Literature DB >> 21461904

One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP).

R Bittner1, B J Leibl, B Kraft, J Schwarz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A low rate of chronic pain and maximum postoperative comfort are the main goals today in inguinal hernia repair. This four-arm randomised trial compares these parameters after laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) with a standard heavyweight mesh (HW), a pure middleweight polypropylene mesh (MW), a lightweight composite polypropylene mesh (LW), or a titanised lightweight mesh (TLW). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of chronic pain of any severity at the site of hernia repair at 1 year.
METHODS: A total of 600 patients with a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and a defect diameter of 3-5 cm were included in the trial. In all patients, a non-invasive mesh fixation technique was performed using fibrin glue. Patients were assessed for pain, foreign body sensation, and physical activities preoperatively, early postoperatively, at 4 weeks, at 6 months, and at 1 year by questionnaire, and were examined clinically. Postoperatively, seroma formation was measured by ultrasound.
RESULTS: At 1 year after TAPP, frequency of pain did not differ statistically between the four groups (depending on type of activity: between 6-8% with HW mesh, 2-4% with middleweight mesh, and 2-4.7% with both lightweight meshes); average intensity of pain was very low, at between VAS 0.4 ± 3.1 and 1.5 ± 7.8 (MW, LW, TLW) and between 1.9 ± 8.6 and 2.3 ± 9.1 (HW) depending on activity (n.s.). Early postoperatively between 31.3% (LW) and 21.3% (TLW) of the patients needed pain medication (n.s.); at 1 year this percentage had dropped to 0.3% (one HW, one MW). Foreign body sensation did not differ but impairment of physical activities (P = 0.0437) was significantly less in the MW, LW, and TLW group (6-12.7%) compared to HW (15.3%) at 4 weeks; at 1 year this percentage was between 0 and 1.3% (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: Compared to HW mesh, the use of MW, LW, and TLW meshes for laparoscopic hernia repair did not significantly affect rate of chronic pain, but seemed to improve early postoperative convalescence. No difference was found between middleweight pure polypropylene (MW), composite lightweight (LW), or titanised lightweight polypropylene (TLW) meshes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21461904     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0810-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  33 in total

Review 1.  Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  E Aasvang; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias.

Authors:  T Heikkinen; S Wollert; J Osterberg; S Smedberg; S Bringman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Federico Lovisetto; Sandro Zonta; Emanuela Rota; Massimiliano Mazzilli; Marco Bardone; Luca Bottero; Giuseppe Faillace; Mauro Longoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain.

Authors:  Eske K Aasvang; Eliza Gmaehle; Jeanette B Hansen; Bjorn Gmaehle; Julie L Forman; Jochen Schwarz; Reinhard Bittner; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient.

Authors:  J Cunningham; W J Temple; P Mitchell; J A Nixon; R M Preshaw; N A Hagen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Quantification of pain and satisfaction following laparoscopic and open hernia repair.

Authors:  Fumihiko Fujita; Brian Lahmann; Koji Otsuka; Sergey Lyass; Jonathan R Hiatt; Edward H Phillips
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-06

7.  A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anesthesia.

Authors:  H Paajanen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males.

Authors:  M Bay-Nielsen; E Nilsson; P Nordin; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  S Post; B Weiss; M Willer; T Neufang; D Lorenz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Schwarz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic hernia repair comparing titanium-coated lightweight mesh and medium-weight composite mesh.

Authors:  Alfredo Moreno-Egea; Andrés Carrillo-Alcaraz; Víctor Soria-Aledo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Currie; Helen Andrew; Alfredo Tonsi; Paul R Hurley; Sanjay Taribagil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias.

Authors:  M M Poelman; B van den Heuvel; J D Deelder; G S A Abis; N Beudeker; R R Bittner; G Campanelli; D van Dam; B J Dwars; H H Eker; A Fingerhut; I Khatkov; F Koeckerling; J F Kukleta; M Miserez; A Montgomery; R M Munoz Brands; S Morales Conde; F E Muysoms; M Soltes; W Tromp; Y Yavuz; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh for laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Wu; X Zhang; Y Liu; D Cao; Y Yu; Y Ma
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Preventing inguinodynia after hernia surgery: does the type of mesh matter?

Authors:  Nehal Sureshkumar Shah; Aali Sheen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias: some remarks on technical details.

Authors:  F Köckerling; D A Jacob; P Chowbey; D Lomanto
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  [Recurrence after hernia surgery: complication or natural course?].

Authors:  A Kohler; G Beldi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Manjunath Siddaiah-Subramanya; Darius Ashrafi; Breda Memon; Muhammed Ashraf Memon
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  PerFix™ plug versus 4DDOME(®) implants for inguinal hernia repair: prospective multicentric randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Mutter; G Champault; D Binot; M Vix; J Leroy; J Marescaux
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.