OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in a large multi-ethnic elderly cohort. BACKGROUND: Brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a physiologic measure and carotid IMT is an anatomic structural measure of subclinical atherosclerosis. Both brachial FMD and carotid IMT have been associated with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular events. The relationship between brachial FMD and carotid IMT is less clear especially in older adults. METHODS: Brachial FMD, carotid IMT and traditional cardiovascular risk factors were measured in 2338 adults, age 72-98 years who were participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The relationship between FMD and IMT was assessed both unadjusted and also after adjusting for age, gender and race/ethnicity, BMI, HDL, LDL, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, current smoking, diabetes mellitus, hormone therapy and prior CVD. RESULTS: Both brachial FMD and carotid IMT correlated significantly with age, HDL levels, waist/hip ratio, serum cholesterol and number of CV risk factors. Brachial FMD was not associated with CCA IMT in this elderly cohort (Pearson partial correlation coefficient=-0.0252, p=0.222). In the adjusted linear regression model with CCA IMT as the dependent variable, brachial FMD was also not associated with CCA IMT (beta coefficient=-0.006, p=0.470). CONCLUSION: Brachial FMD and CCA IMT are not related in population-based older adults. Brachial FMD and CCA IMT may be distinct and independent stages in the complex atherosclerotic process.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in a large multi-ethnic elderly cohort. BACKGROUND: Brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a physiologic measure and carotid IMT is an anatomic structural measure of subclinical atherosclerosis. Both brachial FMD and carotid IMT have been associated with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular events. The relationship between brachial FMD and carotid IMT is less clear especially in older adults. METHODS:Brachial FMD, carotid IMT and traditional cardiovascular risk factors were measured in 2338 adults, age 72-98 years who were participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The relationship between FMD and IMT was assessed both unadjusted and also after adjusting for age, gender and race/ethnicity, BMI, HDL, LDL, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, current smoking, diabetes mellitus, hormone therapy and prior CVD. RESULTS: Both brachial FMD and carotid IMT correlated significantly with age, HDL levels, waist/hip ratio, serum cholesterol and number of CV risk factors. Brachial FMD was not associated with CCA IMT in this elderly cohort (Pearson partial correlation coefficient=-0.0252, p=0.222). In the adjusted linear regression model with CCA IMT as the dependent variable, brachial FMD was also not associated with CCA IMT (beta coefficient=-0.006, p=0.470). CONCLUSION:Brachial FMD and CCA IMT are not related in population-based older adults. Brachial FMD and CCA IMT may be distinct and independent stages in the complex atherosclerotic process.
Authors: L P Fried; N O Borhani; P Enright; C D Furberg; J M Gardin; R A Kronmal; L H Kuller; T A Manolio; M B Mittelmark; A Newman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 1991-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield Journal: Lancet Date: 1992-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D H O'Leary; J F Polak; S K Wolfson; M G Bond; W Bommer; S Sheth; B M Psaty; A R Sharrett; T A Manolio Journal: Stroke Date: 1991-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: T Haraki; T Takegoshi; C Kitoh; T Wakasugi; T Saga; J-I Hirai; T Aoyama; A Inazu; H Mabuchi Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: György Kerekes; Pál Soltész; Michael T Nurmohamed; Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Maurizio Turiel; Edit Végh; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Iain McInnes; Zoltán Szekanecz Journal: Nat Rev Rheumatol Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 20.543
Authors: Lisa M Gallo; Janet H Silverstein; Jonathan J Shuster; Michael J Haller Journal: J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 1.634
Authors: Mark J Haykowsky; David M Herrington; Peter H Brubaker; Timothy M Morgan; W Gregory Hundley; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Emily W Harville; Markus Juonala; Jorma S A Viikari; Mika Kähönen; Olli T Raitakari Journal: Pregnancy Hypertens Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.899
Authors: H Kocak; S Gumuslu; E Sahin; K Ceken; C Ermis; A Y Gocmen; G Yakupoglu; F F Ersoy; G Suleymanlar; M Tuncer Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: G P T Areas; A Mazzuco; F R Caruso; R B Jaenisch; R Cabiddu; S A Phillips; R Arena; A Borghi-Silva Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.214