% compared with 0.67% in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.25), 0.26% vs 0.34%, respectively, for breast cancer (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.51-1.09), and 1.47% vs 1.48%, respectively, for total mortality (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.18). The risk of stroke was no longer elevated during the postintervention follow-up period and was 0.36% among women receiving CEE compared with 0.41% in the placebo group (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.64-1.24), the risk of deep vein thrombosis was lower at 0.17% vs 0.27%, respectively (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), and the risk of hip fracture did not differ significantly and was 0.36% vs 0.28%, respectively (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.88-1.82). Over the entire follow-up, lower breast cancer incidence in the CEE group persisted and was 0.27% compared with 0.35% in the placebo group (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95). Health outcomes were more favorable for younger compared with older women for CHD (P = .05 for interaction), total myocardial infarction (P = .007 for interaction), colorectal cancer (P = .04 for interaction), total mortality (P = .04 for interaction), and global index of chronic diseases (P = .009 for interaction).
CONCLUSIONS: Among postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy followed up for 10.7 years, CEE use for a median of 5.9 years was not associated with an increased or decreased risk of CHD, deep vein thrombosis, stroke, hip fracture, colorectal cancer, or total mortality. A decreased risk of breast cancer persisted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21467283      PMCID: PMC3656722          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  39 in total

1.  Understanding the divergent data on postmenopausal hormone therapy.

Authors:  Francine Grodstein; Thomas B Clarkson; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Menopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C Schairer; J Lubin; R Troisi; S Sturgeon; L Brinton; R Hoover
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J David Curb; Anne McTiernan; Susan R Heckbert; Charles Kooperberg; Janet Stanford; Michael Nevitt; Karen C Johnson; Lori Proulx-Burns; Lisa Pastore; Michael Criqui; Sandra Daugherty
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Bone mass response to discontinuation of long-term hormone replacement therapy: results from the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Safety Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; Mark Espeland; Stacey Slone; Robert Marcus; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-03-25

Review 5.  Estrogen replacement therapy, atherosclerosis, and vascular function.

Authors:  Tomi S Mikkola; Thomas B Clarkson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  Rapid loss of hip fracture protection after estrogen cessation: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment.

Authors:  John Yates; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Suna Barlas; Ya-Ting Chen; Paul D Miller; Ethel S Siris
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study.

Authors:  Valerie Beral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Relationship between long durations and different regimens of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Kathleen E Malone; Peggy L Porter; Noel S Weiss; Mei-Tzu C Tang; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Janet R Daling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Susan L Hendrix; Robert D Langer; Marcia L Stefanick; Margery Gass; Dorothy Lane; Rebecca J Rodabough; Mary Ann Gilligan; Michele G Cyr; Cynthia A Thomson; Janardan Khandekar; Helen Petrovitch; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prognostic characteristics of breast cancer among postmenopausal hormone users in a screened population.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Donald L Weaver; Diana S M Buist; William E Barlow; Gary Cutter; Berta M Geller; Bonnie Yankaskas; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  166 in total

Review 1.  Aromatase, breast cancer and obesity: a complex interaction.

Authors:  Serdar E Bulun; Dong Chen; Irene Moy; David C Brooks; Hong Zhao
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 2.  Estrogen neuroprotection and the critical period hypothesis.

Authors:  Erin Scott; Quan-guang Zhang; Ruimin Wang; Ratna Vadlamudi; Darrell Brann
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Rowan T Chlebowski; Aaron K Aragaki; Lewis H Kuller; JoAnn E Manson; Margery Gass; Elizabeth Bluhm; Stephanie Connelly; F Allan Hubbell; Dorothy Lane; Lisa Martin; Judith Ockene; Thomas Rohan; Robert Schenken; Jean Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Breast cancer: Risk and mortality after oestrogen-alone therapy--is it safe?

Authors:  Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Correlation between auditory-vestibular functions and estrogen levels in postmenopausal patients with Meniere's disease.

Authors:  Huirong Jian; Gang Yu; Gang Chen; Naifen Lin; Haibo Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 6.  Obesity, energy balance, and cancer: new opportunities for prevention.

Authors:  Stephen D Hursting; John Digiovanni; Andrew J Dannenberg; Maria Azrad; Derek Leroith; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Madhuri Kakarala; Angela Brodie; Nathan A Berger
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-10-03

Review 7.  Neuroprotective action of acute estrogens: animal models of brain ischemia and clinical implications.

Authors:  Tomoko Inagaki; Anne M Etgen
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.668

8.  Ovariectomy is associated with metabolic impairments and enhanced mammary tumor growth in MKR mice.

Authors:  Sarit Ben-Shmuel; Eyal J Scheinman; Rola Rashed; Zila Shen Orr; Emily J Gallagher; Derek LeRoith; Ran Rostoker
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  Vaginal Estrogen Therapy for Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  M Moegele; S Buchholz; S Seitz; C Lattrich; O Ortmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Stage of the estrous cycle does not influence myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Chad R Frasier; David A Brown; Ruben C Sloan; Brian Hayes; Luke M Stewart; Hetal D Patel; Robert M Lust; Matthew D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.