| Literature DB >> 21465111 |
Raphaël Duivenvoorden1, Zahi A Fayad.
Abstract
Decreased level of high density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is a rigorous predictor for future cardiovascular events. Much effort is being made to develop HDL-C-raising pharmacotherapies in the attempt to avert the pandemic of atherosclerotic disease. Important properties by which HDL-C-raising compounds are effective involve improvement of cholesterol uptake from macrophages in plaque for transport back to the liver, improvement of endothelial function, and anti-inflammatory effects. Vascular imaging can aid in the determination which HDL-C-raising compounds are effective. Ultrasound and MRI have proved suitable for assessment of structural changes of the vessel wall. Ultrasound can also be used or assessment of endothelial function. 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography has opened up the possibility to assess vessel wall inflammation. In this article we discuss these various imaging techniques and how they can assess efficacy as well as provide pathophysiologic information on the mechanism of action of novel HDL-C-raising drugs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21465111 PMCID: PMC3085734 DOI: 10.1007/s11883-011-0176-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep ISSN: 1523-3804 Impact factor: 5.113
Fig. 1Various imaging modalities that can address different processes in atherosclerosis. Upper left: brachial artery endothelial function measurement with ultrasound (courtesy of Eric de Groot). The brachial artery diameter is measured at baseline and after cuff release and used to calculate the flow-dependent vasodilatation. Lower left: carotid vessel wall thickness measurement by ultrasound on the left (courtesy of Eric de Groot) and MRI on the right (courtesy of Aart Nederveen). Upper right: MRI of carotid artery plaque composition (courtesy of Aart Nederveen). Lower right: 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT imaging of carotid artery plaque. Plaque calcification is visible on the CT scan (courtesy of Jan Bucerius)
Various imaging modalities that can be used for assessment of HDL-C–raising drugs
| Imaging modality | Outcome parameter | Reproducibility(ICC) | Predictive value of future CVD | Correlation with HDL-C | HDL-C–raising drugs investigated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vessel wall thickening | US | IMT | >0.90 [ | HR 1.15 per 0.10 mm IMT difference [ | Yes [ | Niacin [ |
| Plaque vulnerability | MRI | MWA or NWI | >0.95 [ | Under investigation [ | Yes [ | Niacin [ |
| MRI | AHA plaque type, LRNC, IPH, calcification | >0.90 [ | HR 5–17 for presence of IPH or plaque rupture [ | No [ | Niacin [ | |
| Endothelial function | US | FMD (%) | >0.85 [ | HR 0.84–0.91 per SD of FMD [ | Yes [ | Niacin [ |
| Vessel wall inflammation | FDG-PET | SUV or TBR | >0.90 [ | Under investigation [ | Yes [ | Dalcetrapib |
AHA—American Heart Association; CVD—cardiovascular disease; FDG-PET—18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; FMD—flow-mediated vasodilatation; HDL-C—high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR—hazard ratio; ICC— intraclass correlation coefficient; IMT—intima-media thickness; IPH—intraplaque hemorrhage; LRNC—lipid-rich necrotic core; MWA—mean wall area; NWI—normalized wall index; rHDL—reconstituted high-density lipoprotein; SUV—standard uptake value; TBR—target-to-background ratio; US—ultrasound.