Literature DB >> 21461695

TLIF for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective study of 100 patients.

Pier Paolo Mura1, Mauro Costaglioli, Maurizio Piredda, Silvia Caboni, Silvia Casula.   

Abstract

The goal of a fusion of the lumbar spine is to obtain a primary solid arthrodesis thus to alleviate pain. Different circumferential fusion techniques have been described such as combined anterior-posterior fusion (APF), instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The TLIF procedure has rapidly gained popularity; because of its posterolateral extracanalar discectomy and fusion, it has been reported as a safe technique, without the potential complications described when using combined APF and PLIF techniques. A retrospective clinical and radiographic study was performed. The database of our Center was interrogated in a retrospective way to extract data from patients that underwent a one or two level lumbar fusion with TLIF approach. All patients had symptomatic disc degeneration of the lumbar spine. One hundred and fourteen levels fused from 2003 to 2008. All patients were operated in the same center. All the patients were operated by the same surgical team. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 3 months and 1 and 2 years follow-up. The spine was approached through a classic posterior midline incision and subperiosteal muscular detachment. The side of facetectomy was chosen according to the subject's symptoms of leg pain if present. A posterolateral annulotomy was made and subtotal discectomy was performed and the hyaline cartilage of endplates was removed. Once the surgeon was satisfied with endplate preparation, a banana shaped allograft spacer was inserted through the annulotomy and placed anteriorly. Additional autograft locally harvested from decompression was packed behind the allograft spacer in all cases. Laminae and the remaining contralateral facet joint were decorticated, and packed with bone graft (local autologous and allograft chips in some cases). The posterior fusion was instrumented with pedicle screws and titanium rods. The TLIF procedure had led to shortened surgical times, less neurologic injury, and improved overall outcomes. The introduction of the TLIF procedure has allowed surgeons to achieve successful fusion without the risk of nerve root tethering that is seen so frequently with standard PLIF techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21461695      PMCID: PMC3087043          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1761-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  12 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of stand-alone cages and cages in combination with posterior fixation: a literature review.

Authors:  T R Oxland; T Lund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Lumbar Spine Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Conditions: Current Indications and Recommendations.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors.

Authors:  H T Hee; F P Castro; M E Majd; R T Holt; L Myers
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-12

4.  The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care.

Authors:  R B CLOWARD
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1953-03       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  S C Humphreys; S D Hodges; A G Patwardhan; J C Eck; R B Murphy; L A Covington
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with facet-screw fixation.

Authors:  T Stonecipher; S Wright
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Biomechanics of lumbosacral spinal fusion in combined compression-torsion loads.

Authors:  S W Yang; N A Langrana; C K Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; A David Tahernia; Michael F O'Brien; David A B Smith
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-02

9.  Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.

Authors:  T S Whitecloud ; W W Roesch; J E Ricciardi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-04

10.  Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Salvador A Brau; Rick B Delamarter; Michael L Schiffman; Lytton A Williams; Robert G Watkins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  16 in total

1.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for minimally invasive 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: does it improve patient outcome?

Authors:  Juanita Garces; J Franklin Berry; Edison P Valle-Giler; Wale A R Sulaiman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Visceral, vascular, and wound complications following over 13,000 lateral interbody fusions: a survey study and literature review.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Armen R Deukmedjian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Toshitada Miwa; Hironobu Sakaura; Tomoya Yamashita; Shozo Suzuki; Tetsuo Ohwada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Volumetric change in interbody bone graft after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a prospective study.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Shiro Imagama; Tokumi Kanemura; Kotaro Satake; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Ryuichi Shinjo; Hideki Yagi; Tetsuro Hida; Kenyu Ito; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Mikito Tsushima; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Hany El Zahlawy; Hidetoshi Yamaguchi; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Neurologic deficit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Matthias Pumberger; Alexander P Hughes; Russel R Huang; Andrew A Sama; Frank P Cammisa; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Authors:  Antonio Tsahtsarlis; Martin Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Outcomes of posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation of circumferential fusion: a cohort study.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Tague M Thorson; William J Mullin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Boomerang-Shaped Cage with Traditional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yohei Ishihara; Masutaro Morishita; Jiro Miyaki; Koji Kanzaki; Tomoaki Toyone
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-07-25

Review 9.  Set screw fracture with cage dislocation after two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a case report.

Authors:  Philip Johannes Felix Leute; Ahmed Hammad; Isabel Hoffmann; Sebastian Hoppe; Hans-Michael Klinger; Stefan Lakemeier
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-21

10.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Results of 23 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Amit Jhala; Damandeep Singh; Ms Mistry
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.