Literature DB >> 21465156

Species diversity of Trichoderma in Poland.

Lidia Błaszczyk1, Delfina Popiel, Jerzy Chełkowski, Grzegorz Koczyk, Gary J Samuels, Krzysztof Sobieralski, Marek Siwulski.   

Abstract

In the present study, we reinvestigate the diversity of Trichoderma in Poland utilizing a combination of morphological and molecular/phylogenetic methods. A total of 170 isolates were collected from six different substrata at 49 sites in Poland. These were divided among 14 taxa as follows: 110 of 170 Trichoderma isolates were identified to the species level by the analysis of their ITS1, ITS2 rDNA sequences as: T. harzianum (43 isolates), T. aggressivum (35), T. citrinoviride (11), T. hamatum (9), T. virens (6), T. longibrachiatum (4), T. polysporum (1), and T. tomentosum (1); 60 isolates belonging to the Viride clade were identified based on a fragment of the translation-elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1) gene as: T. atroviride (20 isolates), T. gamsii (2), T. koningii (17), T. viridescens (13), T. viride (7), and T. koningiopsis (1). Identifications were made using the BLAST interface in TrichOKEY and TrichoBLAST ( http://www.isth.info ). The most diverse substrata were soil (nine species per 22 isolates) and decaying wood (nine species per 75 isolates). The most abundant species (25%) isolated from all substrata was T. harzianum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21465156      PMCID: PMC3088803          DOI: 10.1007/s13353-011-0039-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The fungal genus Trichoderma (Ascomycetes, Hypocreales) includes cosmopolitan soil-borne species that are frequently found also on decaying wood, compost, or other organic matter (Harman et al. 2004; Samuels 2006). Several Trichoderma species are significant biocontrol agents against fungal plant pathogens either through direct parasitism, competition with pathogens for nutrients, stimulators of plant health, or inducers of plant systemic resistance to pathogens (Hjeljord and Tronsmo 1998; Harman et al. 2004; Bailey et al. 2006). The ability for mycoparasitism in some species also has a negative economic impact in the commercial production of Agaricus bisporus (J.E. Lange) Imbach and Pleurotus ostreatus (Paulet) Rolland mushrooms, both of which are reported for Poland (Samuels et al. 2002; Krupke et al. 2003; Hatvani et al. 2007; Szczech et al. 2008). While Trichoderma is not pathogenic towards healthy mammals, there is a growing number of immunocompromised individuals who suffer opportunistic infections by some species (Kuhls et al. 1999; Kredics et al. 2003; Piens et al. 2004; Druzhinina et al. 2008), and volatile compounds produced by some Trichoderma species can cause allergic reactions (Tang et al. 2003; Caballero et al. 2007). Trichoderma species produce a wide diversity of metabolites, most notably commercially important cellulase and hemicellulases, antibiotics, peptaibiotics, as well as the toxins (such as trichodermamides) and trichothecenes that display in vitro cytotoxicity (Kubicek and Penttilä 1998; Sivasithamparam and Ghisalberti 1998; Garo et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2005; Nielsen et al. 2005; Degenkolb et al. 2006, 2008). Because of the intimate relationship between species of Trichoderma and human activity, there is a great need for the accurate identification of Trichoderma species. However, accurate species identification based on morphology is difficult at best because of the paucity and similarity of useful morphological characters (Druzhinina et al. 2005; De Respinis et al. 2010), and increasing numbers of morphologically cryptic species that can be distinguished only through their DNA characters are being described (Atanasova et al. 2010; Samuels et al. 2010). This has already resulted in incorrect identification and the propagation of errors for strains associated with the production of secondary metabolites (Humphris et al. 2002), with human diseases (Gautheret et al. 1995), and biological control (Kullnig et al. 2001). However, with the advent of molecular methods and identification tools, which are based on sequence analysis of multiple genes (rDNA and genes encoding actin, calmodulin, endochitinase, RNA polymerase II, and translation-elongation factor 1-alpha [tef1]), it is now possible to identify every Trichoderma isolate and/or recognize it as a putative new species (Druzhinina et al. 2005; Samuels 2006; Kubicek et al. 2008). At present, the International Subcommission on Trichoderma and Hypocrea Taxonomy lists 104 species, all of which have been characterized at the molecular level (http://www.isth.info). Seventy-five species of Hypocrea have been identified in temperate Europe, in particular, in Austria (Jaklitsch 2009). Nevertheless, the information about the diversity of Trichoderma/Hypocrea in Poland is scarce. A preliminary checklist of micromycetes in Poland reported 20 Trichoderma species (Mułenko et al. 2008). However, all of these species were identified between 1903 and 2002 based on morphological characters. The objective of the present study was to document the occurrence and species diversity of Trichoderma collected from different substrata and locations in Poland.

Materials and methods

Substrata, storage, and isolation of pure cultures

Fungal isolates investigated in this study were collected from pieces of decaying wood, cultivated mushroom compost, samples of soil (garden, forest), and cereal grain (triticale, maize) at 49 sites in Poland (Table 1). Samples of decaying wood with white or brown rot were collected in parks and forests of the Wielkopolska region of Poland, placed in paper bags, dried at room temperature if wet, and stored until isolation. The pieces of decaying wood were plated on saltwater nutrient agar (SNA, Nirenberg 1976) and incubated at 20°C for 6 days. Putative Trichoderma colonies were purified by two rounds of subculturing on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Oxoid). Pure culture were transferred to the tube containing SNA and stored at −4°C for further study. Trichoderma spp. originated from other substrata were isolated according to the method described by Mańka (1974). Thirty-seven isolates originating from mushroom compost at mushroom farms in Poznań and in Skierniewice, as well as from forest soil of the Wielkopolski National Park were kindly supplied by Profs. H. Kwaśna and M. Mańka, Department of Forest Pathology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, and by Dr M. Szczech, Department of Plant Protection, Research Institute of Vegetable Crops, Skierniewice.
Table 1

List of Trichoderma isolates included in this study

Culture codeSpeciesSources/localizationAllelic groupa NCBI GenBank accession number
ITS1, ITS2 tef1 ITS1, ITS2 tef1
AN 13 T. atroviride forest soil, WNPb cV3AT1HQ292784HQ292961
AN 14 T. atroviride forest soil, WNPcV3AT1HQ292785HQ292962
AN 19 T. atroviride forest soil, WNPcV3AT1HQ292786HQ292963
AN 21 T. hamatum forest soil, WNPHM1–HQ292850–
AN 22 T. gamsii forest soil, WNPcV9–HQ292951–
AN 35 T. atroviride maize kernels, RadzikówcV3AT2HQ292787HQ292953
AN 46 T. citrinoviride soilC1–HQ292839–
AN 55 T. polysporum soil––HQ292950–
AN 59 T. citrinoviride soilC1–HQ292840–
AN 61 T. harzianum soilHR7–HQ292866–
AN 68 T. virens compost, PuławyVS3–HQ292943–
AN 69 T. virens compost, PuławyVS3–HQ292944–
AN 70 T. virens compost, PuławyVS1–HQ292947–
AN 73 T. virens compost, PuławyVS3–HQ292945–
AN 74 T. virens compost, PuławyVS3–HQ292946–
AN 75 T. virens compost, PuławyVS1–HQ292948–
AN 89 T. citrinoviride garden soil, PoznańC1–HQ292841–
AN 90 T. atroviride garden soil, PoznańcV3AT2HQ292788HQ292954
AN 91 T. harzianum compost, PoznańHR6–HQ292860–
AN 92 T. harzianum maize kernels, RadzikówHR5–HQ292867–
AN 93 T. viridescens forest soil, Malta, PoznańcV5VD3HQ292927HQ292995
AN 94 T. harzianum forest soil, Malta Park, PoznańHR3–HQ292873–
AN 95 T. atroviride compost, PoznańcV3AT2HQ292789HQ292955
AN 96 T. atroviride compost, PoznańcV3AT2HQ292790HQ292956
AN 97 T. citrinoviride forest wood, WieluńC1–HQ292842–
AN 98 T. citrinoviride forest wood, WieluńC1–HQ292843–
AN 99 T. citrinoviride forest wood, WieluńC2–HQ292848–
AN 100 T. koningii forest wood, WieluńcV1KO1HQ292903HQ292975
AN 101 T. harzianum forest wood, WieluńHR5–HQ292868–
AN 102 T. citrinoviride forest wood, WieluńC1–HQ292844–
AN 104 T. koningii forest wood, Dziewicza Góra, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292904HQ292976
AN 105 T. koningii forest wood, Dziewicza Góra, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292905HQ292977
AN 106 T. koningii forest wood, Dziewicza Góra, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292906HQ292978
AN 107 T. koningii forest wood, Dziewicza Góra, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292907HQ292979
AN 108 T. harzianum forest wood, Dziewicza Góra, PoznańHR5–HQ292869–
AN 111 T. atroviride forest wood, Dziewicza Góra, PoznańcV3AT1HQ292791HQ292964
AN 113 T. koningii forest wood, Żurawiniec Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292908HQ292980
AN 114 T. koningii forest wood, Żurawiniec Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292909HQ292981
AN 115 T. koningii forest wood, Żurawiniec Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292910HQ292982
AN 116 T. koningii forest wood, Żurawiniec Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292911HQ292983
AN 117 T. koningii forest wood, Żurawiniec Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292912HQ292984
AN 118 T. hamatum forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańHM2–HQ292854–
AN 120 T. hamatum forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańHM2–HQ292855–
AN 121 T. koningii forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292913HQ292985
AN 122 T. viridescens forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańcV5VD4HQ292928HQ292994
AN 124 T. koningii forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292914HQ292986
AN 125 T. koningii forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292915HQ292987
AN 126 T. koningii forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańcV1KO2HQ292916HQ292991
AN 127 T. koningii forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292917HQ292988
AN 128 T. koningii forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańcV1KO1HQ292918HQ292989
AN 132 T. harzianum forest wood, Rusałka Park, PoznańHR5–HQ2928670–
AN 133 T. harzianum forest wood, Jeziory, WNPHR4–HQ292874–
AN 134 T. harzianum forest wood, Jeziory, WNPHR4–HQ292875–
AN 135 T. harzianum forest wood, Jeziory, WNPHR4–HQ292876–
AN 136 T. harzianum forest wood, Jeziory, WNPHR1–HQ292901–
AN 137 T. harzianum forest wood, Jeziory, WNPHR4–HQ292877–
AN 138 T. harzianum forest wood, Jeziory, WNPHR6–HQ292861–
AN 141 T. viride forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV6V12HQ292922HQ293008
AN 142 T. viride forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV8V12HQ292920HQ293009
AN 143 T. koningiopsis forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV4–HQ292929HQ292992
AN 144 T. koningii forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV1KO1HQ292919HQ292990
AN 145 T. viridescens forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV5VD3HQ292930HQ292996
AN 146 T. viridescens forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV5VD3HQ292931HQ292997
AN 147 T. viridescens forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV5VD3HQ292932HQ292998
AN 148 T. viridescens forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV5VD3HQ292933HQ292999
AN 149 T. viridescens forest wood, Jeziory, WNPcV5VD3HQ292934HQ293000
AN 150 T. harzianum forest wood, Jeziory, WNPHR4–HQ292878–
AN 152 T. atroviride triticale kernel, ChoryńcV3AT2HQ292792HQ292957
AN 153 T. atroviride triticale kernel, ChoryńcV3AT2HQ292793HQ292958
AN 155 T. hamatum rye rizosphera, LublinHM1–HQ292851–
AN 171 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, SkierniewiceAG2–HQ292807–
AN 172 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, SkierniewiceAG2–HQ292808–
AN 176 T. viride forest wood, Strzeszyn Park, PoznańcV8V13HQ292923HQ293010
AN 179 T. viride forest wood, Strzeszyn Park, PoznańcV8V13HQ292924HQ293011
AN 182 T. atroviride forest wood, Strzeszyn Park, PoznańcV2AT1HQ292794HQ292965
AN 188 T. atroviride mushroom compost, SkierniewicecV4AT2HQ292803HQ292959
AN 197 T. longibrachiatum mushroom factory, SkierniewiceL1–HQ292780–
AN 198 T. citrinoviride mushroom factory, SkierniewiceC1–HQ292845–
AN 199 T. citrinoviride mushroom factory, SkierniewiceC1–HQ2929846–
AN 201 T. citrinoviride mushroom factory, SkierniewiceC3–HQ292849–
AN 203 T. harzianum mushroom compost, PoznańHR4–HQ292879–
AN 205 T. harzianum mushroom compost, PoznańHR4–HQ292880–
AN 206 T. atroviride mushroom compost, PoznańcV4AT2HQ292804HQ292960
AN 207 T. harzianum mushroom compost, PoznańHR4–HQ292881–
AN 208 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, PoznańAG1–HQ292805–
AN 209 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, PoznańAG1–HQ292882–
AN 211 T. harzianum mushroom compost, PoznańHR4–HQ292882–
AN 212 T. atroviride mushroom compost, PoznańcV3AT1HQ292795HQ292966
AN 213 T. longibrachiatum mushroom compost, PoznańL1–HQ292781–
AN 215 T. atroviride mushroom compost, PoznańcV3AT1HQ292796HQ292967
AN 216 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, PoznańAG2–HQ292809–
AN 223 T. harzianum forest soil, WNPHR2–HQ292902–
AN 225 T. hamatum forest soil, WNPHM21–HQ292856–
AN 226 T. viridescens forest soil, WNPcV5VD1HQ292935HQ293004
AN 227 T. viridescens forest soil, WNPcV5VD5HQ292936HQ293001
AN 229 T. viridescens forest soil, WNPcV5VD5HQ292937HQ293002
AN 231 T. viridescens forest soil, WNPcV5VD2HQ292938HQ293003
AN 232 T. hamatum forest soil, WNPHM1–HQ292852–
AN 234 T. tomentosum forest soil, WNP––HQ292949–
AN 235 T. viride forest soil, WNPcV7VI1HQ292921HQ293013
AN 238 T. hamatum forest soil, WNPHM1–HQ292853–
AN 257 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR4–HQ292883–
AN 258 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR5–HQ292871–
AN 259 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR5–HQ292872–
AN 260 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR4–HQ292884–
AN 261 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR4–HQ292885–
AN 262 T. citrinoviride forest wood, RadojewoC1–HQ292847–
AN 263 T. longibrachiatum mushroom compost, PoznańL1–HQ292782–
AN 264 T. longibrachiatum mushroom compost, PoznańL2–HQ292783–
AN 266 T. viride mushroom compost, PoznańcV8VI3HQ292925HQ293012
AN 273 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292886–
AN 274 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292887–
AN 275 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292888–
AN 276 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292889–
AN 277 T. hamatum forest wood, KórnikHM1–HQ292857–
AN 278 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292890–
AN 279 T. hamatum forest wood, KórnikHM1–HQ292858–
AN 281 T. atroviride forest wood, KórnikcV2AT3HQ292804HQ292974
AN 282 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292891–
AN 283 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292892–
AN 284 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292893–
AN 285 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292894–
AN 286 T. harzianum forest wood, KórnikHR4–HQ292895–
AN 287 T. atroviride forest wood, RadojewocV3AT1HQ292798HQ292969
AN 288 T. viridescens forest wood, KórnikcV5VD1HQ292941HQ293006
AN 425t T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR4–HQ292896–
AN 426 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR4–HQ292897–
AN 427 T. viridescens forest wood, RadojewocV5VD1HQ292942HQ293007
AN 430 T. viride forest wood, RadojewocV8VI1HQ292926HQ293014
AN 431 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR4–HQ292898–
AN 435 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR4–HQ292899–
AN 436 T. atroviride forest wood, RadojewocV3AT1HQ292799HQ292970
AN 437 T. harzianum forest wood, RadojewoHR4–HQ292900–
AN 550 T. gamsii forest wood, PoznańcV9–HQ292952–
AN 561 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, Nowy TomyślAG2–HQ292810–
AN 562 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, OstródaAG2–HQ292811–
AN 563 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, ToruńAG2–HQ292812–
AN 564 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, ŁomżaAG2–HQ292813–
AN 565 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, SiemiatyczeAG2–HQ292814–
AN 566 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, OlsztynAG2–––
AN 567 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, TychyAG2–HQ292815–
AN 568 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, BytomAG2–HQ292816–
AN 569 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, ŁosiceAG2–HQ292817–
AN 570 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, Biała PodlaskaAG2–HQ292818–
AN 571 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, MiędzychódAG2–HQ292819–
AN 572 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, Gorzów Wlkp.AG2–HQ292820–
AN 573 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, PrzemyślAG2–HQ292821–
AN 574 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, SiedlceAG2–HQ292822–
AN 575 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, Sokołów PodlaskiAG2–HQ292823–
AN 576 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, ChojniceAG2–HQ292824–
AN 577 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, SzczecinekAG2–HQ292825–
AN 578 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, Krosno LubuskieAG2–HQ292826–
AN 579 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, Zielona GóraAG2–HQ292827–
AN 580 T. harzianum mushroom compost, PszczynaHR6–HQ292862–
AN 581 T. harzianum mushroom compost, Marianów/KołoHR6–HQ292863–
AN 582 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, TurekAG3–HQ292835–
AN 583 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, CzłuchówAG3–HQ292836–
AN 584 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, PiłaAG3–HQ292837–
AN 585 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, SkierniewiceAG2–HQ292828–
AN 586 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, ŚwiecieAG2–HQ292829–
AN 587 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, SkierniewiceAG3–HQ292838–
AN 590 T. harzianum mushroom compost, Piasek/PszczynaHR6–HQ292864–
AN 591 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, WolsztynAG2–HQ292830–
AN 592 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, RzeszówAG2–HQ292831–
AN 593 T. atroviride mushroom compost, PszczynacV3AT1HQ292800HQ292971
AN 594 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, RakoniewiceAG2–HQ292832–
AN 595 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, WielichowoAG2–HQ292833–
AN 596 T. atroviride mushroom compost, JarocincV3AT1HQ292801HQ292972
AN 597 T. harzianum mushroom compost, KaliszHR6–HQ292865–
AN 599 T. aggressivum mushroom compost, PszczynaAG2–HQ292834–
AN 600 T. atroviride mushroom compost, PszczynacV3AT1HQ292802–

aThe group of isolates possessing identical alleles in the locus of ITS or tef1, analyzed in the present study(Figs. 1 and 2)

bWNP: Wielkopolski National Park

List of Trichoderma isolates included in this study aThe group of isolates possessing identical alleles in the locus of ITS or tef1, analyzed in the present study(Figs. 1 and 2)
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of the 170 Trichoderma isolates inferred by parsimony analysis of ITS1, ITS 2 sequences. Sequences obtained during this study are listed by their GenBank numbers in Table 1. The numbers given over branches indicate bootstrap coefficient >50%. The symbols given on the right (HR, AG, L, C, HM, cV) indicate the allelic groups of isolates, forming on the basis of ITS sequences identity. The isolates belonging to individual allelic groups are listed in Table 1

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree of the 60 Trichoderma isolates inferred by parsimony analysis of tef1 sequences. Sequences obtained during this study are listed by their GenBank numbers in Table 1. The numbers given over branches indicate bootstrap coefficient >50%. The symbols given on the right (KO, VI, AT, VD) indicate the allelic groups of isolates, forming on the basis of tef1 sequences identity. The isolates belonging to individual allelic groups are listed in Table 1

bWNP: Wielkopolski National Park

Morphological analysis

Fungal colonies were grown on PDA and SNA at 25°C for 7 days. Trichoderma species were identified according to Gams and Bissett (1998) and Samuels et al. (2002, 2009; http://nt.ars-grin.gov/taxadescriptions/keys/TrichodermaIndex.cfm).

Isolation of DNA

Mycelium for DNA extraction was obtained by inoculating Czapek-Dox broth (Sigma) with Yeast Extract (Oxoid) and streptomycin sulfate (50 mg/L−1, AppliChem), and after incubation at 25°C for 21 days on a rotary shaker (120 rpm). Mycelium was collected on filter paper in a Büchner funnel, washed with sterile water, frozen at −20°C, and freeze-dried. Total DNA was extracted using the CTAB method (Doohan et al. 1998).

PCR amplification and sequencing

Primary identification was based on the sequencing of internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2) of the rRNA gene cluster. In cases where ITS1 and ITS2 did not provide unambiguous identification, a fragment of the translation-elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1) gene was sequenced. The ITS region of the rDNA of 170 isolates was amplified using primers ITS4, ITS5 (White et al. 1990). A fragment of tef1 gene containing the 4th and 5th introns was amplified using the primers Ef728M (Carbone and Kohn 1999) and tef1R (Kullnig-Gradinger et al. 2002). The PCR reaction was carried out in a 25-μl reaction mixture containing the following: 1 μl 50 ng/μl of DNA, 2.5 μl 10 × PCR buffer (50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 0.1% Triton X-100), 1.5 μl 10 mM dNTP (GH Healthcare), 0.2 μl 100 mM of each primer, 19.35 μl MQ H2O, 0.25 μl (2 U/μl) DyNAzymeTM II DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes). Amplifications were performed in either a PTC-200 or PTC-100 thermocycler (MJ Research, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturation 5 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 58°C (for the ITS region), or 63°C (for the tef1 fragment), 1 min at 72°C, with the final extension of 10 min at 72°C. Amplification products were separated on 1.5% agarose gel (Invitrogen) in 1 × TBE buffer (0.178 M Tris-borate, 0.178 M boric acid, 0.004 M EDTA) and stained with ethidium bromide. The 10-μl PCR products were combined with 2 μl of loading buffer (0.25% bromophenol blue, 30% glycerol). A 100-bp DNA Ladder Plus (Fermentas) was used as a size standard. PCR products were electrophoresed at 3 Vcm−1 for about 2 h, visualized under UV light, and photographed (Syngene UV visualizer). The 3-μl PCR products were purified with exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase according to Chełkowski et al. (2003). Sequencing reactions were prepared using the ABI Prism BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit in 5 μl volume (Applied Biosystems, Switzerland). DNA sequencing was performed on an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (USA). Sequences were edited and assembled using Chromas v.1.43 (Applied Biosystems). CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al. 1994) and MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) were used to align the sequences; the resulting alignments were inspected and refined manually.

Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis

For species identification, ITS1 and ITS 2 sequences were submitted to the BLAST interface in TrichOKEY (http://www.isth.info; Druzhinina et al. 2005; Druzhinina and Kubicek 2005). In ambiguous cases, the result was re-checked using the TrichoBLAST program based on tef1 gene sequences (Druzhinina and Kopchinskiy 2004a, b). All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated from the dataset. Phylogenetic analyses were performed in MEGA4 (Tamura et al. 2004). Both ITS1, ITS2 and tef1 gene sequences were analyzed using the maximum parsimony (Eck and Dayhoff 1966) approach of close-neighbor-interchange algorithm with search level 3 (Nei and Kumar 2000), in which the initial trees were obtained with the random addition of sequences (10,000 replicates). In total, there were 48 parsimony informative positions retained from an initial alignment of 368 for the ITS1, ITS2 sequences and 491 positions in the final dataset, of which 118 were parsimony informative for tef1 gene sequences. In both cases, to infer the consensus, phylogenetic trees bootstrapping with 10,000 data replicates was conducted (Felsenstein 1985).

Results

Species identification

A total of 170 isolates were obtained from the six different substrata at 49 localities in Poland. Of theses 170 Trichoderma isolates, 110 were identified at the species level by morphological characteristics and analysis of their ITS1, ITS2 nucleotide sequences as: T. harzianum Rifai (43 isolates), T. aggressivum Samuels & W. Gams (35), T. citrinoviride Bisset (11), T. hamatum (Bonord.) Bainier (9), T. virens (J.H. Mill., Giddens & A.A. Foster) Arx (6), T. longibrachiatum Rifai (4), T. polysporum (Link) Rifai (1), and T. tomentosum Bissett (1). In case of the remaining 60 Trichoderma isolates, where ITS1 and ITS2 did not provide unambiguous identification, the fragment of the tef1 gene was sequenced. Thereby, the following species were identified: T. atroviride P. Karst. (20 isolates), T. gamsii Samuels & Druzhin. (2), T. koningii Oudem. (17), T. viridescens (A.S. Horne & H.S. Will.) Jaklitsch & Samuels (13), T. viride Pers. (7), and T. koningiopsis Oudem. (1). The identification, origin, and NCBI GeneBank accession numbers of all isolates are given in Table 1.

Phylogenetic analysis

The result of the phylogenetic analysis based on the ITS sequences of 170 Trichoderma isolates is shown in Fig. 1. In the ITS tree, the Harzianum clade, with T. harzianum, T. aggressivum, and T. tomentosum, the Longibrachiatum Clade, with T. longibrachiatum and T. citrinoviride, and the species T. virens, T. hamatum, and T. polysporum were distinguished in a single moderately supported branch with bootstrap support of 79%. Forty-three strains were identified as T. harzianum, but this species is known to include several ITS alleles (Hermosa et al. 2004; Migheli et al. 2009) and is considered to be a species complex (Chaverri et al. 2003). In the present research, seven haplotypes of T. harzianum were found (HR1, HR2, HR3, HR4, HR5, HR6, and HR7, according to Table 1 and Fig. 1). With bootstrap support of only 53%, these seven haplotypes of T. harzianum formed a moderately well-supported (75%) clade with T. aggressivum and an unresolved polytomy with T. tomentosum. Two groups were distinguished within the Longibrachiatum clade with moderate to good bootstrap support. One group, with a bootstrap value of 70%, contains four strains of T. longibrachiatum. The second group, with a bootstrap value of 93% includes 11 strains of T. citrinoviride. Sixty isolates of Trichoderma, belonging to the Viride clade, formed a polytomy. A phylogenetic analysis based on tef1 sequences was performed for them (Fig. 2). As a result of this, the six species (T. koningii, T. atroviride, T. viride, T. viridescens, T. gamsii) were resolved with high bootstrap support. Phylogenetic tree of the 170 Trichoderma isolates inferred by parsimony analysis of ITS1, ITS 2 sequences. Sequences obtained during this study are listed by their GenBank numbers in Table 1. The numbers given over branches indicate bootstrap coefficient >50%. The symbols given on the right (HR, AG, L, C, HM, cV) indicate the allelic groups of isolates, forming on the basis of ITS sequences identity. The isolates belonging to individual allelic groups are listed in Table 1 Phylogenetic tree of the 60 Trichoderma isolates inferred by parsimony analysis of tef1 sequences. Sequences obtained during this study are listed by their GenBank numbers in Table 1. The numbers given over branches indicate bootstrap coefficient >50%. The symbols given on the right (KO, VI, AT, VD) indicate the allelic groups of isolates, forming on the basis of tef1 sequences identity. The isolates belonging to individual allelic groups are listed in Table 1

Species diversity

Fourteen species of Trichoderma were identified among 170 isolates collected from six different substrata and 49 localities in Poland, using both morphological and molecular analysis. The highest diversity of Trichoderma species was detected in the set of 22 isolates originating from soil, which included nine species (T. atroviride, T. citrinoviride, T. gamsii, T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. polysporum, T. tomentosum, T. viride, T. viridescens). Most of the isolates were collected from decaying wood (75), but among them, only nine species were found (T. atroviride, T. citrinoviride, T. gamsii, T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. koningii, T. koningiopsis, T. viride, T. viridescens). The single strains of T. polysporum and T. tomentosum were isolated from soil, whereas all 17 strains of T. koningii were isolated from forest wood at several sites. The 58 isolates from mushroom compost and mushroom farms comprised seven species: T. aggressivum, T. atroviride, T. citrinoviride, T. harzianum, T. longibrachiatum, T. virens, and T. viride. In the limited samples from grains of Zea mays and Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus as well as from garden compost, only three species were identified: T. atroviride, T. harzianum, and T. virens. T. harzianum was the most abundant species (25%) and was isolated from all substrata. It was the most common species isolated from pieces of decaying wood (40%, 30 isolates). After T, harzianum, T. atroviride, T. koningii, T. viridescens, and T. citrinoviride were the most abundant (respectively, 12%, 15%, 12%, and 7% of 112 isolates) Trichoderma species collected from soil, compost, forest wood, and cereal grains, respectively. The most common species isolated from mushroom compost was T. aggressivum (60% of isolates originated from mushroom compost and 20% of all isolates from the collection). T. hamatum, T. virens, T. viride, T. longibrachiatum, T. gamsii, T. koningiopsis, T. polysporum, and T. tomentosum were the most scarcely identified species of the genus (≤5% of all isolates from the collection).

Discussion

The present study is a preliminary domestic assessment of Trichoderma diversity in Poland. A collection of 170 isolates obtained from six different substrata and 49 localities in Poland were identified by phenetic observations and by analysis of the ITS 1, ITS 2 region of rRNA gene cluster and/or a fragment of the tef1 gene. A wide diversity of Trichoderma isolates was found (14 species were identified among 170 isolates) in comparison with the studies on the biodiversity of Trichoderma in South-East Asia (Kubicek et al. 2003), in Austria (Wuczkowski et al. 2003), in South America (Druzhinina et al. 2005), in China (Zhang et al. 2005), and on Sardinia (Migheli et al. 2009). The highest diversity of Trichoderma was found in Colombia, Mexico, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Ecuador, and Brazil (Hoyos-Carvajal et al. 2009). Hoyos-Carvajal et al. (2009) recorded almost twice as many species from a comparably sized sample of 183 isolates collected in these neotropical regions. Here and in a previous study, T. harzianum was the predominant taxon (Kubicek et al. 2003; Wuczkowski et al. 2003; Druzhinina et al. 2005, 2010; Zhang et al. 2005; Migheli et al. 2009). T. harzianum is the most commonly reported species in the genus, occurring in diverse ecosystems and ecological niches. However, it must be borne in mind that the name ‘T. harzianum’ applies to a species complex within which several morphologically cryptic phylogenetic species—haplotypes—are found (results presented here) and these ‘haplotype species’ may be seen to comprise a multiplicity of species when subjected to multilocus phylogenetic analysis (Chaverri et al. 2003; Gherbawy et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2005; Druzhinina et al. 2010). In the present research, seven haplotypes (HR1–HR7) were evident in the analysis of ITS sequences for T. harzianum isolates. Haplotypes HR1, HR3, HR4, HR5, HR6, and HR7 correspond with ITS haplotypes, which are very common in Europe (Jaklitsch 2009, Chaverri et al. [unpublished]; Woo et al. [unpublished]). Haplotype HR2 (isolate AN 223) corresponds to the ex neo type strain of T. harzianum CBS 226.95, and, thus, represents T. harzianum sensu stricto. T. harzianum sensu stricto is also a species with a broad north temperate distribution, including at least North America, Europe, and Asia (Zhang et al. 2005; Chaverri and Samuels [unpublished]). The second abundant species identified in the present study and the most prevalent species from mushroom compost was T. aggressivum (35 isolates). This result corresponds with the previous study of Szczech et al. (2008), who showed that, between 2004 and 2006, T. aggressivum was the most frequently isolated species of the genus identified in Polish mushroom farms. T. aggressivum has been isolated from mushroom compost used for A. bisporus cultivation in Europe and North America (Samuels et al. 2002). This species has only been isolated once from soil in Kenya (Samuels and Szakacs [unpublished]). It is not yet known whether this species also occurs in natural environments. Other species identified in the present study were: T. atroviride (20 isolates), T. koningii (17), T. viridescens (13), T. citrinoviride (11), T. hamatum (9), T. viride (7), T. virens (6), T. longibrachiatum (4), T. gamsii (2), T. koningiopsis (1), T. polysporum (1), and T. tomentosum (1). These species are representative of a temperate Trichoderma biota (Kubicek et al. 2008). T. viride, T. viridescens, T. koningii, T. citrinoviride, T. aggressivum, T. tomentosum, and T. polysporum are rather restricted to temperate regions. However, T. longibrachiatum, T. virens, T. koningiopsis, T. hamatum, and T. atroviride were also found in the neotropical study (Hoyos-Carvajal et al. 2009). The current results suggested that the most diverse habitats were soil (nine species per 22 isolates) and decaying wood (nine species per 75 isolates) gathered in parks and forests of the Wielkopolska region of Poland. The decaying wood was also the substrata from which the most isolates of Trichoderma (75) were collected. In this connection, we will continue to analyze the genetic and metabolic biodiversity of Trichoderma isolates originating from Polish mountains and isolated from forest wood with decay symptoms.
  35 in total

1.  Species pattern and genetic diversity of Trichoderma in a mid-European, primeval floodplain-forest.

Authors:  Michael Wuczkowski; Irina Druzhinina; Youssuf Gherbawy; Brigitte Klug; Hansjörg Prillinger; Christian P Kubicek
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.415

2.  An oligonucleotide barcode for species identification in Trichoderma and Hypocrea.

Authors:  Irina S Druzhinina; Alexei G Kopchinskiy; Monika Komoń; John Bissett; George Szakacs; Christian P Kubicek
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.495

3.  Trichoderma: systematics, the sexual state, and ecology.

Authors:  Gary J Samuels
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Genetic and metabolic diversity of Trichoderma: a case study on South-East Asian isolates.

Authors:  Christian P Kubicek; John Bissett; Irina Druzhinina; Cornelia Kullnig-Gradinger; George Szakacs
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.495

5.  Trichothecene production by Trichoderma brevicompactum.

Authors:  Kristian Fog Nielsen; Tom Gräfenhan; Doustmorad Zafari; Ulf Thrane
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 5.279

6.  Clonal species Trichoderma parareesei sp. nov. likely resembles the ancestor of the cellulase producer Hypocrea jecorina/T. reesei.

Authors:  Lea Atanasova; Walter M Jaklitsch; Monika Komoń-Zelazowska; Christian P Kubicek; Irina S Druzhinina
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Trichodermamide A and aspergillazine A, two cytotoxic modified dipeptides from a marine-derived fungus Spicaria elegans.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Qian-Qun Gu; Wei-Ming Zhu; Cheng-Bin Cui; Guo-Tao Fan
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.946

8.  Alternative reproductive strategies of Hypocrea orientalis and genetically close but clonal Trichoderma longibrachiatum, both capable of causing invasive mycoses of humans.

Authors:  Irina S Druzhinina; Monika Komoń-Zelazowska; László Kredics; Lóránt Hatvani; Zsuzsanna Antal; Temesgen Belayneh; Christian P Kubicek
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 9.  Clinical importance of the genus Trichoderma. A review.

Authors:  L Kredics; Zsuzsanna Antal; Ilona Dóczi; L Manczinger; F Kevei; Elisabeth Nagy
Journal:  Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.048

10.  Allergic fungal sinusitis associated with Trichoderma longibrachiatum.

Authors:  Patrick Tang; Subhash Mohan; Lynne Sigler; Ian Witterick; Richard Summerbell; Iivi Campbell; Tony Mazzulli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  27 in total

1.  Biodiversity of Trichoderma (Hypocreaceae) in Southern Europe and Macaronesia.

Authors:  W M Jaklitsch; H Voglmayr
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 16.097

2.  Comparative analysis of microsatellites in five different antagonistic Trichoderma species for diversity assessment.

Authors:  Shalini Rai; Prem Lal Kashyap; Sudheer Kumar; Alok Kumar Srivastava; Pramod W Ramteke
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Identification patterns of Trichoderma strains using morphological characteristics, phylogenetic analyses and lignocellulolytic activities.

Authors:  Azriah Asis; Saleh Ahmed Shahriar; Laila Naher; Suryani Saallah; Hasan Nudin Nur Fatihah; Vijay Kumar; Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Trichoderma biodiversity in China.

Authors:  Rui-yan Sun; Zhi-cheng Liu; Kehe Fu; Lili Fan; Jie Chen
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Male gametogenesis and sterility in garlic (Allium sativum L.): barriers on the way to fertilization and seed production.

Authors:  Einat Shemesh Mayer; Krystyna Winiarczyk; Lidia Błaszczyk; Arkadiusz Kosmala; Haim D Rabinowitch; Rina Kamenetsky
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Genetic diversity and species pattern of Trichoderma and Hypocrea in Manipur using in silico analysis.

Authors:  Thongram Kamala; Sarangthem Indira Devi; Gourshyam Thingnam; Bharat Gopalrao Somkuwar
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2013-01-18

7.  Biotransformation of Trichoderma spp. and their tolerance to aromatic amines, a major class of pollutants.

Authors:  Angélique Cocaign; Linh-Chi Bui; Philippe Silar; Laetitia Chan Ho Tong; Florent Busi; Aazdine Lamouri; Christian Mougin; Fernando Rodrigues-Lima; Jean-Marie Dupret; Julien Dairou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Blue pigment in Hypocrea caerulescens sp. nov. and two additional new species in sect. Trichoderma.

Authors:  Walter M Jaklitsch; Marc Stadler; Hermann Voglmayr
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Disentangling the Trichoderma viridescens complex.

Authors:  W M Jaklitsch; G J Samuels; A Ismaiel; H Voglmayr
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 11.051

10.  The Longibrachiatum Clade of Trichoderma: a revision with new species.

Authors:  Gary J Samuels; Adnan Ismaiel; Temesgen B Mulaw; George Szakacs; Irina S Druzhinina; Christian P Kubicek; Walter M Jaklitsch
Journal:  Fungal Divers       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 20.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.